Javier A Osorio 1 , Giampietro L Vairo , Gerard D Rozea , Philip J Bosha , Roberta L Millard , Douglas F Aukerman , Wayne J Sebastianelli . Show Affiliations »
Abstract
Show RCT »
Hide RCT «
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of taping techniques on clinical measures in patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) patients . DESIGN: Crossover experimental design. SETTING: Controlled laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty physically active PFPS patients . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Isokinetic strength and endurance, and perceived pain . RESULTS: Bilateral baseline differences existed for strength (involved = 1.8 ± 0.5 Nm/kg; uninvolved = 2.1 ± 0.5 Nm/kg; p = 0.001) and endurance (involved = 35.6 ± 14.0 J/kg; uninvolved = 40.2 ± 12.9 J/kg; p = 0.013). Strength (McConnell = 2.1 ± 0.6 Nm/kg, 95% SCI = (1.1, 4.2); Spider(®) = 2.1 ± 0.5 Nm/kg, 95% SCI = (0.9, 4.0)) and endurance (McConnell = 42.9 ± 13.8 J/kg, 95% SCI = (2.9, 11.6); Spider(®) = 42.5 ± 11.0 J/kg, 95% SCI = (2.6, -11.3)) increased when taped compared to baseline. Pain decreased during strength (baseline = 3.0 ± 2.2 cm; McConnell = 1.9 ± 1.7 cm, 95% SCI = (-1.8, -0.4); Spider(®) = 1.6 ± 2.0 cm, 95% SCI = (-2.0, -0.5)) and endurance (baseline = 2.5 ± 2.0 cm; McConnell = 1.5 ± 1.8 cm, 95% SCI = (-1.6, -0.4); Spider(®) = 1.1 ± 0.8 cm, 95% SCI = (-1.7, -0.5)) measurements when taped. Differences between taping techniques were insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: Taping improved clinical measures in PFPS patients . No differences existed between Spider(®) and McConnell techniques.
RCT Entities: Population
Interventions
Outcomes
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of taping techniques on clinical measures in patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) patients . DESIGN: Crossover experimental design. SETTING: Controlled laboratory. PARTICIPANTS : Twenty physically active PFPS patients . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Isokinetic strength and endurance, and perceived pain . RESULTS: Bilateral baseline differences existed for strength (involved = 1.8 ± 0.5 Nm/kg; uninvolved = 2.1 ± 0.5 Nm/kg; p = 0.001) and endurance (involved = 35.6 ± 14.0 J/kg; uninvolved = 40.2 ± 12.9 J/kg; p = 0.013). Strength (McConnell = 2.1 ± 0.6 Nm/kg, 95% SCI = (1.1, 4.2); Spider(®) = 2.1 ± 0.5 Nm/kg, 95% SCI = (0.9, 4.0)) and endurance (McConnell = 42.9 ± 13.8 J/kg, 95% SCI = (2.9, 11.6); Spider(®) = 42.5 ± 11.0 J/kg, 95% SCI = (2.6, -11.3)) increased when taped compared to baseline. Pain decreased during strength (baseline = 3.0 ± 2.2 cm; McConnell = 1.9 ± 1.7 cm, 95% SCI = (-1.8, -0.4); Spider(®) = 1.6 ± 2.0 cm, 95% SCI = (-2.0, -0.5)) and endurance (baseline = 2.5 ± 2.0 cm; McConnell = 1.5 ± 1.8 cm, 95% SCI = (-1.6, -0.4); Spider(®) = 1.1 ± 0.8 cm, 95% SCI = (-1.7, -0.5)) measurements when taped. Differences between taping techniques were insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: Taping improved clinical measures in PFPS patients . No differences existed between Spider(®) and McConnell techniques.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Entities: Disease
Species
Keywords:
Kinesiology tape; McConnell tape; Patellofemoral pain syndrome; Performance
Mesh: See more »
Year: 2013
PMID: 23557728 DOI: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2012.09.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Phys Ther Sport ISSN: 1466-853X Impact factor: 2.365