Literature DB >> 23558663

Reproducibility of radiographic assessment of femoral implant position after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a pilot study.

Régis Pailhé1, Nicolas Reina, David Ancelin, Etienne Cavaignac, Laurent Maubisson, Akash Sharma, Philippe Chiron.   

Abstract

To determine whether femoral implant position can be reproducibly measured on plain digital radiographs, we prospectively studied 40 patients after hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Three observers performed double blinded randomized analysis of calibrated digital radiographs meeting strict quality criteria. The implant stem-shaft angle and femoral anteversion angle were measured by the trapezoid method of axis determination using OsiriX software. The upper and lower offset and the anterior and posterior offset were measured. The statistical analysis was performed using Pearson correlation tests (intra-observer reproducibility) and Fisher F tests (inter-observer reproducibility). Intra-observer reproducibility was very good for all parameters and all observers. Inter-observer reproducibility was excellent except for superior offset measurement. Thus, this study validates a radiographic method for assessing the femoral implant position in hip resurfacing. We believe this could be useful for future studies on hip resurfacing devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23558663     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-013-1218-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  28 in total

1.  Orientation of the femoral component in surface arthroplasty of the hip. A biomechanical and clinical analysis.

Authors:  Paul E Beaulé; Jessica L Lee; Michel J Le Duff; Harlan C Amstutz; Edward Ebramzadeh
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Tilt and rotation correction of acetabular version on pelvic radiographs.

Authors:  M Tannast; G Zheng; C Anderegg; K Burckhardt; F Langlotz; R Ganz; K A Siebenrock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Biomechanical reconstruction of the hip: a randomised study comparing total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J Girard; M Lavigne; P-A Vendittoli; A G Roy
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-06

4.  Radiographic evaluation of the hip has limited reliability.

Authors:  John C Clohisy; John C Carlisle; Robert Trousdale; Young-Jo Kim; Paul E Beaule; Patrick Morgan; Karen Steger-May; Perry L Schoenecker; Michael Millis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Revision of metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: the influence of malpositioning of the components.

Authors:  R De Haan; P A Campbell; E P Su; K A De Smet
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-09

6.  Mini-incision resurfacing arthroplasty of hip through the posterior approach.

Authors:  Derek J W McMinn; Joseph Daniel; Paul B Pynsent; Chandra Pradhan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Surgery for femoroacetabular impingement using a minimally invasive anterolateral approach: analysis of 118 cases at 2.2-year follow-up.

Authors:  P Chiron; A Espié; N Reina; E Cavaignac; F Molinier; J-M Laffosse
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 2.256

8.  Hip resurfacing data from national joint registries: what do they tell us? What do they not tell us?

Authors:  Kristoff Corten; Steven J MacDonald
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Risk of periprosthetic femoral neck fracture after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: valgus compared with anatomic alignment. A biomechanical and clinical analysis.

Authors:  Corey J Richards; Demetri Giannitsios; Olga L Huk; David J Zukor; Thomas Steffen; John Antoniou
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 10.  Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Andrew Shimmin; Paul E Beaulé; Pat Campbell
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.284

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.