BACKGROUND: Resection has been the standard of care for patients with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Transarterial embolization and percutaneous ablation are alternative therapies often reserved for suboptimal surgical candidates. Here we compare long-term outcomes of patients with solitary HCC treated with resection versus combined embo-ablation. METHODS: We previously reported a retrospective comparison of resection and embo-ablation in 73 patients with solitary HCC<7 cm after a median follow-up of 23 months. This study represents long-term updated follow-up over a median of 134 months. RESULTS: There was no difference in survival among Okuda I patients who underwent resection versus embo-ablation (66 vs 58 months, p=.39). There was no difference between the groups in the rate of distant intrahepatic (p=.35) or metastatic progression (p=.48). Surgical patients experienced more complications (p=.004), longer hospitalizations (p<.001), and were more likely to require hospital readmission within 30 days of discharge (p=.03). CONCLUSION: Over a median follow up of more than 10 years, we found no significant difference in overall survival of Okuda 1 patients with solitary HCC<7 cm who underwent surgical resection versus embo-ablation. Our data suggest that there may be a greater role for primary embo-ablation in the treatment of potentially resectable solitary HCC.
BACKGROUND: Resection has been the standard of care for patients with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Transarterial embolization and percutaneous ablation are alternative therapies often reserved for suboptimal surgical candidates. Here we compare long-term outcomes of patients with solitary HCC treated with resection versus combined embo-ablation. METHODS: We previously reported a retrospective comparison of resection and embo-ablation in 73 patients with solitary HCC<7 cm after a median follow-up of 23 months. This study represents long-term updated follow-up over a median of 134 months. RESULTS: There was no difference in survival among Okuda I patients who underwent resection versus embo-ablation (66 vs 58 months, p=.39). There was no difference between the groups in the rate of distant intrahepatic (p=.35) or metastatic progression (p=.48). Surgical patients experienced more complications (p=.004), longer hospitalizations (p<.001), and were more likely to require hospital readmission within 30 days of discharge (p=.03). CONCLUSION: Over a median follow up of more than 10 years, we found no significant difference in overall survival of Okuda 1 patients with solitary HCC<7 cm who underwent surgical resection versus embo-ablation. Our data suggest that there may be a greater role for primary embo-ablation in the treatment of potentially resectable solitary HCC.
Authors: Mary Maluccio; Anne M Covey; Ripal Gandhi; Mithat Gonen; George I Getrajdman; Lynn A Brody; Yuman Fong; William Jarnagin; Michael D'Angelica; Leslie Blumgart; Ronald DeMatteo; Karen T Brown Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Jessica A Davila; Robert O Morgan; Yasser Shaib; Katherine A McGlynn; Hashem B El-Serag Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Andrea Veltri; Paolo Moretto; Andrea Doriguzzi; Eva Pagano; Giovanna Carrara; Giovanni Gandini Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2005-10-14 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: David A Kooby; Jennifer Stockman; Leah Ben-Porat; Mithat Gonen; William R Jarnagin; Ronald P Dematteo; Scott Tuorto; David Wuest; Leslie H Blumgart; Yuman Fong Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Carsten Meyer; Claus Christian Pieper; Hojjat Ahmadzadehfar; Nina Alexandra Lampe; Eva Maria E Matuschek; Thomas Adrian Maschke; Simon Jonas Enkirch; Markus Essler; Ulrich Spengler; Hans Heinz Schild Journal: Onco Targets Ther Date: 2017-09-26 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Emmanuel Gabriel; Jin Kim; Katherine T Ostapoff; Kristopher Attwood; Sergei Kurenov; Boris Kuvshinoff; Steven N Hochwald; Steven J Nurkin Journal: J Gastrointest Oncol Date: 2018-04