John M Ringman1, Giovanni Coppola. 1. Easton Center for Alzheimer’s Disease Research at UCLA, 10911 Weyburn Ave, #200, Los Angeles, CA 90095-7226, USA. jringman@mednet.ucla.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article discusses the current status of knowledge regarding the genetic basis of Alzheimer disease (AD) with a focus on clinically relevant aspects. RECENT FINDINGS: The genetic architecture of AD is complex, as it includes multiple susceptibility genes and likely nongenetic factors. Rare but highly penetrant autosomal dominant mutations explain a small minority of the cases but have allowed tremendous advances in understanding disease pathogenesis. The identification of a strong genetic risk factor, APOE, reshaped the field and introduced the notion of genetic risk for AD. More recently, large-scale genome-wide association studies are adding to the picture a number of common variants with very small effect sizes. Large-scale resequencing studies are expected to identify additional risk factors, including rare susceptibility variants and structural variation. SUMMARY: Genetic assessment is currently of limited utility in clinical practice because of the low frequency (Mendelian mutations) or small effect size (common risk factors) of the currently known susceptibility genes. However, genetic studies are identifying with confidence a number of novel risk genes, and this will further our understanding of disease biology and possibly the identification of therapeutic targets.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article discusses the current status of knowledge regarding the genetic basis of Alzheimer disease (AD) with a focus on clinically relevant aspects. RECENT FINDINGS: The genetic architecture of AD is complex, as it includes multiple susceptibility genes and likely nongenetic factors. Rare but highly penetrant autosomal dominant mutations explain a small minority of the cases but have allowed tremendous advances in understanding disease pathogenesis. The identification of a strong genetic risk factor, APOE, reshaped the field and introduced the notion of genetic risk for AD. More recently, large-scale genome-wide association studies are adding to the picture a number of common variants with very small effect sizes. Large-scale resequencing studies are expected to identify additional risk factors, including rare susceptibility variants and structural variation. SUMMARY: Genetic assessment is currently of limited utility in clinical practice because of the low frequency (Mendelian mutations) or small effect size (common risk factors) of the currently known susceptibility genes. However, genetic studies are identifying with confidence a number of novel risk genes, and this will further our understanding of disease biology and possibly the identification of therapeutic targets.
Authors: Jill Murrell; Bernardino Ghetti; Elizabeth Cochran; Miguel Angel Macias-Islas; Luis Medina; Arousiak Varpetian; Jeffrey L Cummings; Mario F Mendez; Claudia Kawas; Helena Chui; John M Ringman Journal: Neurogenetics Date: 2006-08-05 Impact factor: 2.660
Authors: Hans Basun; Nenad Bogdanovic; Martin Ingelsson; Ove Almkvist; Jan Näslund; Karin Axelman; Thomas D Bird; David Nochlin; Gerard D Schellenberg; Lars-Olof Wahlund; Lars Lannfelt Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2008-04
Authors: Robert C Green; J Scott Roberts; L Adrienne Cupples; Norman R Relkin; Peter J Whitehouse; Tamsen Brown; Susan LaRusse Eckert; Melissa Butson; A Dessa Sadovnick; Kimberly A Quaid; Clara Chen; Robert Cook-Deegan; Lindsay A Farrer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-07-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Suzanne E Wahrle; Hong Jiang; Maia Parsadanian; Jungsu Kim; Aimin Li; Amanda Knoten; Sanjay Jain; Veronica Hirsch-Reinshagen; Cheryl L Wellington; Kelly R Bales; Steven M Paul; David M Holtzman Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: J M Ringman; S G Younkin; D Pratico; W Seltzer; G M Cole; D H Geschwind; Y Rodriguez-Agudelo; B Schaffer; J Fein; S Sokolow; E R Rosario; K H Gylys; A Varpetian; L D Medina; J L Cummings Journal: Neurology Date: 2008-05-28 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Margaret Gatz; Chandra A Reynolds; Laura Fratiglioni; Boo Johansson; James A Mortimer; Stig Berg; Amy Fiske; Nancy L Pedersen Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2006-02
Authors: Clive Holmes; Delphine Boche; David Wilkinson; Ghasem Yadegarfar; Vivienne Hopkins; Anthony Bayer; Roy W Jones; Roger Bullock; Seth Love; James W Neal; Elina Zotova; James A R Nicoll Journal: Lancet Date: 2008-07-19 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Maria Kovalska; Eva Baranovicova; Dagmar Kalenska; Anna Tomascova; Marian Adamkov; Libusa Kovalska; Jan Lehotsky Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-05-07 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: John M Ringman; Alison Goate; Colin L Masters; Nigel J Cairns; Adrian Danek; Neill Graff-Radford; Bernardino Ghetti; John C Morris Journal: Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 5.081