Literature DB >> 23556991

Amblyopia risk factor prevalence.

Robert W Arnold1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In 2003, the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) published a set of risk factors for amblyopia. The intent was to promote uniformity of reporting and development in screening. Because this prevalence is not yet known, this meta-analysis is an attempt to estimate it.
METHODS: Major community preschool eye examination studies were reviewed and AAPOS cut-offs estimated.
RESULTS: The approximate prevalence of anisometropia is 1.2%, hyperopia is 6%, astigmatism is 15%, myopia is 0.6%, strabismus is 2.5%, and visual acuity less than 20/40 is 6%. The mean combined prevalence is 21% ± 2% compared to a prevalence of amblyopia 20/40 and worse of 2.5%.
CONCLUSIONS: Knowing risk factor prevalence simplifies validation efforts. Amblyopia screening with a risk factor sensitivity less than 100% is expected and desirable. Copyright 2013, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23556991     DOI: 10.3928/01913913-20130326-01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus        ISSN: 0191-3913            Impact factor:   1.402


  16 in total

1.  Biometry: a tool for the detection of amblyopia risk factor in children.

Authors:  Tsukasa Satou; Takahiro Niida; Misae Ito
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  One Year of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus Research in Review.

Authors:  Iris S Kassem; Marilyn T Miller; Steven M Archer
Journal:  Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec

3.  Performance of the Spot Vision Screener in Children Younger Than 3 Years of Age.

Authors:  Blake D Forcina; M Millicent Peterseim; M Edward Wilson; Edward W Cheeseman; Samuel Feldman; Amanda L Marzolf; Bethany J Wolf; Rupal H Trivedi
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  The effectiveness of the Spot Vision Screener in detecting amblyopia risk factors.

Authors:  Mae Millicent W Peterseim; Carrie E Papa; M Edward Wilson; Jennifer D Davidson; Maria Shtessel; Mavesh Husain; Edward W Cheeseman; Bethany J Wolf; Rupal Trivedi
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.220

5.  A new visual acuity test on touchpad for vision screening in children.

Authors:  Elsa Di Foggia; Noémie Stoll; Hélène Meunier; Adam Rimelé; Pascal Ance; Pierre-Henri Moreau; Claude Speeg-Schatz; Arnaud Sauer
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  Photoscreeners in the pediatric eye office: compared testability and refractions on high-risk children.

Authors:  Mae Millicent W Peterseim; Carrie E Papa; M Edward Wilson; Edward W Cheeseman; Bethany J Wolf; Jennifer D Davidson; Rupal H Trivedi
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  School bus accommodation-relaxing skiascopy.

Authors:  Andrew W Arnold; Stephanie L Arnold; Jacob H Sprano; Robert W Arnold
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-08

8.  Canon CP-TX1 camera - As a screening tool for amblyogenic risk factors.

Authors:  Syed Aisha Raza; Abadan Khan Amitava; Yogesh Gupta; Kamran Afzal; Farnaz Kauser; Juhi Saxena; Anam Masood; Aparna Bose; Ramprakash Singh
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 2.969

9.  Evidence for the need for vision screening of school children in Turkey.

Authors:  Serap Azizoğlu; Sheila G Crewther; Funda Şerefhan; Ayla Barutchu; Sinan Göker; Barbara M Junghans
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 2.209

10.  Performance of Two Photoscreeners Enhanced by Protective Cases.

Authors:  Samuel Joseph Martin; Hser Eh Htoo; Nay Hser; Robert W Arnold
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-05-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.