OBJECTIVES: To clarify interface pressures (IP) derived from class II and III oversize stockings. METHODS: Healthy volunteers with legs fitting size S (n = 10), M (n = 6), or L (n = 6) stockings wore class II and III stockings of various sizes up to 5L. IPs were measured in the supine and the standing position with each stocking on. RESULTS: In the subjects with size S legs, the IPs in the standing position while wearing S and M class III stockings were 43.5 ± 4.7 and 40.4 ± 5.4 mmHg respectively. These IPs were significantly higher than the IP while wearing the S size class II stocking (33.3 ± 5.9 mmHg). IPs derived from L, LL, 3L, 4L, 5L class III stockings were not significantly different from IP with the S size class II stocking. The results were similar for the subjects with size M legs while wearing the size M and L class III stockings and for the subjects with size L legs while wearing the size L and LL class III stockings vs. the appropriate size class II stocking. CONCLUSION: Based on these findings, a larger size class III stocking can provide similar or even higher IPs compared to an appropriate size class II stocking.
OBJECTIVES: To clarify interface pressures (IP) derived from class II and III oversize stockings. METHODS: Healthy volunteers with legs fitting size S (n = 10), M (n = 6), or L (n = 6) stockings wore class II and III stockings of various sizes up to 5L. IPs were measured in the supine and the standing position with each stocking on. RESULTS: In the subjects with size S legs, the IPs in the standing position while wearing S and M class III stockings were 43.5 ± 4.7 and 40.4 ± 5.4 mmHg respectively. These IPs were significantly higher than the IP while wearing the S size class II stocking (33.3 ± 5.9 mmHg). IPs derived from L, LL, 3L, 4L, 5L class III stockings were not significantly different from IP with the S size class II stocking. The results were similar for the subjects with size M legs while wearing the size M and L class III stockings and for the subjects with size L legs while wearing the size L and LL class III stockings vs. the appropriate size class II stocking. CONCLUSION: Based on these findings, a larger size class III stocking can provide similar or even higher IPs compared to an appropriate size class II stocking.
Authors: Hugo Partsch; Michael Clark; Sophie Bassez; Jean-Patrick Benigni; Francis Becker; Vladimir Blazek; Joseph Caprini; André Cornu-Thénard; Jürg Hafner; Mieke Flour; Michael Jünger; Christine Moffatt; Martino Neumann Journal: Dermatol Surg Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 3.398
Authors: Bo Eklöf; Robert B Rutherford; John J Bergan; Patrick H Carpentier; Peter Gloviczki; Robert L Kistner; Mark H Meissner; Gregory L Moneta; Kenneth Myers; Frank T Padberg; Michel Perrin; C Vaughan Ruckley; Philip Coleridge Smith; Thomas W Wakefield Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 4.268