| Literature DB >> 23565150 |
Xiaoyang Zhao1, Yuguan Ze, Guodong Gao, Xuezi Sang, Bing Li, Suxin Gui, Lei Sheng, Qingqing Sun, Jie Cheng, Zhe Cheng, Renping Hu, Ling Wang, Fashui Hong.
Abstract
Recent studies have demonstrated nanosized titanium dioxide (nano-TiO2)-induced fertility reduction and ovary injury in animals. To better understand how nano-TiO2 act in mice, female mice were exposed to 2.5, 5, and 10 mg/kg nano-TiO2 by intragastric administration for 90 consecutive days; the ovary injuries, fertility, hormone levels, and inflammation-related or follicular atresia-related cytokine expression were investigated. The results showed that nano-TiO2 was deposited in the ovary, resulting in significant reduction of body weight, relative weight of ovary and fertility, alterations of hematological and serum parameters and sex hormone levels, atretic follicle increases, inflammation, and necrosis. Furthermore, nano-TiO2 exposure resulted in marked increases of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 2, epidermal growth factor, tumor necrosis factor-α, tissue plasminogen activator, interleukin-1β, interleukin -6, Fas, and FasL expression, and significant decreases of insulin-like growth factor-1, luteinizing hormone receptor, inhibin α, and growth differentiation factor 9 expression in mouse ovary. These findings implied that fertility reduction and ovary injury of mice following exposure to nano-TiO2 may be associated with alteration of inflammation-related or follicular atresia-related cytokine expressions, and humans should take great caution when handling nano-TiO2.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23565150 PMCID: PMC3615008 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059378
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Changes of body weight and relative weight of ovary of mice caused by intragastric administration of nano-TiO2 for 90 consecutive days.
Different letters indicate significant differences between groups (p<0.05). Values represent means ± SE (N = 10).
Figure 2Titanium accumulation in mouse ovary caused by intragastric administration of nano-TiO2 for 90 consecutive days.
Different letters indicate significant differences between groups (p<0.05). Values represent means ± SE (N = 5).
Hematological and biochemical parameters in female mice by intragastric administration of nano-TiO2 for 90 consecutive days.
| Index | Nano-TiO2 (mg/kg BW) | |||
| 0 | 2.5 | 5 | 10 | |
|
| 7.88±0.39a | 5.78±0.29b | 4.08±0.20c | 2.76±0.14d |
|
| 6.05±0.30a | 3.79±0.19b | 2.29±0.11c | 1.68±0.08d |
|
| 1.62±0.08a | 1.18±0.06b | 0.81±0.04c | 0.52±0.03d |
|
| 9.45±0.47a | 8.57±0.43b | 7.59±0.38c | 6.89±0.34d |
|
| 146.12±7.30a | 131.55±6.60b | 127.11±6.40b | 116.55±5.9c |
|
| 19.29±0.96a | 22.53±1.13b | 26.38±1.32c | 35.82±1.79d |
|
| 77.27±3.86a | 86.25±4.31b | 97.56±4.88c | 115.39±5.77d |
|
| 92.81±4.64a | 108.66±5.43b | 118.61±5.93c | 136.86±6.84d |
|
| 659.66±32.98a | 715.38±35.77b | 796.71±39.84c | 896.79±44.84d |
|
| 228.76±11.44a | 157.39±7.87b | 105.26±5.26c | 89.87±0.49d |
|
| 8.45±0.422a | 9.89±0.49b | 12.23±0.61c | 14.68±0.73d |
|
| 9.56±0.48a | 8.02±0.40b | 6.88±0.34c | 6.05±0.30d |
Different letters indicate significant differences between groups (p<0.05). Values represent means ± SE (N = 5).
Effects of nano-TiO2 on conception of female mice, number of newborns, and weight of neonates after intragastric administration of nano-TiO2 for 90 consecutive days.
| Index | Nano-TiO2 (mg/kg BW) | |||
| 0 | 2.5 | 5 | 10 | |
|
| 100±5a | 85±4.25b | 75±3.75c | 65±3.25d |
|
| 100±5a | 81±4.05b | 72±3.6c | 58±2.90d |
|
| 14±0.7a | 10±0.5b | 8±0.4c | 6±0.3d |
|
| 1.54±0.077a | 1.52±0.076a | 1.45±0.073b | 1.40±0.07b |
|
| 1.57±0.079a | 1.54±0.077a | 1.47±0.074b | 1.41±0.07b |
|
| 98±4.90a | 89±4.45b | 81±4.05c | 72±3.60d |
Different letters indicate significant differences between groups (p<0.05). Values represent means ± SE (N = 5).
