Literature DB >> 23560654

Could minors be living kidney donors? A systematic review of guidelines, position papers and reports.

Kristof Thys1, Kristof Van Assche, Hélène Nobile, Marion Siebelink, Isabelle Aujoulat, Paul Schotsmans, Fabienne Dobbels, Pascal Borry.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to systematically review guidelines, position papers, and reports on living kidney donation by minors. We systematically searched the databases such as Medline, Embase, ISI Web of knowledge, Google scholar as well as the websites of various bioethics committees, transplant organizations and societies. Guidelines were included if they provided recommendations for or against living kidney donation by minors. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. We included 39 documents in this study. Twenty seven of these endorse an absolute prohibition of living kidney donation by minors, because of concerns regarding the decision-making capacity of minors, the impartiality of parental authorization, the best interests of the minor, and the necessity of the donation. Twelve guidelines, however, would exceptionally allow living kidney donation by minors, provided that adequate safeguards are put in place, including an assessment of the minor's autonomy and maturity, authorization by an independent body, assuring that the anticipated psychosocial benefits outweigh the medical and psychosocial risks for the donor and the restriction to situations of last resort. A more adequate medical and psychosocial follow-up of living kidney donors may likely contribute to a more unified approach towards living kidney donation by minors.
© 2013 The Authors Transplant International © 2013 European Society for Organ Transplantation. Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  kidney donation; living donation; pediatric donation and transplantation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23560654     DOI: 10.1111/tri.12097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transpl Int        ISSN: 0934-0874            Impact factor:   3.782


  6 in total

1.  [Renal transplantation: Opportunities and risks for medical refugees].

Authors:  D Mammadova; K Hirsch; B Schwaiger; B Wullich; W Rascher
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Care of Living Kidney Donors.

Authors:  Krista L Lentine; Bertram L Kasiske; Andrew S Levey; Patricia L Adams; Josefina Alberú; Mohamed A Bakr; Lorenzo Gallon; Catherine A Garvey; Sandeep Guleria; Philip Kam-Tao Li; Dorry L Segev; Sandra J Taler; Kazunari Tanabe; Linda Wright; Martin G Zeier; Michael Cheung; Amit X Garg
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  The Outcomes of Living Kidney Donation from Medically Complex Donors: Implications for the Donor and the Recipient.

Authors:  Matthew Niemi; Didier A Mandelbrot
Journal:  Curr Transplant Rep       Date:  2014-03-01

4.  How to tackle the conundrum of quality appraisal in systematic reviews of normative literature/information? Analysing the problems of three possible strategies (translation of a German paper).

Authors:  Marcel Mertz
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  Donor Autonomy and Self-Sacrifice in Living Organ Donation: An Ethical Legal and Psychological Aspects of Transplantation (ELPAT) View.

Authors:  Nizam Mamode; Kristof Van Assche; Lisa Burnapp; Aisling Courtney; David van Dellen; Mireille Houthoff; Hannah Maple; Greg Moorlock; Frank J M F Dor; Annette Lennerling
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 3.782

Review 6.  Current state of ethics literature synthesis: a systematic review of reviews.

Authors:  Marcel Mertz; Hannes Kahrass; Daniel Strech
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 8.775

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.