Literature DB >> 23559064

Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the assessment of motor cortex excitability and treatment of drug-resistant major depression.

C Spampinato1, E Aguglia, C Concerto, M Pennisi, G Lanza, R Bella, M Cantone, G Pennisi, I Kavasidis, D Giordano.   

Abstract

Major depression is one of the leading causes of disabling condition worldwide and its treatment is often challenging and unsatisfactory, since many patients become refractory to pharmacological therapies. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a noninvasive neurophysiological investigation mainly used to study the integrity of the primary motor cortex excitability and of the cortico-spinal tract. The development of paired-pulse and repetitive TMS (rTMS) paradigms has allowed investigators to explore the pathophysiology of depressive disorders and other neuropsychiatric diseases linked to brain excitability dysfunctions. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation has also therapeutic and rehabilitative capabilities since it is able to induce changes in the excitability of inhibitory and excitatory neuronal networks that may persist in time. However, the therapeutic effects of rTMS on major depression have been demonstrated by analyzing only the improvement of neuropsychological performance. The aim of this study was to investigate cortical excitability changes on 12 chronically-medicated depressed patients (test group) after rTMS treatment and to correlate neurophysiological findings to neuropsychological outcomes. In detail, we assessed different parameters of cortical excitability before and after active rTMS in the test group, then compared to those of 10 age-matched depressed patients (control group) who underwent sham rTMS. In line with previous studies, at baseline both groups exhibited a significant interhemispheric difference of motor cortex excitability. This neurophysiological imbalance was then reduced in the patients treated with active rTMS, resulting also in a clinical benefit as demonstrated by the improvement in neuropsychological test scores. On the contrary, after sham rTMS, the interhemispheric difference was still evident in the control group. The reported clinical benefits in the test group might be related to the plastic remodeling of synaptic connection induced by rTMS treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23559064     DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2013.2256432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng        ISSN: 1534-4320            Impact factor:   3.802


  20 in total

Review 1.  Neuronal networks in mental diseases and neuropathic pain: Beyond brain derived neurotrophic factor and collapsin response mediator proteins.

Authors:  Tam T Quach; Jessica K Lerch; Jerome Honnorat; Rajesh Khanna; Anne-Marie Duchemin
Journal:  World J Psychiatry       Date:  2016-03-22

Review 2.  Assessing the mechanisms of brain plasticity by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Ali Jannati; Lindsay M Oberman; Alexander Rotenberg; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 8.294

3.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-traumatic stress disorder: Lights and shadows.

Authors:  Carmen Concerto; Giuseppe Lanza; Francesco Fisicaro; Manuela Pennisi; Alessandro Rodolico; Giulia Torrisi; Rita Bella; Eugenio Aguglia
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 1.534

4.  Use of the Temperament and Character Inventory to Predict Response to Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Major Depression.

Authors:  Shan H Siddiqi; Ravikumar Chockalingam; C Robert Cloninger; Eric J Lenze; Pilar Cristancho
Journal:  J Psychiatr Pract       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.325

5.  More female patients and fewer stimuli per session are associated with the short-term antidepressant properties of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): a meta-analysis of 54 sham-controlled studies published between 1997-2013.

Authors:  Karina Karolina Kedzior; Valeriya Azorina; Sarah Kim Reitz
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 2.570

6.  Excitability of the motor cortex in de novo patients with celiac disease.

Authors:  Giovanni Pennisi; Giuseppe Lanza; Salvatore Giuffrida; Luisa Vinciguerra; Valentina Puglisi; Mariagiovanna Cantone; Manuela Pennisi; Carmela Cinzia D'Agate; Pietro Naso; Giuseppe Aprile; Giulia Malaguarnera; Raffaele Ferri; Rita Bella
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Different patterns of cortical excitability in major depression and vascular depression: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  Carmen Concerto; Giuseppe Lanza; Mariagiovanna Cantone; Manuela Pennisi; Daniela Giordano; Concetto Spampinato; Riccardo Ricceri; Giovanni Pennisi; Eugenio Aguglia; Rita Bella
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 8.  A systematic review of non-motor rTMS induced motor cortex plasticity.

Authors:  Grégory Nordmann; Valeriya Azorina; Berthold Langguth; Martin Schecklmann
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Preserved transcallosal inhibition to transcranial magnetic stimulation in nondemented elderly patients with leukoaraiosis.

Authors:  Giuseppe Lanza; Rita Bella; Salvatore Giuffrida; Mariagiovanna Cantone; Giovanni Pennisi; Concetto Spampinato; Daniela Giordano; Giulia Malaguarnera; Alberto Raggi; Manuela Pennisi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Changes in motor cortex excitability associated with temporal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in tinnitus: hints for cross-modal plasticity?

Authors:  Martin Schecklmann; Michael Landgrebe; Tobias Kleinjung; Elmar Frank; Philipp G Sand; Rainer Rupprecht; Peter Eichhammer; Göran Hajak; Berthold Langguth
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.