OBJECTIVES:Heart rate kinetics are faster in well-trained athletes at exercise onset, indicating sensitivity to training status, but whether they track performance changes due to changes in training load is unknown. DESIGN: Randomised, counterbalanced, cross-over. METHODS:17 cyclists completed two weeks of light and two weeks of heavy training. The day after each training period heart rate was recorded during 5 min cycling at 100 W to determine the maximal rate of heart rate increase. Participants then performed a 5 min cycle time-trial after which heart rate recovery was determined. RESULTS: Work during 5 min cycle time-trial decreased 3.5% (P<0.04) in participants (n=8) who increased training load (completed light training then heavy training) and, although maximal rate of heart rate increase did not change (P=0.27), within-individual changes in work were correlated with changes in maximal rate of heart rate increase (r=0.87, P=0.005). Work during 5 min cycle time-trial increased 6.5% (P<0.001) in 9 participants who decreased training load (completed heavy training then light training) and maximal rate of heart rate increase increased 28% (P=0.002) but the changes in maximal work were not related to changes in rate of heart rate increase (r=0.32, P=0.40). Heart rate recovery tended to track changes in 5 min cycle time-trial work following increases and decreases in training load (r=0.65-0.75, P=0.03-0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Maximal rate of heart rate increases during cycling at 100 W tracks reductions in exercise performance when training load is increased, but not performance improvements when training loads are reduced. Maximal rate of heart rate increase may be a useful adjunct to heart rate recovery for tracking changes in exercise performance.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: Heart rate kinetics are faster in well-trained athletes at exercise onset, indicating sensitivity to training status, but whether they track performance changes due to changes in training load is unknown. DESIGN: Randomised, counterbalanced, cross-over. METHODS: 17 cyclists completed two weeks of light and two weeks of heavy training. The day after each training period heart rate was recorded during 5 min cycling at 100 W to determine the maximal rate of heart rate increase. Participants then performed a 5 min cycle time-trial after which heart rate recovery was determined. RESULTS: Work during 5 min cycle time-trial decreased 3.5% (P<0.04) in participants (n=8) who increased training load (completed light training then heavy training) and, although maximal rate of heart rate increase did not change (P=0.27), within-individual changes in work were correlated with changes in maximal rate of heart rate increase (r=0.87, P=0.005). Work during 5 min cycle time-trial increased 6.5% (P<0.001) in 9 participants who decreased training load (completed heavy training then light training) and maximal rate of heart rate increase increased 28% (P=0.002) but the changes in maximal work were not related to changes in rate of heart rate increase (r=0.32, P=0.40). Heart rate recovery tended to track changes in 5 min cycle time-trial work following increases and decreases in training load (r=0.65-0.75, P=0.03-0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Maximal rate of heart rate increases during cycling at 100 W tracks reductions in exercise performance when training load is increased, but not performance improvements when training loads are reduced. Maximal rate of heart rate increase may be a useful adjunct to heart rate recovery for tracking changes in exercise performance.
Authors: Clint R Bellenger; Joel T Fuller; Rebecca L Thomson; Kade Davison; Eileen Y Robertson; Jonathan D Buckley Journal: Sports Med Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Clint R Bellenger; Rebecca L Thomson; Eileen Y Robertson; Kade Davison; Maximillian J Nelson; Laura Karavirta; Jonathan D Buckley Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2017-02-11 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Clint R Bellenger; Rebecca L Thomson; Eileen Y Robertson; Kade Davison; Maximillian J Nelson; Laura Karavirta; Jonathan D Buckley Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-09-03 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Maximillian J Nelson; Jonathan D Buckley; Rebecca L Thomson; Clint R Bellenger; Kade Davison Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2021-12-14 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Marija Stojchevska; Bram Steenwinckel; Jonas Van Der Donckt; Mathias De Brouwer; Annelies Goris; Filip De Turck; Sofie Van Hoecke; Femke Ongenae Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2022-10-15 Impact factor: 3.298
Authors: Noah M A d'Unienville; Alison M Hill; Alison M Coates; Catherine Yandell; Maximillian J Nelson; Jonathan D Buckley Journal: BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med Date: 2019-08-07
Authors: Maximillian J Nelson; Jasvir S Bahl; Jonathan D Buckley; Rebecca L Thomson; Kade Davison Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 1.817