PURPOSE: Lung lesions vary considerably in size, density, and shape, and can attach to surrounding anatomic structures such as chest wall or mediastinum. Automatic segmentation of the lesions poses a challenge. This work communicates a new three-dimensional algorithm for the segmentation of a wide variety of lesions, ranging from tumors found in patients with advanced lung cancer to small nodules detected in lung cancer screening programs. METHODS: The authors' algorithm uniquely combines the image processing techniques of marker-controlled watershed, geometric active contours as well as Markov random field (MRF). The user of the algorithm manually selects a region of interest encompassing the lesion on a single slice and then the watershed method generates an initial surface of the lesion in three dimensions, which is refined by the active geometric contours. MRF improves the segmentation of ground glass opacity portions of part-solid lesions. The algorithm was tested on an anthropomorphic thorax phantom dataset and two publicly accessible clinical lung datasets. These clinical studies included a same-day repeat CT (prewalk and postwalk scans were performed within 15 min) dataset containing 32 lung lesions with one radiologist's delineated contours, and the first release of the Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC) dataset containing 23 lung nodules with 6 radiologists' delineated contours. The phantom dataset contained 22 phantom nodules of known volumes that were inserted in a phantom thorax. RESULTS: For the prewalk scans of the same-day repeat CT dataset and the LIDC dataset, the mean overlap ratios of lesion volumes generated by the computer algorithm and the radiologist(s) were 69% and 65%, respectively. For the two repeat CT scans, the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.998, indicating high reliability of the algorithm. The mean relative difference was -3% for the phantom dataset. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of this new segmentation algorithm in delineating tumor contour and measuring tumor size illustrates its potential clinical value for assisting in noninvasive diagnosis of pulmonary nodules, therapy response assessment, and radiation treatment planning.
PURPOSE:Lung lesions vary considerably in size, density, and shape, and can attach to surrounding anatomic structures such as chest wall or mediastinum. Automatic segmentation of the lesions poses a challenge. This work communicates a new three-dimensional algorithm for the segmentation of a wide variety of lesions, ranging from tumors found in patients with advanced lung cancer to small nodules detected in lung cancer screening programs. METHODS: The authors' algorithm uniquely combines the image processing techniques of marker-controlled watershed, geometric active contours as well as Markov random field (MRF). The user of the algorithm manually selects a region of interest encompassing the lesion on a single slice and then the watershed method generates an initial surface of the lesion in three dimensions, which is refined by the active geometric contours. MRF improves the segmentation of ground glass opacity portions of part-solid lesions. The algorithm was tested on an anthropomorphic thorax phantom dataset and two publicly accessible clinical lung datasets. These clinical studies included a same-day repeat CT (prewalk and postwalk scans were performed within 15 min) dataset containing 32 lung lesions with one radiologist's delineated contours, and the first release of the Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC) dataset containing 23 lung nodules with 6 radiologists' delineated contours. The phantom dataset contained 22 phantom nodules of known volumes that were inserted in a phantom thorax. RESULTS: For the prewalk scans of the same-day repeat CT dataset and the LIDC dataset, the mean overlap ratios of lesion volumes generated by the computer algorithm and the radiologist(s) were 69% and 65%, respectively. For the two repeat CT scans, the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.998, indicating high reliability of the algorithm. The mean relative difference was -3% for the phantom dataset. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of this new segmentation algorithm in delineating tumor contour and measuring tumor size illustrates its potential clinical value for assisting in noninvasive diagnosis of pulmonary nodules, therapy response assessment, and radiation treatment planning.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Binsheng Zhao; Geoffrey R Oxnard; Chaya S Moskowitz; Mark G Kris; William Pao; Pingzhen Guo; Valerie M Rusch; Marc Ladanyi; Naiyer A Rizvi; Lawrence H Schwartz Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-06-09 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Binsheng Zhao; Leonard P James; Chaya S Moskowitz; Pingzhen Guo; Michelle S Ginsberg; Robert A Lefkowitz; Yilin Qin; Gregory J Riely; Mark G Kris; Lawrence H Schwartz Journal: Radiology Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Marios A Gavrielides; Lisa M Kinnard; Kyle J Myers; Jennifer Peregoy; William F Pritchard; Rongping Zeng; Juan Esparza; John Karanian; Nicholas Petrick Journal: Opt Express Date: 2010-07-05 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Assaf Hoogi; Christopher F Beaulieu; Guilherme M Cunha; Elhamy Heba; Claude B Sirlin; Sandy Napel; Daniel L Rubin Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2017-01-13 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Pablo G Cavalcanti; Shahram Shirani; Jacob Scharcanski; Crystal Fong; Jane Meng; Jane Castelli; David Koff Journal: Quant Imaging Med Surg Date: 2016-02
Authors: Yoganand Balagurunathan; Andrew Beers; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Michael McNitt-Gray; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Bensheng Zhao; Jiangguo Zhu; Hao Yang; Stephen S F Yip; Hugo J W L Aerts; Sandy Napel; Dmitrii Cherezov; Kenny Cha; Heang-Ping Chan; Carlos Flores; Alberto Garcia; Robert Gillies; Dmitry Goldgof Journal: Med Phys Date: 2018-02-19 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Binsheng Zhao; Shing M Lee; Hyun-Ju Lee; Yongqiang Tan; Jing Qi; Thorsten Persigehl; David P Mozley; Lawrence H Schwartz Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-04-29 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Laurent Dercle; Dana E Connors; Ying Tang; Stacey J Adam; Mithat Gönen; Patrick Hilden; Sanja Karovic; Michael Maitland; Chaya S Moskowitz; Gary Kelloff; Binsheng Zhao; Geoffrey R Oxnard; Lawrence H Schwartz Journal: JCO Clin Cancer Inform Date: 2018-12
Authors: Mehdi Alilou; Niha Beig; Mahdi Orooji; Prabhakar Rajiah; Vamsidhar Velcheti; Sagar Rakshit; Niyoti Reddy; Michael Yang; Frank Jacono; Robert C Gilkeson; Philip Linden; Anant Madabhushi Journal: Med Phys Date: 2017-05-23 Impact factor: 4.071