BACKGROUND: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) has been recognized as an independent risk factor for vascular events and contributes to an adverse prognosis. Long-term administration of clopidogrel is recommended to prevent atherothrombotic events for patients with established PAD. We investigated the benefits of clopidogrel treatment in Japanese patients with PAD. MATERIALS AND METHODS:COOPER (Clopidogrel for atherOthrombOtic event management in patients with PERipheral arterial disease) was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of clopidogrel (75 mg/day) compared to ticlopidine (200 mg/day) in Japanese patients with PAD. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of "safety events of interest" comprising clinically significant bleeding, blood disorders, hepatic dysfunction and other serious adverse events up to 12 weeks. The other safety events and vascular events were also assessed. Patients were followed up to 52 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 431 patients with PAD were randomly assigned to receive either clopidogrel or ticlopidine. The cumulative incidences of "safety events of interest" at 12 weeks were 2.4% and 13.6% of patients who received clopidogrel and ticlopidine, respectively (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.161; 95% confidence interval, 0.062 to 0.416; p <0.0001). Bleeding and vascular events were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION:Clopidogrel demonstrated a favorable benefit/risk profile than ticlopidine in Japanese patients with PAD. ( TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT00862420).
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) has been recognized as an independent risk factor for vascular events and contributes to an adverse prognosis. Long-term administration of clopidogrel is recommended to prevent atherothrombotic events for patients with established PAD. We investigated the benefits of clopidogrel treatment in Japanese patients with PAD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: COOPER (Clopidogrel for atherOthrombOtic event management in patients with PERipheral arterial disease) was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of clopidogrel (75 mg/day) compared to ticlopidine (200 mg/day) in Japanese patients with PAD. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of "safety events of interest" comprising clinically significant bleeding, blood disorders, hepatic dysfunction and other serious adverse events up to 12 weeks. The other safety events and vascular events were also assessed. Patients were followed up to 52 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 431 patients with PAD were randomly assigned to receive either clopidogrel or ticlopidine. The cumulative incidences of "safety events of interest" at 12 weeks were 2.4% and 13.6% of patients who received clopidogrel and ticlopidine, respectively (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.161; 95% confidence interval, 0.062 to 0.416; p <0.0001). Bleeding and vascular events were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION:Clopidogrel demonstrated a favorable benefit/risk profile than ticlopidine in Japanese patients with PAD. ( TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT00862420).
Authors: M H Criqui; R D Langer; A Fronek; H S Feigelson; M R Klauber; T J McCann; D Browner Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1992-02-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Michal Tendera; Victor Aboyans; Marie-Louise Bartelink; Iris Baumgartner; Denis Clément; Jean-Philippe Collet; Alberto Cremonesi; Marco De Carlo; Raimund Erbel; F Gerry R Fowkes; Magda Heras; Serge Kownator; Erich Minar; Jan Ostergren; Don Poldermans; Vincent Riambau; Marco Roffi; Joachim Röther; Horst Sievert; Marc van Sambeek; Thomas Zeller Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2011-08-26 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: C J Foster; D M Prosser; J M Agans; Y Zhai; M D Smith; J E Lachowicz; F L Zhang; E Gustafson; F J Monsma; M T Wiekowski; S J Abbondanzo; D N Cook; M L Bayne; S A Lira; M S Chintala Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Ph Gabriel Steg; Deepak L Bhatt; Peter W F Wilson; Ralph D'Agostino; E Magnus Ohman; Joachim Röther; Chiau-Suong Liau; Alan T Hirsch; Jean-Louis Mas; Yasuo Ikeda; Michael J Pencina; Shinya Goto Journal: JAMA Date: 2007-03-21 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: L Janzon; D Bergqvist; J Boberg; M Boberg; I Eriksson; F Lindgärde; G Persson; B Almgren; B Fagher; T Kjellström Journal: J Intern Med Date: 1990-05 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Elizabeth M Mahoney; Kaijun Wang; Hong H Keo; Sue Duval; Kim G Smolderen; David J Cohen; Gabriel Steg; Deepak L Bhatt; Alan T Hirsch Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2010-10-12
Authors: Curt Diehm; Jens Rainer Allenberg; David Pittrow; Matthias Mahn; Gerhart Tepohl; Roman L Haberl; Harald Darius; Ina Burghaus; Hans Joachim Trampisch Journal: Circulation Date: 2009-11-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Victor L Serebruany; Alex I Malinin; James J Ferguson; Javad Vahabi; Dan Atar; Charles H Hennekens Journal: Fundam Clin Pharmacol Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 2.748
Authors: Colin Baigent; Lisa Blackwell; Rory Collins; Jonathan Emberson; Jon Godwin; Richard Peto; Julie Buring; Charles Hennekens; Patricia Kearney; Tom Meade; Carlo Patrono; Maria Carla Roncaglioni; Alberto Zanchetti Journal: Lancet Date: 2009-05-30 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Margreet R de Vries; Karin H Simons; J Wouter Jukema; Jerry Braun; Paul H A Quax Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2016-05-19 Impact factor: 32.419
Authors: Marco De Carlo; Giovanni Di Minno; Tobias Sayre; Mir Sohail Fazeli; Gaye Siliman; Claudio Cimminiello Journal: Curr Vasc Pharmacol Date: 2021 Impact factor: 2.719
Authors: Loes H Willems; Dominique P M S M Maas; Kees Kramers; Michel M P J Reijnen; Niels P Riksen; Hugo Ten Cate; Rozemarijn J van der Vijver-Coppen; Gert J de Borst; Barend M E Mees; Clark J Zeebregts; Gerjon Hannink; Michiel C Warlé Journal: Drugs Date: 2022-08-23 Impact factor: 11.431