| Literature DB >> 23555601 |
Alessio Bocedi1, Giampiero De Sanctis, Chiara Ciaccio, Grazia R Tundo, Alessandra Di Masi, Gabriella Fanali, Francesco P Nicoletti, Mauro Fasano, Giulietta Smulevich, Paolo Ascenzi, Massimo Coletta.
Abstract
HumanEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23555601 PMCID: PMC3605432 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058842
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1HSA Structure.
(A) Ribbon representation of HSA-heme-Fe(III) The six subdomains of HSA are coloured as follows: subdomain IA, green; subdomain IB, cyan; subdomain IIA, red; subdomain IIB, orange; subdomain IIIA, blue; and subdomain IIIB, purple. (B) Enlarged view of allosteric FA1 and FA7 heme-Fe(III) sites. Heme-Fe(III) (in red) and WF (in black) are rendered as balls and sticks. Atomic coordinates were taken from PDB entries 1O9X [14] and 2BXD [29]. The structural model was drawn with the UCSF Chimera package.
Figure 2Scheme for the WF equilibrium binding to HSA-heme-Fe(II).
Figure 3Scheme for the CO (and/or WF) binding to the endogenously hexa-coordinated HSA-heme-Fe(II)-L species.
Figure 4Thermodynamics of WF binding to HSA-heme-Fe(II).
(A) Absorption spectral changes accompanying 1.0×10−2 M WF binding to HSA-heme-Fe(II), at pH 7.0 and 25°C. The equilibration time was 1 hr. The arrow indicates the direction of the absorption change. (B) Optical density changes at 414 nm for WF binding to HSA-heme-Fe(II), at pH 7.0 and 25°C. The continuous line was calculated by the non-linear least-squares fitting of data according to eq. (1) with KWF = 2.2(±0.4)×103 M−1. For details, see text.
Figure 5Kinetics of WF binding to HSA-heme-Fe(II) and HSA-heme-Fe(II)-CO.
(A) Kinetic progress curve at 414 nm for WF ( = 2.5×10−3 M) binding to HSA-heme-Fe(II). Continuous line is the non-linear-least-squares fitting of data according to eq. (2), employing three exponentials (i.e., i = 3). (B) Kinetic progress curve at 414 nm for WF ( = 4.0×10−5 M) binding to HSA-heme-Fe(II)-CO. Continuous line is the non-linear-least-squares fitting of data according to eq. (2), employing two exponentials (i.e., i = 2). (C) WF concentration dependence of observed rate constants for WF binding to 6cLS(1) (o), 5cHS(1) (x), and 4cIS (o). Continuous lines are the non-linear least-squares fitting of data according to eqs (3) (o,x) and (4b) (*). Kinetic parameters obtained from the analysis of data are reported in Table 1. (D) WF concentration dependence of the observed rate constants for WF binding to 6cLS(2) (o) and 6cLS(3) (x). Continuous lines are the non-linear least-squares fitting of data according to eq. (3). Kinetic parameters obtained from the analysis of data are reported in Table 1.
Kinetic parameters for CO and WF binding to different species of HSA-heme-Fe(II).
|
|
|
|
| |
| CO binding | ||||
|
| 4.0(±0.5)×106 | – | – | 2.9(±0.4)×10−2 |
|
| – | 27±3.9 | 6.1(±0.8)×105 | 2.6(±0.4)×10−1 |
|
| 5.9(±0.7) ×105 | – | – | 1.2(±0.3)×10−1 |
|
| – | 0.87±0.11 | 4.0(±0.5)×104 | 1.6(±0.3)×10−2 |
| WF binding | ||||
|
| 4.4(±0.6)×102 | – | – | 2.0(±0.4)×10−1 |
|
| 4.7(±0.7)×105 | – | – | 2.4(±0.4)×101 |
|
| 0.049±0.006 | 3.5(±0.5)×103 | 8.9(±1.3)×10−4 | |
|
| 1.2(±0.3)×103 | – | – | 8.9(±1.2)×10−1 |
|
| 1.2(±0.3)×102 | – | – | 1.4(±0.3)×10−1 |
Figure 6Kinetics of CO binding to WF-HSA-heme-Fe(II).
(A) Kinetic progress curve at 414 nm for CO ( = 7.5×10−5 M) binding HSA-heme in the presence of WF ( = 1.0×10−2 M) equilibrated for 1 hr. Continuous line is the non-linear-least-squares fitting of data according to eq. (2), employing three exponentials (i.e., i = 3). Dashed line is the non-linear-least-squares fitting of data according to eq. (2), employing two exponentials (i.e., i = 2). (B) CO concentration dependence of the rate constants for CO binding in the presence of WF ( = 1.0×10−2 M) to WF-5cHS(1) (o) and WF-6cLS(1) (x); values described by “*” refer to the rate of species reequilibration (see text). Continuous lines are the non-linear least-squares fitting of data according to eqs (3) (o) and (4b) (x). Kinetic parameters obtained from the analysis are reported in Table 1. (C) Kinetic progress curve at 414 nm for CO dissociation from HSA-heme-Fe(II)-CO in the presence of WF ( = 1.0×10−2 M). The optical change corresponds to the displacement of CO by a large excess of NO. Continuous line represents the non-linear least-squares fitting of data according to eq. (2) (where kobsCO is substituted by koffCO), employing two exponentials (i.e., i = 2).
Figure 7Spectroscopic properties of HSA-heme-Fe(II)-CO.
Electronic absorption (Top) and RR spectra (bottom) of the CO complexes of HSA-heme-Fe(II)-CO at pH 7 in the presence of warfarin. RR spectra experimental conditions: 413.1 nm excitation; 1 and 3.3 cm−1 spectra resolution for the low and high frequency region, respectively; 3 mW laser power at the sample; average of 6 spectra (low frequency region) and 18 spectra (high frequency region) with 300 s integration time. The intensities are normalized to that of the ν4 band (not shown).
Figure 8Plot of the ν(FeC) versus ν(CO) frequencies of HSA-heme-Fe(II) under various experimental conditions
. Left: Plot of the ν(FeC) versus ν(CO) frequencies observed in the CO complexes of heme-HSA under various experimental conditions (right). The lower line indicates the back-bonding correlation line for six-coordinate CO heme proteins with imidazole as sixth ligand, as given in ref. [49]. The upper line represents five-coordinate, with no trans ligand, or six-coordinate CO heme proteins with weak trans ligands as Tyr [23].
Figure 9Thermodynamic and kinetic scheme correlating CO binding to 4cIS, 5cHS(1) and WF-5cHS(1) with WF binding to 5cHS(1) and 6cLS(2).
Figure 10Thermodynamic and kinetic scheme correlating CO binding to 6cLS(1) and WF-6cLS(1) with WF binding to 6cLS(1) and 6cLS(3).