Literature DB >> 23558184

Effect of shear rate on the response of microbial fuel cell toxicity sensor to Cu(II).

Yujia Shen1, Meng Wang, In Seop Chang, How Yong Ng.   

Abstract

A microbial fuel cell (MFC) was successfully developed as a toxicity biomonitoring system, giving a quick response to Cu(II) toxic events. The objective was to increase MFC sensitivity to Cu(II) toxicity by evaluating the impact of shear rate caused by mixing and intermittent nitrogen sparging on the biofilm structure. Low shear rate - achieved by continuously feeding the wastewater into the MFC at a low flow rate of 1.3 mL min(-1) during the enrichment period - resulted in low biomass density (124 g VSS L(-1) of biofilm), high porosity and reduced levels of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS). Consequently, the sensitivity was improved. Scattered nitrogen sparging also increased the sensitivity by reducing the EPS level. It suggested that MFC enriched under low flow rate with intermittent nitrogen sparging could produce an anodic biofilm that was less dense, more porous, contained less EPS and ultimately displayed higher sensitivity to Cu(II) toxicity.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23558184     DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.02.069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioresour Technol        ISSN: 0960-8524            Impact factor:   9.642


  16 in total

1.  Effect of flow rate on growth and oxygen consumption of biofilm in gravity sewer.

Authors:  Jingwei Xu; Muzhi Li; Qiang He; Xingfu Sun; Xiangren Zhou; Zhenping Su; Hainan Ai
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Online monitoring of heavy metal-related toxicity using flow-through and floating microbial fuel cell biosensors.

Authors:  Ademola Adekunle; Carrie Rickwood; Boris Tartakovsky
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Toxicity assessment of copper by electrochemically active bacteria in wastewater.

Authors:  Lijuan Zhang; Sam Fong Yau Li; Huchun Tao
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 4.609

4.  A Terrestrial Single Chamber Microbial Fuel Cell-based Biosensor for Biochemical Oxygen Demand of Synthetic Rice Washed Wastewater.

Authors:  Washington Logroño; Alex Guambo; Mario Pérez; Abudukeremu Kadier; Celso Recalde
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 5.  Water Quality Monitoring in Developing Countries; Can Microbial Fuel Cells be the Answer?

Authors:  Jon Chouler; Mirella Di Lorenzo
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-07-16

6.  External Resistances Applied to MFC Affect Core Microbiome and Swine Manure Treatment Efficiencies.

Authors:  Anna Vilajeliu-Pons; Lluis Bañeras; Sebastià Puig; Daniele Molognoni; Albert Vilà-Rovira; Elena Hernández-Del Amo; Maria D Balaguer; Jesús Colprim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Microbial Fuels Cell-Based Biosensor for Toxicity Detection: A Review.

Authors:  Tuoyu Zhou; Huawen Han; Pu Liu; Jian Xiong; Fake Tian; Xiangkai Li
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Continuous shear stress alters metabolism, mass-transport, and growth in electroactive biofilms independent of surface substrate transport.

Authors:  A-Andrew D Jones; Cullen R Buie
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Microbial Fuel Cell-Based Biosensors.

Authors:  Yang Cui; Bin Lai; Xinhua Tang
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-23

10.  Enhancing Signal Output and Avoiding BOD/Toxicity Combined Shock Interference by Operating a Microbial Fuel Cell Sensor with an Optimized Background Concentration of Organic Matter.

Authors:  Yong Jiang; Peng Liang; Panpan Liu; Yanhong Bian; Bo Miao; Xueliang Sun; Helan Zhang; Xia Huang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.