PURPOSE: In a retrospective analysis, adjuvant intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) combined with modern chemotherapy improved advanced gastric cancer survival rates compared to a combination of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) and conventional chemotherapy. We report on the long-term outcomes of two consecutive patient cohorts that were treated with either IMRT and intensive chemotherapy, or 3D-CRT and conventional chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2001 and 2008, 65 consecutive gastric cancer patients received either 3D-CRT (n = 27) or IMRT (n = 38) following tumor resection. Chemotherapy comprised predominantly 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (5-FU/FA) in the earlier cohort and capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) in the latter. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: Median OS times were 18 and 43 months in the 3D-CRT and IMRT groups, respectively (p = 0.0602). Actuarial 5-year OS rates were 26 and 47 %, respectively. Within the IMRT group, XELOX gave better results than 5-FU/FA in terms of OS, but this difference was not statistically significant. The primary cause of death in both groups was distant metastasis. Median DFS times were 14 and 35 months in the 3D-CRT and IMRT groups, respectively (p = 0.0693). Actuarial 5-year DFS rates were 22 and 44 %, respectively. Among patients receiving 5-FU/FA, DFS tended to be better in the IMRT group, but this was not statistically significant. A similar analysis for the XELOX group was not possible as 3D-CRT was almost never used to treat these patients. No late toxicity exceeding grade 3 or secondary tumors were observed. CONCLUSION: After a median follow-up period of over 5 years, OS and DFS were improved in the IMRT/XELOX treated patients compared to the 3D-CRT/5-FU/FA group. Long-term observation revealed no clinical indications of therapy-induced secondary tumors or renal toxicity.
PURPOSE: In a retrospective analysis, adjuvant intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) combined with modern chemotherapy improved advanced gastric cancer survival rates compared to a combination of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) and conventional chemotherapy. We report on the long-term outcomes of two consecutive patient cohorts that were treated with either IMRT and intensive chemotherapy, or 3D-CRT and conventional chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2001 and 2008, 65 consecutive gastric cancerpatients received either 3D-CRT (n = 27) or IMRT (n = 38) following tumor resection. Chemotherapy comprised predominantly 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (5-FU/FA) in the earlier cohort and capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) in the latter. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: Median OS times were 18 and 43 months in the 3D-CRT and IMRT groups, respectively (p = 0.0602). Actuarial 5-year OS rates were 26 and 47 %, respectively. Within the IMRT group, XELOX gave better results than 5-FU/FA in terms of OS, but this difference was not statistically significant. The primary cause of death in both groups was distant metastasis. Median DFS times were 14 and 35 months in the 3D-CRT and IMRT groups, respectively (p = 0.0693). Actuarial 5-year DFS rates were 22 and 44 %, respectively. Among patients receiving 5-FU/FA, DFS tended to be better in the IMRT group, but this was not statistically significant. A similar analysis for the XELOX group was not possible as 3D-CRT was almost never used to treat these patients. No late toxicity exceeding grade 3 or secondary tumors were observed. CONCLUSION: After a median follow-up period of over 5 years, OS and DFS were improved in the IMRT/XELOX treated patients compared to the 3D-CRT/5-FU/FA group. Long-term observation revealed no clinical indications of therapy-induced secondary tumors or renal toxicity.
Authors: Bernhard J Leibl; Stephanie Vitz; Wolfgang Schäfer; Martin Alfrink; Andreas Gschwendtner; Gerhard G Grabenbauer Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2011-03-24 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Stephen R Smalley; Leonard Gunderson; Joel Tepper; James A Martenson; Bruce Minsky; Christopher Willett; Tyvin Rich Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2002-02-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: S Haneder; H J Michaely; S O Schoenberg; S Konstandin; L R Schad; K Siebenlist; H Wertz; F Wenz; F Lohr; J Boda-Heggemann Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2012-11-01 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Daniel Buergy; Frank Lohr; Tobias Baack; Kerstin Siebenlist; Stefan Haneder; Henrik Michaely; Frederik Wenz; Judit Boda-Heggemann Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2012-11-16 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Stefan Münch; Sylvia Aichmeier; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Marciana-Nona Duma; Markus Oechsner; Marcus Feith; Stephanie E Combs; Daniel Habermehl Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2016-07-14 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Stefan Haneder; Johannes Michael Budjan; Stefan Oswald Schoenberg; Simon Konstandin; Lothar Rudi Schad; Ralf Dieter Hofheinz; Veronika Gramlich; Frederik Wenz; Frank Lohr; Judit Boda-Heggemann Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2014-12-02 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: K Fakhrian; A D Ordu; B Haller; J Theisen; F Lordick; V Bišof; M Molls; H Geinitz Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2014-04-16 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Abdul Wahab M Sharfo; Florian Stieler; Oskar Kupfer; Ben J M Heijmen; Maarten L P Dirkx; Sebastiaan Breedveld; Frederik Wenz; Frank Lohr; Judit Boda-Heggemann; Daniel Buergy Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2018-04-23 Impact factor: 3.481