Literature DB >> 23556596

Factors affecting the use of envelope interaural time differences in reverberation.

Jessica J M Monaghan1, Katrin Krumbholz, Bernhard U Seeber.   

Abstract

At high frequencies, interaural time differences (ITDs) are conveyed by the sound envelope. Sensitivity to envelope ITDs depends crucially on the envelope shape. Reverberation degrades the envelope shape, reducing the modulation depth of the envelope and the slope of its flanks. Reverberation also reduces the envelope interaural coherence (i.e., the similarity of the envelopes at two ears). The current study investigates the extent to which these changes affect sensitivity to envelope ITDs. The first experiment measured ITD discrimination thresholds at low and high frequencies in a simulated room. The stimulus was either a low-frequency narrowband noise or the same noise transposed to a higher frequency. The results suggest that the effect of reverberation on ITD thresholds was multiplicative. Given that the threshold without reverberation was larger for the transposed than for the low-frequency stimulus, this meant that, in absolute terms, the thresholds for the transposed stimulus showed a much greater increase due to reverberation than those for the low-frequency stimulus. Three further experiments indicated that the effect of reverberation on the envelope ITD thresholds was due to the combined effect of the reduction in the envelope modulation depth and slopes, as well as the decrease in the envelope interaural coherence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23556596     DOI: 10.1121/1.4793270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  11 in total

1.  Subthreshold resonance properties contribute to the efficient coding of auditory spatial cues.

Authors:  Michiel W H Remme; Roberta Donato; Jason Mikiel-Hunter; Jimena A Ballestero; Simon Foster; John Rinzel; David McAlpine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The Impact of Synchronized Cochlear Implant Sampling and Stimulation on Free-Field Spatial Hearing Outcomes: Comparing the ciPDA Research Processor to Clinical Processors.

Authors:  Stephen R Dennison; Heath G Jones; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 3.562

3.  Reverberation impairs brainstem temporal representations of voiced vowel sounds: challenging "periodicity-tagged" segregation of competing speech in rooms.

Authors:  Mark Sayles; Arkadiusz Stasiak; Ian M Winter
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-12

4.  Sensitivity to Envelope Interaural Time Differences at High Modulation Rates.

Authors:  Jessica J M Monaghan; Stefan Bleeck; David McAlpine
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  On the localization of high-frequency, sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones in free field.

Authors:  Eric J Macaulay; Brad Rakerd; Thomas J Andrews; William M Hartmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The relationship between acoustic habitat, hearing and tonal vocalizations in the Antillean manatee (Trichechus manatus manatus, Linnaeus, 1758).

Authors:  Mario Rivera Chavarría; Jorge Castro; Arturo Camacho
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.422

7.  Envelope enhancement increases cortical sensitivity to interaural envelope delays with acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Douglas E H Hartley; Amal Isaiah
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Time-Varying Distortions of Binaural Information by Bilateral Hearing Aids: Effects of Nonlinear Frequency Compression.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; Francisco A Rodriguez; Cory D F Portnuff; Matthew J Goupell; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  A method to enhance the use of interaural time differences for cochlear implants in reverberant environments.

Authors:  Jessica J M Monaghan; Bernhard U Seeber
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Effect of inter-aural modulation depth difference on interaural time difference thresholds for speech: An observational study.

Authors:  Arivudainambi Pitchaimuthu; Vibha Kanagokar; Srividya Grama Bhagavan; Jayashree S Bhat
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2020-02-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.