The complex formation between silver(I) and cysteine (H2Cys), penicillamine (H2Pen), and glutathione (H3Glu) in alkaline aqueous solution was examined using extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) and (109)Ag NMR spectroscopic techniques. The complexes formed in 0.1 mol dm(-3) Ag(I) solutions with cysteine and penicillamine were investigated for ligand/Ag(I) (L/Ag) mole ratios increasing from 2.0 to 10.0. For the series of cysteine solutions (pH 10-11) a mean Ag-S bond distance of 2.45 ± 0.02 Å consistently emerged, while for penicillamine (pH 9) the average Ag-S bond distance gradually increased from 2.40 to 2.44 ± 0.02 Å. EXAFS and (109)Ag NMR spectra of a concentrated Ag(I)-cysteine solution (C(Ag(I)) = 0.8 mol dm(-3), L/Ag = 2.2) showed a mean Ag-S bond distance of 2.47 ± 0.02 Å and δ((109)Ag) 1103 ppm, consistent with prevailing, partially oligomeric AgS3 coordinated species, while for penicillamine (C(Ag(I)) = 0.5 mol dm(-3), L/Ag = 2.0) the mean Ag-S bond distance of 2.40 ± 0.02 Å and δ((109)Ag) 922 ppm indicate that mononuclear AgS2 coordinated complexes dominate. For Ag(I)-glutathione solutions (C(Ag(I)) = 0.01 mol dm(-3), pH ∼11), mononuclear AgS2 coordinated species with a mean Ag-S bond distance of 2.36 ± 0.02 Å dominate for L/Ag mole ratios from 2.0 to 10.0. The crystal structure of the silver(I)-cysteine compound (NH4)Ag2(HCys)(Cys)·H2O (1) precipitating at pH ∼10 was solved and showed a layer structure with both AgS3 and AgS3N coordination to the cysteinate ligands. A redetermination of the crystal structure of Ag(HPen)·H2O (2) confirmed the proposed digonal AgS2 coordination environment to bridging thiolate sulfur atoms in polymeric intertwining chains forming a double helix. A survey of Ag-S bond distances for crystalline Ag(I) complexes with S-donor ligands in different AgS2, AgS2(O/N), and AgS3 coordination environments was used, together with a survey of (109)Ag NMR chemical shifts, to assist assignments of the Ag(I) coordination in solution.
The complex formation between silver(I) and n class="Chemical">cysteine (H2Cys), penicillamine (H2Pen), and glutathione (H3Glu) in alkaline aqueous solution was examined using extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) and (109)Ag NMR spectroscopic techniques. The complexes formed in 0.1 mol dm(-3) Ag(I) solutions with cysteine and penicillamine were investigated for ligand/Ag(I) (L/Ag) mole ratios increasing from 2.0 to 10.0. For the series of cysteine solutions (pH 10-11) a mean Ag-S bond distance of 2.45 ± 0.02 Å consistently emerged, while for penicillamine (pH 9) the average Ag-S bond distance gradually increased from 2.40 to 2.44 ± 0.02 Å. EXAFS and (109)Ag NMR spectra of a concentrated Ag(I)-cysteine solution (C(Ag(I)) = 0.8 mol dm(-3), L/Ag = 2.2) showed a mean Ag-S bond distance of 2.47 ± 0.02 Å and δ((109)Ag) 1103 ppm, consistent with prevailing, partially oligomeric AgS3 coordinated species, while for penicillamine (C(Ag(I)) = 0.5 mol dm(-3), L/Ag = 2.0) the mean Ag-S bond distance of 2.40 ± 0.02 Å and δ((109)Ag) 922 ppm indicate that mononuclear AgS2 coordinated complexes dominate. For Ag(I)-glutathione solutions (C(Ag(I)) = 0.01 mol dm(-3), pH ∼11), mononuclear AgS2 coordinated species with a mean Ag-S bond distance of 2.36 ± 0.02 Å dominate for L/Ag mole ratios from 2.0 to 10.0. The crystal structure of the silver(I)-cysteine compound (NH4)Ag2(HCys)(Cys)·H2O (1) precipitating at pH ∼10 was solved and showed a layer structure with both AgS3 and AgS3N coordination to the cysteinate ligands. A redetermination of the crystal structure of Ag(HPen)·H2O (2) confirmed the proposed digonal AgS2 coordination environment to bridging thiolatesulfur atoms in polymeric intertwining chains forming a double helix. A survey of Ag-S bond distances for crystalline Ag(I) complexes with S-donor ligands in different AgS2, AgS2(O/N), and AgS3 coordination environments was used, together with a survey of (109)Ag NMR chemical shifts, to assist assignments of the Ag(I) coordination in solution.
Authors: Paulo Perez-Lourido; Jose A. Garcia-Vazquez; Jaime Romero; Antonio Sousa; Eric Block; Kevin P. Maresca; Jon Zubieta Journal: Inorg Chem Date: 1999-02-08 Impact factor: 5.165
Authors: Joseph J Castellano; Susan M Shafii; Francis Ko; Guillermo Donate; Terry E Wright; Rudolph J Mannari; Wyatt G Payne; David J Smith; Martin C Robson Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 3.315
Authors: Jessica C Hsu; Yu Du; Arjun Sengupta; Yuxi C Dong; Katherine J Mossburg; Mathilde Bouché; Andrew D A Maidment; Aalim M Weljie; David P Cormode Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces Date: 2021-11-30 Impact factor: 9.229
Authors: Osama El-Zubir; Pablo Rojas Martinez; Gema Dura; Lamia L G Al-Mahamad; Thomas Pope; Thomas J Penfold; Lewis E Mackenzie; Robert Pal; Jackie Mosely; Fabio Cucinotta; Liam F McGarry; Benjamin R Horrocks; Andrew Houlton Journal: J Mater Chem C Mater Date: 2022-04-20 Impact factor: 8.067
Authors: Nur Koncuy Ozdemir; Joseph P Cline; John Sakizadeh; Shannon M Collins; Angela C Brown; Steven McIntosh; Christopher J Kiely; Mark A Snyder Journal: J Mater Chem B Date: 2022-06-22 Impact factor: 7.571
Authors: Luís André Mendes; Vera L Maria; Janeck J Scott-Fordsmand; Mónica J B Amorim Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2015-10-09 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Katarzyna Kluska; Giulia Veronesi; Aurélien Deniaud; Bálint Hajdu; Béla Gyurcsik; Wojciech Bal; Artur Krężel Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2022-02-03 Impact factor: 16.823