PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy and reproducibility of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) MRI scar quantification using visual sub-segmental analysis (VSSA) versus signal threshold-based analysis in ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One-hundredsixty-one patients with abnormal LGE imaging underwent VSSA and signal threshold-based analysis. VSSA was performed using a 68 sub-segmental model. Signal threshold-based analysis was performed using cutoffs of ≥2, ≥3, and ≥5 standard deviations (SD) above the mean signal of normal myocardium. Comparison of VSSA and signal threshold-based analysis was performed by linear regression and Bland Altman plots. RESULTS: Seventy (44%) patients had ischemic scar, 76 (47%) had nonischemic scar, and 15 (9%) had a combined pattern. Correlation coefficients for VSSA versus signal threshold-based analysis at ≥2, ≥3, and ≥5SD thresholds were r = 0.63, r = 0.79, r = 0.81 (P < 0.001) for all patients, r = 0.74, r = 0.81, r = 0.81 (P < 0.001) in those with ischemic scar, and r = 0.46, r = 0.69, r = 0.72 (P < 0.001) in those with nonischemic scar. Bland Altman analysis revealed no significant bias in total scar volume among all patients (-4.3 ± 7.9%), those with ischemic scar (-4.8 ± 7.8%), or those with nonischemic scar (-2.6 ± 7.6%). Intra-observer and inter-observer variability of the VSSA technique was excellent with a mean difference in total percent scar of 0.3% (-8.3-8.9%) and -0.4% (-9.5-8.5%), respectively. CONCLUSION: A VSSA-based model of myocardial scar quantification is accurate and reproducible in ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy and reproducibility of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) MRI scar quantification using visual sub-segmental analysis (VSSA) versus signal threshold-based analysis in ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One-hundred sixty-one patients with abnormal LGE imaging underwent VSSA and signal threshold-based analysis. VSSA was performed using a 68 sub-segmental model. Signal threshold-based analysis was performed using cutoffs of ≥2, ≥3, and ≥5 standard deviations (SD) above the mean signal of normal myocardium. Comparison of VSSA and signal threshold-based analysis was performed by linear regression and Bland Altman plots. RESULTS: Seventy (44%) patients had ischemic scar, 76 (47%) had nonischemic scar, and 15 (9%) had a combined pattern. Correlation coefficients for VSSA versus signal threshold-based analysis at ≥2, ≥3, and ≥5SD thresholds were r = 0.63, r = 0.79, r = 0.81 (P < 0.001) for all patients, r = 0.74, r = 0.81, r = 0.81 (P < 0.001) in those with ischemic scar, and r = 0.46, r = 0.69, r = 0.72 (P < 0.001) in those with nonischemic scar. Bland Altman analysis revealed no significant bias in total scar volume among all patients (-4.3 ± 7.9%), those with ischemic scar (-4.8 ± 7.8%), or those with nonischemic scar (-2.6 ± 7.6%). Intra-observer and inter-observer variability of the VSSA technique was excellent with a mean difference in total percent scar of 0.3% (-8.3-8.9%) and -0.4% (-9.5-8.5%), respectively. CONCLUSION: A VSSA-based model of myocardial scar quantification is accurate and reproducible in ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy.
Authors: Dimitrios Maragiannis; Paulino A Alvarez; Mohamad G Ghosn; Karen Chin; Jeremy J Hinojosa; John M Buergler; Dipan J Shah; Sherif F Nagueh Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2017-07-26 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Golnaz Roshankar; Geneva C White; Sebastien Cadet; Nowell M Fine; Denise Chan; James A White; Victor Jimenez-Zepeda; Piotr J Slomka; Robert J H Miller Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2021-10-03 Impact factor: 3.872
Authors: Mohammad A Khan; Eric Y Yang; Duc T Nguyen; Faisal Nabi; Jeremy Hinojosa; Maria Jabel; Sherif F Nagueh; Edward A Graviss; Dipan J Shah Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2020-07-15 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Eric Y Yang; Mohamad G Ghosn; Mohammad A Khan; Nickalaus L Gramze; Gerd Brunner; Faisal Nabi; Vijay Nambi; Sherif F Nagueh; Duc T Nguyen; Edward A Graviss; Erik B Schelbert; Christie M Ballantyne; William A Zoghbi; Dipan J Shah Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2019-12-16 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Laura E Dobson; Tarique A Musa; Akhlaque Uddin; Timothy A Fairbairn; Owen J Bebb; Peter P Swoboda; Philip Haaf; James Foley; Pankaj Garg; Graham J Fent; Christopher J Malkin; Daniel J Blackman; Sven Plein; John P Greenwood Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2017-02-22 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Maan Malahfji; Alpana Senapati; Bhupendar Tayal; Duc T Nguyen; Edward A Graviss; Sherif F Nagueh; Michael J Reardon; Miguel Quinones; William A Zoghbi; Dipan J Shah Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2020-11-26 Impact factor: 5.501