| Literature DB >> 23554759 |
Zhe Qiao1, Chengxue Dang, Bin Zhou, Shaomin Li, Wei Zhang, Jiantao Jiang, Jin Zhang, Ranran Kong, Yuefeng Ma.
Abstract
The aim of this present study was to explore the expression and clinical significance of O-linked N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc) transferase (OGT) and enzymatic O-linked glycosylation (O-GlcNAcation) through the addition of O-linked-β-N-acetylglucosamine in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. OGT expression and O-GlcNAcation in 40 samples from patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma was detected by immunohistochemical staining with anti-OGT antib ody and O-GlcNAc-specific antibody RL2, respectively. The relationship between pathological and clinical factors of patients was analyzed. We found that the expression of OGT was higher in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma samples compared to the normal tissues. RL2 antibody level was positively correlated with OGT expression, and the metastasis of lymph node, which means the level of O-GlcNAcation was high and related to the metastasis of lymph node in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. In conclusion, OGT activation is the main reason for promoting the level of O-GlcNAcation in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. O-GlcNAcylation may play an important role in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Entities:
Keywords: O-linked N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc) transferase (OGT); O-linked glycosylation (O-GlcNAcation); esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Year: 2012 PMID: 23554759 PMCID: PMC3596743 DOI: 10.7555/JBR.26.20110121
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomed Res ISSN: 1674-8301
Fig. 1OGT and RL2 expression in normal and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SP staining, ×100).
A: Expression of OGT in normal esophageal mucosa. B: Expression of OGT in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. C: Expression of O-GlcNAc in normal esophageal mucosa. D: Expression of O-GlcNAc in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Relationship between OGT expression and pathologic features of esophageal cancer patients
| Pathological factor | Low expression of OGT | High expression of OGT | |
| Sample source | |||
| Esophageal cancer | 5 | 35 | 0 |
| Normal esophageal mucosa | 30 | 10 | |
| T stage | |||
| T2 | 1 | 20 | 1.0 |
| T3 | 4 | 15 | |
| Length of cancer | |||
| > 5 cm | 2 | 22 | 0.78 |
| < 5 cm | 3 | 13 | |
| Lymph node metastasis | |||
| (+) | 3 | 25 | 0.627 |
| (–) | 2 | 10 | |
| Gender | |||
| Male | 3 | 25 | 0.627 |
| Female | 2 | 10 | |
| Age (years) | |||
| < 50 | 1 | 18 | 0.345 |
| > 50 | 4 | 17 |
(n = 40)
Relationship between RL2 level and pathologic features in esophageal cancer patients
| Pathological factor | Low expression of RL2 | High expression of RL2 | |
| Sample source | |||
| Esophageal cancer | 10 | 30 | 0.02 |
| Normal esophageal mucosa | 25 | 15 | |
| T stage | |||
| T2 | 7 | 14 | 0.181 |
| T3 | 3 | 16 | |
| Length of cancer | |||
| > 5 cm | 4 | 20 | 0.159 |
| < 5 cm | 6 | 10 | |
| Lymph node metastasis | |||
| (+) | 5 | 23 | 0.046 |
| (–) | 6 | 6 | |
| Gender | |||
| Male | 6 | 22 | 0.451 |
| Female | 4 | 8 | |
| Age (years) | |||
| < 50 | 4 | 15 | 0.721 |
| > 50 | 6 | 15 |
(n = 20)