Literature DB >> 23561716

[Cost analysis comparing single-use (Ambu® aScope™) and conventional reusable fiberoptic flexible scopes for difficult tracheal intubation].

M Aïssou1, M Coroir, C Debes, T Camus, N Hadri, C Gutton, M Beaussier.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Recommendations on difficult tracheal intubation constrain each surgical block to have a fiberscope available. Reusable fiberscope presents the problem of availability, the risk of non-conventional infections transmission and the cost. Single-use fiberscopes are presently available (Ambu® aScope™). This medico-economic study aims to assess the cost of using a reusable fiberscope as compared to the single use fiberscope. STUDY
DESIGN: Cost minimization analysis. MATERIAL: Reusable fiberscope Pentax® FB 15P (Pentax France, Argenteuil) and single-use fiberscope Ambu® aScope™ (Ambu A/S, Ballerup, Denmark).
METHOD: Minimization-cost analysis conducted between 2006 and 2012. The amortization cost per utilization for two reusable fiberscopes took into account the acquisition and maintenance costs, as well as the costs related to disinfection. The cost of the single use fiberscope was calculated according to its acquisition cost.
RESULTS: The total cost of the reusable material was 55,874€ over 6years, corresponding to a unitary cost of 206€ per fiberscopy. During this period, 780 sterilizations were carried out for a total cost of 32,611€. Acquisition and maintenance costs were respectively 18,382€ and 4880€. The cost of the single use fiberscope is of 200€ per fiberscopy.
CONCLUSION: This medico-economic evaluation shows that the utilization cost of single use and reusable fiberscopes are very close. This should be analyzed at the light of some benefits of using single use devices for the difficult tracheal intubation.
Copyright © 2013 Société française d’anesthésie et de réanimation (Sfar). Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23561716     DOI: 10.1016/j.annfar.2013.01.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Fr Anesth Reanim        ISSN: 0750-7658


  6 in total

1.  The Cost of Flexible Bronchoscopes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Carina Østervig Andersen; Helena Travis; Emilie Dehlholm-Lambertsen; Rasmus Russell; Emmelie Ploug Jørgensen
Journal:  Pharmacoecon Open       Date:  2022-08-22

2.  Cost analysis of single-use (Ambu® aScope™) and reusable bronchoscopes in the ICU.

Authors:  S Perbet; M Blanquet; C Mourgues; J Delmas; S Bertran; B Longère; V Boïko-Alaux; P Chennell; J-E Bazin; J-M Constantin
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 6.925

3.  Early Assessment of the Likely Cost Effectiveness of Single-Use Flexible Video Bronchoscopes.

Authors:  Christoffer Lilja Terjesen; Julia Kovaleva; Lars Ehlers
Journal:  Pharmacoecon Open       Date:  2017-06

Review 4.  Current State of Surgical Lighting.

Authors:  Jahnavi Curlin; Charles K Herman
Journal:  Surg J (N Y)       Date:  2020-06-19

5.  Implementation of an Anaesthesia Quality Improvement Programme to Reduce Fibreoptic Bronchoscope Repair Incidents.

Authors:  Hsiao-Feng Lu; Kuo-Chuan Hung; Min-Hsien Chiang; Johnson Chia-Shen Yang; Sheng-Dean Luo; Jo-Chi Chin; Chih-Hsien Wang; Cheuk-Kwan Sun; Shao-Chun Wu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-04-12       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Reusable vs disposable nasopharyngolaryngoscopes: Cost analysis and resident survey.

Authors:  Ryan Walczak; Mark Arnold; Jeewanjot Grewal; Xiao Yuan; Amar Suryadevara; Haidy Marzouk
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-12-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.