Literature DB >> 23562894

Surgically proved visually isoattenuating pancreatic adenocarcinoma undetected in both dynamic CT and MRI. Was blind pancreaticoduodenectomy justified?

Konstantinos Blouhos1, Konstantinos A Boulas, Dimitrios G Tselios, Stavroula P Katsaouni, Basiliki Mauroeidi, Anestis Hatzigeorgiadis.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Visually isoattenuating pancreatic adenocarcinoma is defined as a mass not directly visible on CT and recognizable only by secondary imaging signs. The frequency of isoattenuating pancreatic adenocarcinomas at dynamic-enhanced CT has been reported to range from 5.4% to 14%. Furthermore, 80% of the visually isoattenuating pancreatic adenocarcinomas are detectable in dynamic-enhanced MRI. Consequently, a pancreatic adenocarcinoma undetected in both the above imaging studies is an exceptionally rare event. PRESENTATION OF CASE: The present report describes a case of a histologically proved 3.5cm pancreatic adenocarcinoma undetected in both dynamic-enhanced CT and MRI. The patient presented with progressive jaundice over the preceding 20 days. Initial abdominal CT showed a dilated pancreatic and common bile duct without demonstration of a lesion responsible for the clinical and imaging findings. Additional diagnostic work-up with dynamic CT and dynamic MRI failed to reveal a definitive mass. ERCP revealed an irregular interruption of the pancreatic and distal common bile duct with upstream dilation. Blind radical pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed. Histologic examination showed a pT3pN1MO pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the head/neck. DISCUSSION: Isoattenuating pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients represent a small but meaningful subset of patients with pancreatic cancer, as they have better survival. The more favorable postsurgical survival makes it even more imperative to correctly diagnose their cases at early stages by obtaining further diagnostic work-up with dynamic pancreatic CT, dynamic MRI and endoscopic ultrasound.
CONCLUSION: When the above studies fail to unmask the lesion, blind pancreaticoduodenectomy should be based on strong clinical suspicion and secondary imaging findings.
Copyright © 2013 Surgical Associates Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23562894      PMCID: PMC3731732          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2013.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep        ISSN: 2210-2612


  13 in total

1.  Imaging of early pancreatic cancer on multidetector row helical computed tomography.

Authors:  K Takeshita; K Kutomi; T Haruyama; A Watanabe; S Furui; J Fukushima; T Asano
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Is intraoperative confirmation of malignancy during pancreaticoduodenectomy mandatory?

Authors:  Giuseppe Garcea; Matthew S Metcalfe; David P Berry; Gavin S Robertson; David M Lloyd; Ashley R Dennison
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Using multidetector row computed tomography to diagnose and stage pancreatic carcinoma: the problems and the possibilities.

Authors:  Mariano Scaglione; Antonio Pinto; Stefania Romano; Michele Scialpi; Luca Volterrani; Antonio Rotondo; Luigia Romano
Journal:  JOP       Date:  2005-01-13

4.  Diagnostic yield of malignancy during EUS-guided FNA of solid lesions with and without a stylet: a prospective, single blind, randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Sachin Wani; Dayna Early; Julie Kunkel; Ann Leathersich; Christine E Hovis; Thomas G Hollander; Cara Kohlmeier; Cynthia Zelenka; Riad Azar; Steven Edmundowicz; Brian Collins; Jingxia Liu; Matthew Hall; Daniel Mullady
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Incidentally discovered solid pancreatic masses: imaging and clinical observations.

Authors:  Margaret Goodman; Jürgen K Willmann; R Brooke Jeffrey
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2012-02

6.  Patients with obstructive jaundice and biliary stricture ± mass lesion on imaging: prevalence of malignancy and potential role of EUS-FNA.

Authors:  Pavan Tummala; Satish Munigala; Mohamad A Eloubeidi; Banke Agarwal
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.062

7.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy for suspected but unproven malignancy.

Authors:  J S Thompson; K M Murayama; J A Edney; L F Rikkers
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Diagnostic value of the delayed phase image for iso-attenuating pancreatic carcinomas in the pancreatic parenchymal phase on multidetector computed tomography.

Authors:  Kousei Ishigami; Kengo Yoshimitsu; Hiroyuki Irie; Tsuyoshi Tajima; Yoshiki Asayama; Akihiro Nishie; Masakazu Hirakawa; Yasuhiro Ushijima; Daisuke Okamoto; Shigenori Nagata; Yunosuke Nishihara; Koji Yamaguchi; Akinobu Taketomi; Hiroshi Honda
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 3.528

9.  Blind Whipple resections for periampullary and pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  E Ramsey Camp; Stephen B Vogel
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 0.688

Review 10.  Imaging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: update on staging/resectability.

Authors:  Eric P Tamm; Aparna Balachandran; Priya R Bhosale; Matthew H Katz; Jason B Fleming; Jeffrey H Lee; Gauri R Varadhachary
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 2.303

View more
  3 in total

1.  Quantitative and Qualitative Comparison of Single-Source Dual-Energy Computed Tomography and 120-kVp Computed Tomography for the Assessment of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Priya Bhosale; Ott Le; Aprana Balachandran; Patricia Fox; Eric Paulson; Eric Tamm
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Comparison of Multidetector CT and Gadobutrol-Enhanced MR Imaging for Evaluation of Small, Solid Pancreatic Lesions.

Authors:  Tae Won Choi; Jeong Min Lee; Jung Hoon Kim; Mi Hye Yu; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 3.500

3.  Tumor heterogeneity of pancreas head cancer assessed by CT texture analysis: association with survival outcomes after curative resection.

Authors:  Gabin Yun; Young Hoon Kim; Yoon Jin Lee; Bohyoung Kim; Jin-Hyeok Hwang; Dong Joon Choi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.