Alkystis Phinikaridou1, Marcelo E Andia1, Prakash Saha1, Bijan Modarai1, Alberto Smith1, René M Botnar1. 1. Division of Imaging Science and Biomedical Engineering (A.P., M.E.A., R.M.B.), Cardiovascular Division, Academic Department of Surgery (P.S., B.M., A.S.), Cardiovascular Division, BHF Centre of Excellence (A.P., P.S., A.S., R.M.B.), Wellcome Trust and EPSRC Medical Engineering Center (R.M.B.), King's College London, London, UK; and Radiology Department, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile (M.E.A.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Deep vein thrombosis remains a major health problem necessitating accurate diagnosis. Thrombolysis is associated with significant morbidity and is effective only for the treatment of unorganized thrombus. We tested the feasibility of in vivo magnetization transfer (MT) and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging to detect thrombus organization in a murine model of deep vein thrombosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Deep vein thrombosis was induced in the inferior vena cava of male BALB/C mice. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed at days 1, 7, 14, 21, and 28 after thrombus induction using MT, diffusion-weighted, inversion-recovery, and T1-mapping protocols. Delayed enhancement and T1 mapping were repeated 2 hours after injection of a fibrin contrast agent. Finally, excised thrombi were used for histology. We found that MT and diffusion-weighted imaging can detect histological changes associated with thrombus aging. MT rate (MTR) maps and percentage of MT rate (%MTR) allowed visualization and quantification of the thrombus protein content, respectively. The %MTR increased with thrombus organization and was significantly higher at days 14, 21, and 28 after thrombus induction (days 1, 7, 14, 21, 28: %MTR=2483±451, 2079±1210, 7029±2490, 10 295±4356, 32 994±25 449; PANOVA<0.05). There was a significant positive correlation between the %MTR and the histological protein content of the thrombus (r=0.70; P<0.05). The apparent diffusion coefficient was lower in erythrocyte-rich and collagen-rich thrombus (0.72±0.10 and 0.69±0.05 [×10(-3) mm(2)/s]). Thrombus at days 7 and 14 had the highest apparent diffusion coefficient values (0.95±0.09 and 1.10±0.18 [×10(-3) mm(2)/s]). CONCLUSIONS: MT and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging sequences are promising for the staging of thrombus composition and could be useful in guiding medical intervention.
BACKGROUND: Deep vein thrombosis remains a major health problem necessitating accurate diagnosis. Thrombolysis is associated with significant morbidity and is effective only for the treatment of unorganized thrombus. We tested the feasibility of in vivo magnetization transfer (MT) and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging to detect thrombus organization in a murine model of deep vein thrombosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Deep vein thrombosis was induced in the inferior vena cava of male BALB/C mice. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed at days 1, 7, 14, 21, and 28 after thrombus induction using MT, diffusion-weighted, inversion-recovery, and T1-mapping protocols. Delayed enhancement and T1 mapping were repeated 2 hours after injection of a fibrin contrast agent. Finally, excised thrombi were used for histology. We found that MT and diffusion-weighted imaging can detect histological changes associated with thrombus aging. MT rate (MTR) maps and percentage of MT rate (%MTR) allowed visualization and quantification of the thrombus protein content, respectively. The %MTR increased with thrombus organization and was significantly higher at days 14, 21, and 28 after thrombus induction (days 1, 7, 14, 21, 28: %MTR=2483±451, 2079±1210, 7029±2490, 10 295±4356, 32 994±25 449; PANOVA<0.05). There was a significant positive correlation between the %MTR and the histological protein content of the thrombus (r=0.70; P<0.05). The apparent diffusion coefficient was lower in erythrocyte-rich and collagen-rich thrombus (0.72±0.10 and 0.69±0.05 [×10(-3) mm(2)/s]). Thrombus at days 7 and 14 had the highest apparent diffusion coefficient values (0.95±0.09 and 1.10±0.18 [×10(-3) mm(2)/s]). CONCLUSIONS: MT and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging sequences are promising for the staging of thrombus composition and could be useful in guiding medical intervention.
Authors: Seong-Eun Kim; Gerald S Treiman; John A Roberts; Eun-Kee Jeong; Xianfeng Shi; J Rock Hadley; Dennis L Parker Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2011-09-16 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: C H P Jansen; D Perera; M R Makowski; A J Wiethoff; A Phinikaridou; R M Razavi; M S Marber; G F Greil; E Nagel; D Maintz; S Redwood; R M Botnar Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-07-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: J M Gomori; R I Grossman; T Asakura; M D Schnall; S Atlas; G Holland; R L Mittl Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 1993 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: W J Rogers; J W Prichard; Y L Hu; P R Olson; D H Benckart; C M Kramer; D A Vido; N Reichek Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Tone Enden; Leiv Sandvik; Nils-Einar Kløw; Geir Hafsahl; Pål Andre Holme; Lars Olaf Holmen; Waleed Ghanima; Anne Mette Njaastad; Gunnar Sandbaek; Carl-Erik Slagsvold; Per Morten Sandset Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2007-09-06 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Prakash Saha; Julia Humphries; Bijan Modarai; Katherine Mattock; Matthew Waltham; Colin E Evans; Anwar Ahmad; Ashish S Patel; Sobath Premaratne; Oliver T A Lyons; Alberto Smith Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Francesco Blasi; Bruno L Oliveira; Tyson A Rietz; Nicholas J Rotile; Pratap C Naha; David P Cormode; David Izquierdo-Garcia; Ciprian Catana; Peter Caravan Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2015-08-13 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Justinas Silickas; Stephen A Black; Alkystis Phinikaridou; Adam M Gwozdz; Alberto Smith; Prakash Saha Journal: Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J Date: 2018 Jul-Sep
Authors: Venkatesh Mani; Nadia Alie; Sarayu Ramachandran; Philip M Robson; Cecilia Besa; Gregory Piazza; Michele Mercuri; Michael Grosso; Bachir Taouli; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Zahi A Fayad Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2015-06-02 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: Francesco Blasi; Bruno L Oliveira; Tyson A Rietz; Nicholas J Rotile; Helen Day; Pratap C Naha; David P Cormode; David Izquierdo-Garcia; Ciprian Catana; Peter Caravan Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2015-05-14 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Gregory M Lanza; Grace Cui; Anne H Schmieder; Huiying Zhang; John S Allen; Michael J Scott; Todd Williams; Xiaoxia Yang Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2017-06-12 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Yu Shrike Zhang; Farideh Davoudi; Philipp Walch; Amir Manbachi; Xuan Luo; Valeria Dell'Erba; Amir K Miri; Hassan Albadawi; Andrea Arneri; Xiaoyun Li; Xiaoying Wang; Mehmet Remzi Dokmeci; Ali Khademhosseini; Rahmi Oklu Journal: Lab Chip Date: 2016-10-18 Impact factor: 6.799
Authors: Steven P Grover; Colin E Evans; Ashish S Patel; Bijan Modarai; Prakash Saha; Alberto Smith Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2015-12-17 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Prakash Saha; Marcelo E Andia; Bijan Modarai; Ulrike Blume; Julia Humphries; Ashish S Patel; Alkystis Phinikaridou; Colin E Evans; Katherine Mattock; Steven P Grover; Anwar Ahmad; Oliver T Lyons; Rizwan Q Attia; Thomas Renné; Sobath Premaratne; Andrea J Wiethoff; René M Botnar; Tobias Schaeffter; Matthew Waltham; Alberto Smith Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-07-02 Impact factor: 29.690