Literature DB >> 23561589

Treatment assignment of high-risk symptomatic severe aortic stenosis patients referred for transcatheter AorticValve implantation.

Kevin R Bainey1, Madhu K Natarajan, Mathew Mercuri, Tony Lai, Kevin Teoh, Victor Chu, Richard P Whitlock, James L Velianou.   

Abstract

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become an option for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis whose co-morbidities place them at high surgical risk. However, little is known regarding treatment allocation. From May 2008 to May 2011, all high-risk patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis referred to an experienced single-center TAVI clinic were reviewed. A total of 170 consecutive patients were evaluated. Of these, 58 (34%) were accepted for TAVI (mean age 81 ± 8 years). Thirty-three patients (19%) were accepted for conventional aortic valve replacement (AVR; mean age 83 ± 6 years). Sixty-two patients (37%) were treated conservatively (mean age 83 ± 6 years). Seventeen patients (10%) died awaiting complete assessment. At 30 days, all-cause mortality was 10% in the TAVI group, 3% in the conventional AVR group, and 32% in the conservatively treated group. Multivariate-adjustment identified the absence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (hazard ratio 0.30, 95% confidence interval 0.09 to 0.98, p <0.05) and the absence of frailty (hazard ratio 0.19, 95% confidence interval 0.07 to 0.55, p <0.01) as independent predictors of conventional AVR. In conclusion, of the high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis referred for TAVI at a large single center, approximately 1/2 were accepted for intervention (conventional AVR or TAVI), and roughly 1/3 were treated conservatively.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23561589     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.02.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  6 in total

1.  Experience of a high-risk aortic valve clinic in Ireland.

Authors:  K E O'Sullivan; S A Early; I Casserly; Z Chugtai; D Sugrue; J Hurley
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 2.  Measuring frailty using claims data for pharmacoepidemiologic studies of mortality in older adults: evidence and recommendations.

Authors:  Dae Hyun Kim; Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 2.890

3.  Treating Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Is There Time to Wait?

Authors:  Kamil F Faridi; Robert W Yeh; Marie-France Poulin
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 5.501

4.  Association Between Wait Time for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Early Postprocedural Outcomes.

Authors:  Gabby Elbaz-Greener; Brianne Yarranton; Feng Qiu; David A Wood; John G Webb; Stephen E Fremes; Sam Radhakrishnan; Harindra C Wijeysundera
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 5.501

5.  Impact of procedural capacity on transcatheter aortic valve replacement wait times and outcomes: a study of regional variation in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Kayley A Henning; Mithunan Ravindran; Feng Qiu; Neil P Fam; Tej N Seth; Peter C Austin; Harindra C Wijeysundera
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2020-05

6.  Management of elective aortic valve replacement over the long term in the era of COVID-19.

Authors:  Craig Basman; Chad A Kliger; Luigi Pirelli; S Jacob Scheinerman
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.191

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.