Literature DB >> 23561622

Role of frozen section analysis of surgical margins during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a 2608-case experience.

Yasuhiro Kakiuchi1, Bonnie Choy, Jennifer Gordetsky, Koji Izumi, Guan Wu, Hani Rashid, Jean V Joseph, Hiroshi Miyamoto.   

Abstract

It remains unanswered whether and how intraoperative frozen section analysis contributes to the surgical margin status on radical prostatectomy specimens. We aimed to determine whether frozen section analysis during radical prostatectomy reduces the incidence of positive surgical margins. We retrospectively analyzed a consecutive series of patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy performed at our institution between 2004 and 2011. We identified 2608 cases, including 1128 (43.3%) where intraoperative frozen section analysis was performed to assess surgical margins. Of the cases with positive (n = 60; 5.3%)/negative (n = 1029; 91.2%)/atypical or indeterminate (n = 39; 3.5%) frozen section analyses, 22 (36.7%)/83 (8.1%)/4 (10.3%) were found to have positive surgical margins on radical prostatectomy specimens, respectively. Thus, 109 (9.7%) of 1128 cases with frozen section analysis had positive surgical margins, compared with 163 (11.0%) of 1480 cases with no frozen section analysis (P = .264). When the patients were subgrouped by histopathologic characteristics, frozen section analysis led to a considerable reduction in the rate of positive surgical margins in cases with biopsy Gleason score 7 (12.4% → 8.7%; P = .087)/8 (28.6% → 16.3%; P = .048)/≥7 (15.3% → 10.1%; P = .012) tumor or pT3b (36.6% → 23.2%; P = .075)/≥pT3b (38.1% → 25.4%; P = .091) disease. Multivariate analysis further revealed that performing frozen section analysis in biopsy Gleason score 7 or higher tumors was an independent predictor of negative surgical margins (odds ratio, 0.61; P = .018). In addition, frozen section analysis of the distal urethra or apex of the prostate (7.5%, P = .035) as well as multiple negative frozen section analyses (≥2: 6.2%, P = .001; ≥4: 2.2%, P = .007) correlated with significantly lower rates of positive surgical margin, compared with no frozen section analysis. Overall, intraoperative frozen section analysis did not dramatically change surgical margin status of radical prostatectomy. Nonetheless, it could be useful in preventing incomplete tumor resection, especially in men with high-grade (Gleason score ≥7) tumor at the apex.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gleason score; Intraoperative frozen section analysis; Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy; Surgical margin; Tumor stage

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23561622     DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2012.12.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  5 in total

1.  Diagnosis of prostate cancer by desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometric imaging of small metabolites and lipids.

Authors:  Shibdas Banerjee; Richard N Zare; Robert J Tibshirani; Christian A Kunder; Rosalie Nolley; Richard Fan; James D Brooks; Geoffrey A Sonn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The Impact of Routine Frozen Section Assessment During Penectomy on Surgical Margin Status and Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes.

Authors:  Alexandra M Danakas; Caroline Bsirini; Hiroshi Miyamoto
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2018-06-03       Impact factor: 3.201

3.  NeuroSAFE robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus standard robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for men with localised prostate cancer (NeuroSAFE PROOF): protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study.

Authors:  Eoin Dinneen; Aiman Haider; Clare Allen; Alex Freeman; Tim Briggs; Senthil Nathan; Chris Brew-Graves; Jack Grierson; Norman R Williams; Raj Persad; Neil Oakley; Jim M Adshead; Hartwig Huland; Alexander Haese; Greg Shaw
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  The value of transperineal apical prostate biopsy in predicting urethral/apical margin status after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jindong Dai; Xingming Zhang; Jinge Zhao; Guangxi Sun; Junru Chen; Jiandong Liu; Ronggui Tao; Hao Zeng; Pengfei Shen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Practice Patterns of Korean Urologists Regarding Positive Surgical Margins after Radical Prostatectomy: a Survey and Narrative Review.

Authors:  Jae Hyun Ryu; Yun Beom Kim; Tae Young Jung; Woo Jin Ko; Sun Il Kim; Dongdeuk Kwon; Duk Yoon Kim; Tae Hee Oh; Tag Keun Yoo
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 2.153

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.