AIMS: Epidemiological evidence shows that diabetes is associated with a reduced risk of prostate cancer. The objective of this study was to identify genes that may contribute to both type 2 diabetes and prostate cancer outcomes and the biological pathways these diseases may share. METHODS: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study is a population-based prospective cohort study in four U.S. communities that included a baseline examination in 1987-89 and three follow-up exams at three year intervals. Participants were 45-64 years old at baseline. We conducted a genomewide association (GWA) study of incident type 2 diabetes in males, summarized variation across genetic loci into a polygenic risk score, and determined if that diabetes risk score was also associated with incident prostate cancer in the same study population. Secondarily we conducted a separate GWA study of prostate cancer, performed a pathway analysis of both type 2 diabetes and prostate cancer, and qualitatively determined if any of the biochemical pathways identified were shared between the two outcomes. RESULTS: We found that the polygenic risk score for type 2 diabetes was not statistically significantly associated with prostate cancer. The pathway analysis also found no overlap between pathways associated with type 2 diabetes and prostate cancer. However, it did find that the growth hormone signaling pathway was statistically significantly associated with type 2 diabetes (p=0.0001). CONCLUSION: The inability of this study to find an association between type 2 diabetes polygenic risk scores with prostate cancer or biological pathways in common suggests that shared genetic variants may not contribute significantly to explaining shared etiology.
AIMS: Epidemiological evidence shows that diabetes is associated with a reduced risk of prostate cancer. The objective of this study was to identify genes that may contribute to both type 2 diabetes and prostate cancer outcomes and the biological pathways these diseases may share. METHODS: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study is a population-based prospective cohort study in four U.S. communities that included a baseline examination in 1987-89 and three follow-up exams at three year intervals. Participants were 45-64 years old at baseline. We conducted a genomewide association (GWA) study of incident type 2 diabetes in males, summarized variation across genetic loci into a polygenic risk score, and determined if that diabetes risk score was also associated with incident prostate cancer in the same study population. Secondarily we conducted a separate GWA study of prostate cancer, performed a pathway analysis of both type 2 diabetes and prostate cancer, and qualitatively determined if any of the biochemical pathways identified were shared between the two outcomes. RESULTS: We found that the polygenic risk score for type 2 diabetes was not statistically significantly associated with prostate cancer. The pathway analysis also found no overlap between pathways associated with type 2 diabetes and prostate cancer. However, it did find that the growth hormone signaling pathway was statistically significantly associated with type 2 diabetes (p=0.0001). CONCLUSION: The inability of this study to find an association between type 2 diabetes polygenic risk scores with prostate cancer or biological pathways in common suggests that shared genetic variants may not contribute significantly to explaining shared etiology.
Entities:
Keywords:
Type 2 diabetes; pathway analysis; polygenic risk score; prostate cancer
Authors: C Wu; D M Moreira; L Gerber; R S Rittmaster; G L Andriole; S J Freedland Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2011-06-28 Impact factor: 5.554
Authors: Victoria L Stevens; Jiyoung Ahn; Juzhong Sun; Eric J Jacobs; Steven C Moore; Alpa V Patel; Sonja I Berndt; Demetrius Albanes; Richard B Hayes Journal: Prostate Date: 2010-05-01 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Tamra E Meyer; Eric Boerwinkle; Alanna C Morrison; Kelly A Volcik; Maureen Sanderson; Ann L Coker; James S Pankow; Aaron R Folsom Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Laura J Rasmussen-Torvik; Alvaro Alonso; Man Li; Wen Kao; Anna Köttgen; Yu Yan; David Couper; Eric Boerwinkle; Suzette J Bielinski; James S Pankow Journal: Genet Epidemiol Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 2.135
Authors: B Fontaine-Bisson; F Renström; O Rolandsson; F Payne; G Hallmans; I Barroso; P W Franks Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2010-06-23 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: N Yiannakouris; J A Cooper; S Shah; F Drenos; H A Ireland; J W Stephens; K-W Li; R Elkeles; I F Godsland; M Kivimaki; A D Hingorani; M Kumari; P J Talmud; S E Humphries Journal: Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis Date: 2011-09-14 Impact factor: 4.222
Authors: Sergio E Baranzini; Nicholas W Galwey; Joanne Wang; Pouya Khankhanian; Raija Lindberg; Daniel Pelletier; Wen Wu; Bernard M J Uitdehaag; Ludwig Kappos; Chris H Polman; Paul M Matthews; Stephen L Hauser; Rachel A Gibson; Jorge R Oksenberg; Michael R Barnes Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2009-03-13 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Inês Barroso; Jian'an Luan; Rita P S Middelberg; Anne-Helen Harding; Paul W Franks; Rupert W Jakes; D Clayton; Alan J Schafer; Stephen O'Rahilly; Nicholas J Wareham Journal: PLoS Biol Date: 2003-10-13 Impact factor: 8.029