Literature DB >> 23562018

Classification of breast tumors using elastographic and B-mode features: comparison of automatic selection of representative slice and physician-selected slice of images.

Woo Kyung Moon1, Shao-Chien Chang, Jung Min Chang, Nariya Cho, Chiun-Sheng Huang, Jen-Wei Kuo, Ruey-Feng Chang.   

Abstract

Inter-observer variability and image quality are two key factors that can affect the diagnostic performance of elastography and B-mode ultrasound for breast tumor characterization. The purpose of this study is to use an image quantification method that automatically chooses a representative slice and then segments the tumor contour to evaluate the diagnostic features for tumor characterization. First, the representative slice is selected based on either the stiffness inside the tumor (the signal-to-noise ratio on the elastogram [SNRe]) or the contrast between the tumor and the surrounding normal tissue (the contrast-to-noise ratio on the elastogram [CNRe]). Next, the level set method is used to segment the tumor contour. Finally, the B-mode and elastographic features related to the segmented tumor are extracted for tumor characterization. The performance of the representative slice selected using the proposed methods is compared to that of the physician-selected slice in 151 biopsy-proven lesions (89 benign and 62 malignant). The diagnostic accuracies using elastographic features are 82.1% (124/151) for the slice with the maximum CNRe value, 82.1% (124/151) for the slice with the maximum SNRe value and 82.8% (125/151) for the physician-selected slice, whereas the diagnostic accuracies using B-mode features are 80.8% (122/151) for the slice with the maximum CNRe value, 87.4% (132/151) for the slice with the maximum SNRe value and 84.1% (127/151) for the physician-selected slice. When using both the B-mode and elastographic features to characterize the tumor, the accuracy of diagnosis is 86.1% (130/151) for the slice with the maximum CNRe value, 90.1% (136/151) for the slice with the maximum SNRe value and 89.4% (135/151) for the physician-selected slice. Our results show that the representative slice selected by SNRe and CNRe could be used to reduce the observer variability and to increase the diagnostic performance by the B-mode and elastographic features.
Copyright © 2013 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23562018     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.01.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  3 in total

Review 1.  Methods for the segmentation and classification of breast ultrasound images: a review.

Authors:  Ademola E Ilesanmi; Utairat Chaumrattanakul; Stanislav S Makhanov
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2021-01-11

2.  Evaluation of a Computer-Aided Diagnosis System in the Classification of Lesions in Breast Strain Elastography Imaging.

Authors:  Karem D Marcomini; Eduardo F C Fleury; Vilmar M Oliveira; Antonio A O Carneiro; Homero Schiabel; Robert M Nishikawa
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-09

Review 3.  Practice guideline for the performance of breast ultrasound elastography.

Authors:  Su Hyun Lee; Jung Min Chang; Nariya Cho; Hye Ryoung Koo; Ann Yi; Seung Ja Kim; Ji Hyun Youk; Eun Ju Son; Seon Hyeong Choi; Shin Ho Kook; Jin Chung; Eun Suk Cha; Jeong Seon Park; Hae Kyoung Jung; Kyung Hee Ko; Hye Young Choi; Eun Bi Ryu; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2013-11-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.