Literature DB >> 23557447

Risk factors for a prolonged operative time in a single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Norihiro Sato1, Kei Yabuki, Kazunori Shibao, Yasuhisa Mori, Toshihisa Tamura, Aiichiro Higure, Koji Yamaguchi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A prolonged operative time is associated with adverse post-operative outcomes in laparoscopic surgery. Although a single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) requires a longer operative time as compared with a conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy, risk factors for a prolonged operative time in SILC remain unknown.
METHODS: A total of 20 clinical variables were retrospectively reviewed to identify factors for a prolonged operative time (longer than 3 h) in a total of 220 consecutive patients undergoing SILC.
RESULTS: The median operative time was 145 min (range, 55-435) and a prolonged operative time was required in 62 patients (28%). Independent factors that predict a prolonged operative time as identified through multivariate analysis were body mass index (BMI) (P = 0.009), acute cholecystitis (P < 0.001) and operator (resident or staff surgeon) (P < 0.001). Furthermore, a prolonged operative time was significantly associated with an increased amount of intra-operative blood loss (P < 0.001) and a prolonged stay after surgery (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that a higher BMI, acute cholecystitis and a resident as an operator significantly increase the duration of SILC procedures.
© 2013 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23557447      PMCID: PMC3921014          DOI: 10.1111/hpb.12100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  25 in total

1.  Transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy utilizes no incisions outside the umbilicus.

Authors:  G Piskun; S Rajpal
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.878

2.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: what does affect the outcome? A retrospective multifactorial regression analysis.

Authors:  S Lyass; Y Perry; M Venturero; M Muggia-Sullam; A Eid; A Durst; P Reissman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Evangelos C Tsimoyiannis; Konstantinos E Tsimogiannis; George Pappas-Gogos; Charalampos Farantos; Nikolaos Benetatos; Paraskevi Mavridou; Adamantia Manataki
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: report of preliminary data.

Authors:  Jeffrey Marks; Roberto Tacchino; Kurt Roberts; Raymond Onders; George Denoto; Paraskevas Paraskeva; Homero Rivas; Nathaniel Soper; Alexander Rosemurgy; Sajani Shah
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  G Navarra; E Pozza; S Occhionorelli; P Carcoforo; I Donini
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 6.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  S Trastulli; R Cirocchi; J Desiderio; S Guarino; A Santoro; A Parisi; G Noya; C Boselli
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 7.  An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  S M Strasberg; M Hertl; N J Soper
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Long operation and the risk of complications from laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  S P Dexter; I G Martin; J Marton; M J McMahon
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Diagnostic criteria and severity assessment of acute cholecystitis: Tokyo Guidelines.

Authors:  Masahiko Hirota; Tadahiro Takada; Yoshifumi Kawarada; Yuji Nimura; Fumihiko Miura; Koichi Hirata; Toshihiko Mayumi; Masahiro Yoshida; Steven Strasberg; Henry Pitt; Thomas R Gadacz; Eduardo de Santibanes; Dirk J Gouma; Joseph S Solomkin; Jacques Belghiti; Horst Neuhaus; Markus W Büchler; Sheung-Tat Fan; Chen-Guo Ker; Robert T Padbury; Kui-Hin Liau; Serafin C Hilvano; Giulio Belli; John A Windsor; Christos Dervenis
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2007-01-30

10.  Laparoendoscopic single site cholecystectomy: the first 100 patients.

Authors:  Jonathan M Hernandez; Connor A Morton; Sharona Ross; Michael Albrink; Alexander S Rosemurgy
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 0.688

View more
  3 in total

1.  Risk factors for conversion to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Sung Gon Kim; Ju Ik Moon; In Seok Choi; Sang Eok Lee; Nak Song Sung; Ki Won Chun; Hye Yoon Lee; Dae Sung Yoon; Won Jun Choi
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 1.859

2.  Positioning Performance of Power and Manual Drivers in Posterior Spinal Fusion Procedures.

Authors:  J Micah Prendergast; Alexander C Perry; Vikas V Patel; Emily M Lindley; Mark E Rentschler
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 1.781

3.  Risk factors for prolonged operative time in single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Seong Uk Cheon; Ju Ik Moon; In Seok Choi
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 1.859

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.