BACKGROUND: Chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated dressings have become widely adopted as a means to reduce the risk for catheter-associated bloodstream infections. These dressings release antiseptic under occlusion onto the skin surrounding catheter insertion sites. Although chlorhexidine gluconate is a known cause of contact dermatitis, the phenotypic range of this adverse effect of chlorhexidine gluconate–impregnated dressings in critically ill patients has not been described. OBSERVATIONS: We report 7 cases of erosive irritant contact dermatitis due to chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated transparent dressings. Six of these patients were children (age range, 4 months to 2 years); the adult was a critically ill 62-year-old man. Four patients were immunosuppressed after solid organ transplant and all were receiving blood pressure support at the time of this reaction. The insertion sites of femoral catheters were involved in all but 1 case; 3 catheter sites were involved in the adult patient. Results of extensive infectious workups were negative. All lesions resolved with discontinuation of the chlorhexidine gluconate-containing dressings, local wound care, and alternative antimicrobial dressings. CONCLUSIONS: Erosive contact dermatitis is an under-recognized complication of chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated dressings. Health care providers should be aware of this risk, particularly in young children and immunosuppressed and/or critically ill patients, who may be more susceptible to the irritant effects of these dressings. When the dressings are used, patients should be monitored closely for skin breakdown.
BACKGROUND:Chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated dressings have become widely adopted as a means to reduce the risk for catheter-associated bloodstream infections. These dressings release antiseptic under occlusion onto the skin surrounding catheter insertion sites. Although chlorhexidine gluconate is a known cause of contact dermatitis, the phenotypic range of this adverse effect of chlorhexidine gluconate–impregnated dressings in critically ill patients has not been described. OBSERVATIONS: We report 7 cases of erosive irritant contact dermatitis due to chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated transparent dressings. Six of these patients were children (age range, 4 months to 2 years); the adult was a critically ill 62-year-old man. Four patients were immunosuppressed after solid organ transplant and all were receiving blood pressure support at the time of this reaction. The insertion sites of femoral catheters were involved in all but 1 case; 3 catheter sites were involved in the adult patient. Results of extensive infectious workups were negative. All lesions resolved with discontinuation of the chlorhexidine gluconate-containing dressings, local wound care, and alternative antimicrobial dressings. CONCLUSIONS: Erosive contact dermatitis is an under-recognized complication of chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated dressings. Health care providers should be aware of this risk, particularly in young children and immunosuppressed and/or critically ill patients, who may be more susceptible to the irritant effects of these dressings. When the dressings are used, patients should be monitored closely for skin breakdown.
Authors: Blythe H Philips; Marcus J Crim; F Claire Hankenson; Earl K Steffen; Peter S Klein; Angela K Brice; Anthony J Carty Journal: J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 1.232
Authors: Arne Simon; Rhoikos Furtwängler; Norbert Graf; Hans Jürgen Laws; Sebastian Voigt; Brar Piening; Christine Geffers; Philipp Agyeman; Roland A Ammann Journal: GMS Hyg Infect Control Date: 2016-05-12
Authors: Claire M Rickard; Nicole M Marsh; Joan Webster; Nicole C Gavin; Raymond J Chan; Alexandra L McCarthy; Peter Mollee; Amanda J Ullman; Tricia Kleidon; Vineet Chopra; Li Zhang; Matthew R McGrail; Emily Larsen; Md Abu Choudhury; Samantha Keogh; Evan Alexandrou; David J McMillan; Merehau Cindy Mervin; David L Paterson; Marie Cooke; Gillian Ray-Barruel; Maria Isabel Castillo; Andrew Hallahan; Amanda Corley; E Geoffrey Playford Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-06-15 Impact factor: 2.692