Literature DB >> 2355873

A new method to evaluate clinical performance and critical incidents in anaesthesia: quantification of daily comments by teachers.

M F Rhoton1.   

Abstract

We have found that the Clinical Anesthesia System of Evaluation (CASE) method provides information regarding clinical performance of residents and critical incidents that is not available from other sources. As a result, it expands the dimensions of the evaluation process and improves validity. In addition, the technique has helped address the concerns of many investigators. (1) It provides specific, real-time evaluations that permit early intervention, improve feedback and guide remediation; (2) it improves sampling techniques by increasing the breadth and volume of evaluators and settings; (3) it enhances the discriminatory power of the evaluation process; and (4) it improves documentation.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2355873     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1990.tb00013.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  4 in total

Review 1.  Anaesthesia and education.

Authors:  C Eagle
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 5.063

2.  Effective teaching behaviours of rural family medicine preceptors.

Authors:  J Goertzen; M Stewart; W Weston
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-07-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  The experiential curriculum: an alternate model for anaesthesia education.

Authors:  W A Tweed; N Donen
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  Exploring reflective 'critical incident' documentation of professionalism lapses in a medical undergraduate setting.

Authors:  David Hodges; John C McLachlan; Gabrielle M Finn
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 2.463

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.