Literature DB >> 23563709

Kinetics of olfactory responses might largely depend on the odorant-receptor interaction and the odorant deactivation postulated for flux detectors.

Karl-Ernst Kaissling1.   

Abstract

Experimental data together with modeling of pheromone perireceptor and receptor events in moths (Bombyx mori, Antheraea polyphemus) suggest that the kinetics of olfactory receptor potentials largely depend on the association of the odorant with the neuronal receptor molecules and the deactivation of the odorant accumulated around the receptor neuron. The first process could be responsible for the reaction times (mean about 400 ms) of the nerve impulses at threshold. The second process has been postulated for flux detectors such as olfactory sensilla of moths. The odorant deactivation could involve a modification of the pheromone-binding protein (PBP) that "locks" the pheromone inside the inner binding cavity of the protein. The model combines seemingly contradictory functions of the PBP such as pheromone transport, protection of the pheromone from enzymatic degradation, pheromone deactivation, and pheromone-receptor interaction. Model calculations reveal a density of at least 6,000 receptor molecules per µm(2) of neuronal membrane. The volatile decanoyl-thio-1,1,1-trifluoropropanone specifically blocks pheromone receptor neurons, probably when bound to the PBP and by competitive binding to the receptor molecules. The shallow dose-response curve of the receptor potential and altered response properties observed with pheromone derivatives or after adaptation may indicate shortened opening of ion channels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23563709     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-013-0812-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  80 in total

1.  Chemicals in laboratory room air stimulate olfactory neurons of female Bombyx mori.

Authors:  J Ziesmann; I Valterova; K Haberkorn; M G de Brito Sanchez; K Kaissling
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Discontinuity of the excitation process in locust visual cells.

Authors:  J Scholes
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1965

3.  Drosophila OBP LUSH is required for activity of pheromone-sensitive neurons.

Authors:  Pingxi Xu; Rachel Atkinson; David N M Jones; Dean P Smith
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-01-20       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Binding of the general odorant binding protein of Bombyx mori BmorGOBP2 to the moth sex pheromone components.

Authors:  Xiaoli He; George Tzotzos; Christine Woodcock; John A Pickett; Tony Hooper; Linda M Field; Jing-Jiang Zhou
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Kinetics and molecular properties of pheromone binding and release.

Authors:  Walter S Leal; Angela M Chen; Yuko Ishida; Vicky P Chiang; Melissa L Erickson; Tania I Morgan; Jennifer M Tsuruda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Odorant binding by a pheromone binding protein: active site mapping by photoaffinity labeling.

Authors:  G Du; C S Ng; G D Prestwich
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1994-04-26       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Pheromone binding and inactivation by moth antennae.

Authors:  R G Vogt; L M Riddiford
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1981 Sep 10-16       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Ligand binding to six recombinant pheromone-binding proteins of Antheraea polyphemus and Antheraea pernyi.

Authors:  R Maida; G Ziegelberger; K-E Kaissling
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2003-07-23       Impact factor: 2.200

9.  Dynamical modeling of the moth pheromone-sensitive olfactory receptor neuron within its sensillar environment.

Authors:  Yuqiao Gu; Jean-Pierre Rospars
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Odorant and pheromone receptors in insects.

Authors:  Tal Soo Ha; Dean P Smith
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 5.505

View more
  14 in total

1.  Insect chemoreception: a tribute to John G. Hildebrand.

Authors:  Wolfgang Rössler; Monika Stengl
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Pheromone discrimination by a pH-tuned polymorphism of the Bombyx mori pheromone-binding protein.

Authors:  Fred F Damberger; Erich Michel; Yuko Ishida; Walter S Leal; Kurt Wüthrich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  High-speed odor transduction and pulse tracking by insect olfactory receptor neurons.

Authors:  Paul Szyszka; Richard C Gerkin; C Giovanni Galizia; Brian H Smith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Strength in diversity: functional diversity among olfactory neurons of the same type.

Authors:  Eryn Slankster; Seth R Odell; Dennis Mathew
Journal:  J Bioenerg Biomembr       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.945

Review 5.  Odorant Receptors and Odorant-Binding Proteins as Insect Pest Control Targets: A Comparative Analysis.

Authors:  Herbert Venthur; Jing-Jiang Zhou
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  Identification and Characterization of Candidate Chemosensory Gene Families from Spodoptera exigua Developmental Transcriptomes.

Authors:  Nai-Yong Liu; Ting Zhang; Zhan-Feng Ye; Fei Li; Shuang-Lin Dong
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 6.580

7.  Odor detection in Manduca sexta is optimized when odor stimuli are pulsed at a frequency matching the wing beat during flight.

Authors:  Kevin C Daly; Faizan Kalwar; Mandy Hatfield; Erich Staudacher; Samual P Bradley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Olfactory coding in the insect brain: data and conjectures.

Authors:  C Giovanni Galizia
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Take time: odor coding capacity across sensory neurons increases over time in Drosophila.

Authors:  Daniel Münch; C Giovanni Galizia
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  A molecular odorant transduction model and the complexity of spatio-temporal encoding in the Drosophila antenna.

Authors:  Aurel A Lazar; Chung-Heng Yeh
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.