Literature DB >> 23561229

Efficacy and safety of levomilnacipran sustained release 40 mg, 80 mg, or 120 mg in major depressive disorder: a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Gregory M Asnis1, Anjana Bose, Carl P Gommoll, Changzheng Chen, William M Greenberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of fixed-dose levomilnacipran sustained release (SR) compared with placebo in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD); the study was conducted from September 2009-May 2011.
METHOD: Outpatients met DSM-IV-TR criteria for MDD with an ongoing major depressive episode ≥ 8 weeks' duration. After a 1-week placebo lead-in, patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo (n = 179) or levomilnacipran SR 40 mg (n = 181), 80 mg (n = 181), or 120 mg (n = 183) once daily for 8 weeks of double-blind treatment, followed by a 2-week double-blind down-taper. The primary efficacy parameter was change from baseline on the clinician-rated Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score. The prespecified secondary efficacy parameter was change from baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) total score. Additional efficacy measures included the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS(17)) and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) and -Improvement (CGI-I). Safety and tolerability were also evaluated.
RESULTS: The least squares mean difference (LSMD) for change from baseline in MADRS total score was significantly superior to placebo for all dose groups: -3.23 (P = .0186), -3.99 (P = .0038), and -4.86 (P = .0005) for levomilnacipran SR 40, 80, and 120 mg, respectively. The LSMD was significantly different for levomilnacipran SR 80 mg and 120 mg versus placebo on the SDS (-2.51 and -2.57, respectively, P < .05 for both doses), HDRS(17) (-2.09 and -2.34, respectively, P < .05 for both doses), CGI-S (-0.43 [P < .01] and -0.35 [P < .05], respectively), and CGI-I (-0.34 and -0.32, respectively, P < .05 for both doses) assessments. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (≥ 10% of any treatment group) were headache, nausea, constipation, dry mouth, increased heart rate, and hyperhidrosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Levomilnacipran SR demonstrated significant improvement in depressive symptoms and functioning relative to placebo. In this study, levomilnacipran SR was generally well tolerated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00969709. © Copyright 2013 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23561229     DOI: 10.4088/JCP.12m08197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-6689            Impact factor:   4.384


  29 in total

Review 1.  Problems in the Descriptions of the Psychiatric Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria in Publications of Antidepressant Efficacy Trials: A Qualitative Review and Recommendations for Improved Clarity.

Authors:  Mark Zimmerman; Matthew Multach; Emily Walsh; Lia K Rosenstein; Douglas Gazarian; Heather L Clark
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 5.749

2.  Evaluation of Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4-Based Interactions of Levomilnacipran with Ketoconazole, Carbamazepine or Alprazolam in Healthy Subjects.

Authors:  Laishun Chen; Ramesh Boinpally; Nayra Gad; William M Greenberg; Julie Wangsa; Antonia Periclou; Parviz Ghahramani
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.859

3.  A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of Levomilnacipran ER 40-120mg/day for Prevention of Relapse in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder.

Authors:  Thomas Shiovitz; William M Greenberg; Changzheng Chen; Giovanna Forero; Carl P Gommoll
Journal:  Innov Clin Neurosci       Date:  2014-01

Review 4.  The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.

Authors:  Alan F Schatzberg; DeBattista Charles
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  2018-01-15

Review 5.  Levomilnacipran extended release: first global approval.

Authors:  Philip Hair; Fiona Cameron; Karly P Garnock-Jones
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Effect of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of levomilnacipran following a single oral dose of a levomilnacipran extended-release capsule in human participants.

Authors:  Laishun Chen; Ramesh Boinpally; William M Greenberg; Julie Wangsa; Antonia Periclou; Parviz Ghahramani
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 7.  Levomilnacipran extended-release: a review of its use in adult patients with major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Lesley J Scott
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 5.749

8.  Improved cyclopropanation activity of histidine-ligated cytochrome P450 enables the enantioselective formal synthesis of levomilnacipran.

Authors:  Z Jane Wang; Hans Renata; Nicole E Peck; Christopher C Farwell; Pedro S Coelho; Frances H Arnold
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 15.336

9.  Levomilnacipran Extended-Release Treatment in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder: Improvements in Functional Impairment Categories.

Authors:  Andrew J Cutler; Carl P Gommoll; Changzheng Chen; William M Greenberg; Adam Ruth
Journal:  Prim Care Companion CNS Disord       Date:  2015-06-11

10.  Levomilnacipran ER 40 mg and 80 mg in patients with major depressive disorder: a phase III, randomized, double-blind, fixed-dose, placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  David Bakish; Anjana Bose; Carl Gommoll; Changzheng Chen; Rene Nunez; William M Greenberg; Michael Liebowitz; Arif Khan
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 6.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.