Literature DB >> 23556911

Measurement of changes in linear accelerator photon energy through flatness variation using an ion chamber array.

Song Gao1, Peter A Balter, Mark Rose, William E Simon.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the use of flatness versus percent depth dose (PDD) for determining changes in photon beam energy for a megavoltage linear accelerator.
METHODS: Energy changes were accomplished by adjusting the bending magnet current by up to ± 15% in 5% increments away from the value used clinically. Two metrics for flatness, relative flatness in the central 80% of the field (Flat) and average maximum dose along the diagonals normalized by central axis dose (FDN), were measured using a commercially available planner ionization chamber array. PDD was measured in water at depths of 5 and 10 cm in 3 × 3 cm(2) and 10 × 10 cm(2) fields using a cylindrical chamber.
RESULTS: PDD was more sensitive to changes in energy when the beam energy was increased than when it was decreased. For the 18-MV beam in particular, PDD was not sensitive to energy reductions below the nominal energy. The value of Flat was found to be more sensitive to decreases in energy than to increases, with little sensitivity to energy increases above the nominal energy for 18-MV beams. FDN was the only metric that was found to be sensitive to both increases and reductions of energy for both the 6- and 18-MV beams.
CONCLUSIONS: Flatness based metrics were found to be more sensitive to energy changes than PDD, In particular, FDN was found to be the most sensitive metric to energy changes for photon beams of 6 and 18 MV. The ionization chamber array allows this metric to be conveniently measured as part of routine accelerator quality assurance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23556911     DOI: 10.1118/1.4791641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  12 in total

1.  On beam quality and flatness of radiotherapy megavoltage photon beams.

Authors:  Murshed Hossain; Jeffrey Rhoades
Journal:  Australas Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 1.430

2.  A comparison of methods for monitoring photon beam energy constancy.

Authors:  Song Gao; Peter A Balter; Mark Rose; William E Simon
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Clinical implementation of photon beam flatness measurements to verify beam quality.

Authors:  Simon Goodall; Nicholas Harding; Jake Simpson; Louise Alexander; Steve Morgan
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Quantification of beam steering with an ionization chamber array.

Authors:  Song Gao; Peter A Balter; Benjamin Tran; Mark Rose; William E Simon
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-03-25       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Simulation of a medical linear accelerator for teaching purposes.

Authors:  Rhys Anderson; Michael Lamey; Miller MacPherson; Marco Carlone
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Factor 10 Expedience of Monthly Linac Quality Assurance via an Ion Chamber Array and Automation Scripts.

Authors:  Lawrie B Skinner; Yong Yang; Annie Hsu; Lei Xing; Amy S Yu; Thomas Niedermayr
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec

7.  Dosimetric and mechanical equivalency of Varian TrueBeam linear accelerators.

Authors:  Mohammed Ghazal; Lars Södergren; Mathias Westermark; Julia Söderström; Tobias Pommer
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-10-18       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Automated and robust beam data validation of a preconfigured ring gantry linear accelerator using a 1D tank with synchronized beam delivery and couch motions.

Authors:  Nels C Knutson; Matthew C Schmidt; Francisco J Reynoso; Yao Hao; Thomas R Mazur; Eric Laugeman; Geoffrey Hugo; Sasa Mutic; H Harold Li; Wilfred Ngwa; Bin Cai; Erno Sajo
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Using a 2D detector array for meaningful and efficient linear accelerator beam property validations.

Authors:  Timothy A Ritter; Ian Gallagher; Peter L Roberson
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Equivalency of beam scan data collection using a 1D tank and automated couch movements to traditional 3D tank measurements.

Authors:  Nels C Knutson; Matthew C Schmidt; Matthew D Belley; Ngoc Nguyen; Michael Price; Sasa Mutic; Erno Sajo; H Harold Li
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.