| Literature DB >> 23556428 |
Yi-Biao Zhou1, Song Liang, Geng-Xin Chen, Chris Rea, Shi-Min Han, Zong-Gui He, Yuan-Pei Li, Jian-Guo Wei, Gen-Ming Zhao, Qing-Wu Jiang.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Schistosomiasis transmission is typically focal. Understanding spatial variations of Schistosoma infections and their associated factors is important to help to invent site-specific intervention strategies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23556428 PMCID: PMC3621803 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-297
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Figure 1The study location in the Qiupu River region in Guichi district, Anhui province, People’s Republic of China.
Characteristics of the cohort population examined from 2005 to 2009
| 2005 | 275 | 22.9 | 654 | 55 | 2.38 | 37.4 |
| (16-35) | (33-85) | (6.7-65.0) | ||||
| [36.2-38.6] | ||||||
| 2006 | 277 | 23.1 | 652 | 54 | 2.35 | 38.2 |
| (16-35) | (33-84) | (7.7-64.5) | ||||
| [37.1-39.4] | ||||||
| 2007 | 275 | 22.9 | 649 | 54 | 2.36 | 40.2 |
| (16-35) | (33-83) | (9.7-65.0) | ||||
| [39.0-41.4] | ||||||
| 2008 | 261 | 21.8 | 575 | 48 | 2.20 | 41.2 |
| (12-32) | (25-85) | (7.3-65.0) | ||||
| [39.9-42.4] | ||||||
| 2009 | 268 | 22.3 | 684 | 57 | 2.55 | 38.2 |
| (13-35) | (27-85) | (5.9-65.0) | ||||
| [36.9-39.4] |
The range min-max values in parentheses (), 95% CI in square bracket [].
Figure 2Global spatial autocorrelation analyses for annual prevalence/incidence of infection from 2005 to 2009. Prevalence/Incidence represents that of the cohort population. The first point (2005) in Prevalence/Incidence represents infection prevalence of the cohort, and the remaining points represent infection incidence of the cohort. The points in Household (Moran’s I) represent the Moran’s I values at household level.
Figure 3LISA Moran scatter plot for infection prevalence at the household level: (a) 2005, (b) 2007, (c) 2009.
Proportion of significant clusters or outliers in the observed households at = 0.05 level, 9999 permutations
| High-high | 2.55 (7/275) | 0.73 (2/275) | 0.00 (0/268) | 8.81 | 0.013 |
| High-low | 1.09 (3/275) | 0.36 (1/275) | 0.37 (1/268) | 1.57 | 0.456 |
| Low-low | 19.27 (53/275) | 10.55 (29/275) | 1.49 (4/268) | 45.61 | 0.000 |
| Low-high | 8.36 (23/275) | 7.27 (20/275) | 3.36 (9/268) | 6.30 | 0.043 |
The number of significant clusters (or outliers) and observed households are presented in parentheses.
Figure 4Spatial cluster location of transmission at the household level in 2005 year. Black dots represent the households. Rate Ratio is presented in the parenthesis.