Xinling Ren1, Qun Liu, Wen Chen, Guijin Zhu, Hanwang Zhang. 1. Reproductive Medicine Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the effect of assisted hatching (AH) site on the clinical outcomes in vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles. METHODS: A total of 160 women who underwent vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles were randomized to either the ICM group (AH performing at the site near the inner cell mess, ICM), or the TE group (AH performing at the site opposite to the ICM). AH with laser zona drilling was performed 20 or 30 min after thawing once the ICM can be detected. Clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, live birth rate and the occurrence rate of monozygotic twins (MZT) pregnancy after transfer of these two groups were compared. RESULTS: No significant difference was found in the clinical pregnancy rate (63.8% vs. 67.5%), implantation rate (51.7% vs. 53.6%) and live birth rate (57.5% vs. 62.5%) between the ICM group and the TE group. The occurrence rate of MZT was comparable between the two groups (3.9% vs. 5.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The site of assisted hatching has no influence on the implantation, pregnancy and live birth rate in human vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To assess the effect of assisted hatching (AH) site on the clinical outcomes in vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles. METHODS: A total of 160 women who underwent vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles were randomized to either the ICM group (AH performing at the site near the inner cell mess, ICM), or the TE group (AH performing at the site opposite to the ICM). AH with laser zona drilling was performed 20 or 30 min after thawing once the ICM can be detected. Clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, live birth rate and the occurrence rate of monozygotic twins (MZT) pregnancy after transfer of these two groups were compared. RESULTS: No significant difference was found in the clinical pregnancy rate (63.8% vs. 67.5%), implantation rate (51.7% vs. 53.6%) and live birth rate (57.5% vs. 62.5%) between the ICM group and the TE group. The occurrence rate of MZT was comparable between the two groups (3.9% vs. 5.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The site of assisted hatching has no influence on the implantation, pregnancy and live birth rate in human vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles.
Authors: Ernest Hung Yu Ng; Estella Yee Lan Lau; William Shu Biu Yeung; Tak Ming Cheung; Oi Shan Tang; Pak Chung Ho Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2007-07-26 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Inna V Ilina; Yulia V Khramova; Anna D Ivanova; Maxim A Filatov; Yuliya Yu Silaeva; Alexey V Deykin; Dmitry S Sitnikov Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2020-11-17 Impact factor: 3.412