BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Renal denervation (RDN) has been shown to be effective in reducing BP in treatment-resistant hypertension. Measurement of the renal and sympathetic activity revealed a decrease in sympathetic drive to the kidney and small resistance vessels after RDN. However, the consequences on renal perfusion and renal vascular resistance (RVR), as well as central hemodynamics, are unknown. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Nineteen patients with treatment-resistant hypertension (office BP≥140/90 mmHg, despite at least three antihypertensive drugs [including a diuretic], and diagnosis confirmed by 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring) underwent RDN between January and October 2011. Renal perfusion and RVR were noninvasively assessed by magnetic resonance imaging with arterial spin labeling, and renal function was assessed by estimating GFR before (day -1), after (day +1), and again after 3 months of RDN. Central hemodynamics was assessed using pulse wave analysis at day -1 and after 6 months of RDN. RESULTS: Peripheral office BP (systolic, 158±26 versus 142±23 mmHg, P=0.002; diastolic, 83±13 versus 76±9 mmHg, P=0.02) and mean systolic 24-hour ambulatory BP (159±17 versus 152±17 mmHg, P=0.02) were significantly reduced 6 months after RDN. Renal perfusion was not statistically different between day -1 and day +1 (256.8 [interquartile range (IQR), 241-278] versus 263.4 [IQR, 252-277] ml/min per 100 g; P=0.17) as well as after 3 months (256.8 [IQR, 241-278] versus 261.2 [IQR, 240-285] ml/min per 100 g; P=0.27) after RDN. RVR dropped (432.1 [IQR, 359-525] versus 390.6 [IQR, 338-461] AU; P=0.02), whereas renal function was not statistically different at any time point. Central systolic BP (145±31 versus 131±28 mmHg; P=0.009), diastolic BP (85±18 versus 80±14 mmHg; P=0.03), and central pulse pressure (61±18 versus 52±18 mmHg; P=0.02) were significantly reduced 6 months after RDN. Central augmentation index (24±8 versus 20±8%; P=0.02) was decreased 6 months after RDN. CONCLUSION: The data indicate that RDN significantly reduced peripheral and central BP. Despite reduced systemic BP, renal perfusion and function did not change after RDN.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Renal denervation (RDN) has been shown to be effective in reducing BP in treatment-resistant hypertension. Measurement of the renal and sympathetic activity revealed a decrease in sympathetic drive to the kidney and small resistance vessels after RDN. However, the consequences on renal perfusion and renal vascular resistance (RVR), as well as central hemodynamics, are unknown. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Nineteen patients with treatment-resistant hypertension (office BP≥140/90 mmHg, despite at least three antihypertensive drugs [including a diuretic], and diagnosis confirmed by 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring) underwent RDN between January and October 2011. Renal perfusion and RVR were noninvasively assessed by magnetic resonance imaging with arterial spin labeling, and renal function was assessed by estimating GFR before (day -1), after (day +1), and again after 3 months of RDN. Central hemodynamics was assessed using pulse wave analysis at day -1 and after 6 months of RDN. RESULTS: Peripheral office BP (systolic, 158±26 versus 142±23 mmHg, P=0.002; diastolic, 83±13 versus 76±9 mmHg, P=0.02) and mean systolic 24-hour ambulatory BP (159±17 versus 152±17 mmHg, P=0.02) were significantly reduced 6 months after RDN. Renal perfusion was not statistically different between day -1 and day +1 (256.8 [interquartile range (IQR), 241-278] versus 263.4 [IQR, 252-277] ml/min per 100 g; P=0.17) as well as after 3 months (256.8 [IQR, 241-278] versus 261.2 [IQR, 240-285] ml/min per 100 g; P=0.27) after RDN. RVR dropped (432.1 [IQR, 359-525] versus 390.6 [IQR, 338-461] AU; P=0.02), whereas renal function was not statistically different at any time point. Central systolic BP (145±31 versus 131±28 mmHg; P=0.009), diastolic BP (85±18 versus 80±14 mmHg; P=0.03), and central pulse pressure (61±18 versus 52±18 mmHg; P=0.02) were significantly reduced 6 months after RDN. Central augmentation index (24±8 versus 20±8%; P=0.02) was decreased 6 months after RDN. CONCLUSION: The data indicate that RDN significantly reduced peripheral and central BP. Despite reduced systemic BP, renal perfusion and function did not change after RDN.
Authors: Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-05-14 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Aghogho Odudu; Fabio Nery; Anita A Harteveld; Roger G Evans; Douglas Pendse; Charlotte E Buchanan; Susan T Francis; María A Fernández-Seara Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: E E Vink; A Boer; W L Verloop; W Spiering; M Voskuil; E Vonken; J M Hoogduin; T Leiner; M L Bots; P J Blankestijn Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-01-18 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Sebastian Ewen; Christian Ukena; Dominik Linz; Roland E Schmieder; Michael Böhm; Felix Mahfoud Journal: Curr Hypertens Rep Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 5.369
Authors: Sabine J Bischoff; Martin Schmidt; Thomas Lehmann; Matthias Schwab; Georg Matziolis; Alexander Saemann; René Schiffner Journal: Physiol Rep Date: 2015-11
Authors: Hitesh C Patel; Carl Hayward; Vassilis Vassiliou; Ketna Patel; James P Howard; Carlo Di Mario Journal: Integr Blood Press Control Date: 2015-12-03