Effects of nano-TiO2 on sex hormone levels in sera of female mice.
| Hormone level | Nano-TiO2 NPs (mg/kg BW) | |||
| 0 | 2.5 | 5 | 10 | |
|
| 83.66±4.18a | 91.09±4.554b | 101.98±5.10c | 111.88±5.59d |
|
| 34.99±1.75a | 30.11±1.506b | 26.49±1.32c | 23.42±1.17d |
|
| 0.12±0.006a | 0.061±0.003b | 0.038±0.002c | 0.021±0.001d |
|
| 0.48±0.024a | 0.42±0.021b | 0.37±0.018c | 0.28±0.014d |
|
| 0.60±0.030a | 0.64±0.032a | 0.67±0.033a | 0.73±0.036a |
|
| 71.13±3.56a | 61.55±3.08b | 55.01±2.75c | 49.02±2.45d |
|
| 0.43±0.021a | 0.42±0.021a | 0.42±0.021a | 0.42±0.021a |
Different letters indicate significant differences between groups (p<0.05). Values represent means ± SE (N = 5).
Figure 3Histopathological observation of ovary of mice caused by intragastric administration of nano-TiO2 for 90 consecutive days.
(a) control groups (unexposed mice) present normal development of primary follicle and secondary follicle; (b) 2.5 mg/kg nano-TiO2-exposed group: green cycle suggest inflammatory cell infiltration, yellow arrows indicate atretic follicle, red arrows present apoptosis or tissue necrosis; (c) 5 mg/kg nano-TiO2-exposed group: green cycle suggest severe inflammatory cell infiltration, yellow cycles present nano-TiO2 deposition, yellow arrows indicate atretic follicle, red arrows present apoptosis or tissue necrosis in ovary; (d) 10 mg/kg nano-TiO2 -exposed group: green cycle suggest severe inflammatory cell infiltration, yellow arrows indicate atretic follicle, red arrows present tissue necrosis, yellow cycle may show aggregation of nano-TiO2 in ovary. Arrow A spot is a representative cell that not engulfed the nano-TiO2, while arrow B spot denotes a representative cell that loaded with nano-TiO2. The right panels show the corresponding Raman spectra identifying the specific peaks at about 148 cm−1.
Effect of nano-TiO2 on the levels of cytokine gene mRNA expression in mouse ovary.
| Ratio ofgene/actin | Nano-TiO2 (mg/kg BW) | |||
| 0 | 2.5 | 5 | 10 | |
|
| 1.35±0.068a | 0.92±0.046b | 0.58±0.029c | 0.32±0.016d |
|
| 0.41±0.021a | 0.69±0.035b | 0.99±0.050c | 1.37±0.069d |
|
| 0.71±0.036a | 1.03±0.052b | 1.38±0.069c | 1.75±0.088d |
|
| 0.27±0.014a | 0.43±0.022b | 0.69±0.035c | 0.97±0.049d |
|
| 0.07±0.004a | 0.28±0.014b | 0.42±0.021c | 0.56±0.028d |
|
| 0.46±0.023a | 0.25±0.013b | 0.12±0.006c | 0.05±0.003d |
|
| 0.95±0.048a | 0.61±0.031b | 0.38±0.019c | 0.12±0.006d |
|
| 0.22±0.011a | 0.39±0.020b | 0.68±0.034c | 1.05±0.053d |
|
| 0.09±0.005a | 0.25±0.013b | 0.48±0.024c | 0.76±0.038d |
|
| 0.55±0.028a | 0.78±0.039b | 1.06±0.053c | 1.67±0.084d |
|
| 0.33±0.017a | 0.54±0.027b | 0.86±0.043c | 1.13±0.057d |
|
| 1.07±0.054a | 0.72±0.036b | 0.46±0.023c | 0.29±0.015d |
Different letters indicate significant differences between groups (p<0.05). Values represent means ± SE (N = 5).
Effects of nano-TiO2 on the levels of cytokine protein expression in mouse ovary.
| Protein expression (ng/g tissue) | Nano-TiO2 (mg/kg BW) | |||
| 0 | 2.5 | 5 | 10 | |
|
| 117.62±5.88a | 92.29±4.61b | 74.19±3.71c | 61.24±3.06d |
|
| 34.38±1.72a | 40.41±2.02b | 47.30±2.36c | 61.61±3.08d |
|
| 41.22±2.06a | 65.38±3.27b | 82.85±4.14c | 102.42±5.12d |
|
| 20.00±1.00a | 31.03±1.75b | 50.14±2.51c | 71.49±3.57d |
|
| 11.32±0.56a | 18.50±0.93b | 26.44±1.32c | 34.22±1.71d |
|
| 39.53±1.98a | 29.73±1.49b | 21.76±1.09c | 15.21±0.76d |
|
| 82.90±4.14a | 66.77±3.34b | 52.18±2.61c | 38.85±1.94d |
|
| 22.98±1.15a | 30.52±1.53b | 38.20±1.91c | 47.38±2.37d |
|
| 10.99±0.55a | 19.19±0.96b | 31.59±1.58c | 42.04±2.10d |
|
| 43.37±2.17a | 64.47±3.22b | 89.99±4.50c | 125.98±6.30d |
|
| 31.45±1.57a | 42.24±2.11b | 54.05±2.70c | 67.11±3.35d |
|
| 85.37±4.27a | 66.70±3.33b | 47.85±2.39c | 31.19±1.56d |
Different letters indicate significant differences between groups (p<0.05). Values represent means ± SE (N = 5).
Figure 4A schematic showing possible mechanisms of nano-TiO2 induced follicular atresia in mouse ovary.