INTRODUCTION: The decision on thrombolytics administration is usually based on a generalized, rigid time-based rule rather than an individualized evaluation of the "tissue at risk of infarction" which is the target of the recanalization therapies. The goals of our article are to assess whether there is tissue at risk of infarction in a group of acute stroke patients treated beyond 8 h after symptom onset and to investigate the baseline imaging and clinical features that predict the fate of this tissue at risk. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a series of patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with endovascular recanalization therapies beyond 8 h after symptom onset. The tissue at risk was calculated as the difference between the infarct volumes on baseline and follow-up imaging (infarct growth). We analyzed the epidemiological distribution of infarct growth, and we performed a multivariate regression analysis to identify the baseline variables that predict infarct growth. RESULTS: Our study group included 75 patients (65 ± 13.8 years, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 14 ± 4.9, time to treatment 15.2 ± 8.7 h). The mean infarct growth was 78.6 ± 95.0 cc (p < 0.001), and, overall, the infarct growth was greater when the baseline volume of infarct tissue was small (p < 0.001) and in the case of a unsuccessful arterial recanalization (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is potentially salvageable ischemic tissue at risk in acute stroke patients treated beyond 8 h after symptom onset.
INTRODUCTION: The decision on thrombolytics administration is usually based on a generalized, rigid time-based rule rather than an individualized evaluation of the "tissue at risk of infarction" which is the target of the recanalization therapies. The goals of our article are to assess whether there is tissue at risk of infarction in a group of acute strokepatients treated beyond 8 h after symptom onset and to investigate the baseline imaging and clinical features that predict the fate of this tissue at risk. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a series of patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with endovascular recanalization therapies beyond 8 h after symptom onset. The tissue at risk was calculated as the difference between the infarct volumes on baseline and follow-up imaging (infarct growth). We analyzed the epidemiological distribution of infarct growth, and we performed a multivariate regression analysis to identify the baseline variables that predict infarct growth. RESULTS: Our study group included 75 patients (65 ± 13.8 years, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 14 ± 4.9, time to treatment 15.2 ± 8.7 h). The mean infarct growth was 78.6 ± 95.0 cc (p < 0.001), and, overall, the infarct growth was greater when the baseline volume of infarct tissue was small (p < 0.001) and in the case of a unsuccessful arterial recanalization (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is potentially salvageable ischemic tissue at risk in acute strokepatients treated beyond 8 h after symptom onset.
Authors: S J Read; T Hirano; D F Abbott; R Markus; J I Sachinidis; H J Tochon-Danguy; J G Chan; G F Egan; A M Scott; C F Bladin; W J McKay; G A Donnan Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: A Zangerle; S Kiechl; M Spiegel; M Furtner; M Knoflach; P Werner; A Mair; G Wille; C Schmidauer; K Gautsch; T Gotwald; S Felber; W Poewe; J Willeit Journal: Neurology Date: 2007-01-02 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Anthony J Furlan; Dirk Eyding; Gregory W Albers; Yasir Al-Rawi; Kennedy R Lees; Howard A Rowley; Christian Sachara; Mariola Soehngen; Steven Warach; Werner Hacke Journal: Stroke Date: 2006-03-30 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Werner Hacke; Greg Albers; Yasir Al-Rawi; Julien Bogousslavsky; Antonio Davalos; Michael Eliasziw; Michael Fischer; Anthony Furlan; Markku Kaste; Kennedy R Lees; Mariola Soehngen; Steven Warach Journal: Stroke Date: 2004-11-29 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Wade S Smith; Michael H Lev; Joey D English; Erica C Camargo; Maggie Chou; S Claiborne Johnston; Gilberto Gonzalez; Pamela W Schaefer; William P Dillon; Walter J Koroshetz; Karen L Furie Journal: Stroke Date: 2009-10-15 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Tudor G Jovin; Howard Yonas; James M Gebel; Emanuel Kanal; Yue Fang Chang; Stephen Z Grahovac; Steven Goldstein; Lawrence R Wechsler Journal: Stroke Date: 2003-09-18 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: S J Read; T Hirano; D F Abbott; J I Sachinidis; H J Tochon-Danguy; J G Chan; G F Egan; A M Scott; C F Bladin; W J McKay; G A Donnan Journal: Neurology Date: 1998-12 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Maarten G Lansberg; Carlo W Cereda; Michael Mlynash; Nishant K Mishra; Manabu Inoue; Stephanie Kemp; Søren Christensen; Matus Straka; Greg Zaharchuk; Michael P Marks; Roland Bammer; Gregory W Albers Journal: Neurology Date: 2015-07-29 Impact factor: 9.910