Literature DB >> 23554589

Modeling heading and path perception from optic flow in the case of independently moving objects.

Florian Raudies1, Heiko Neumann.   

Abstract

Humans are usually accurate when estimating heading or path from optic flow, even in the presence of independently moving objects (IMOs) in an otherwise rigid scene. To invoke significant biases in perceived heading, IMOs have to be large and obscure the focus of expansion (FOE) in the image plane, which is the point of approach. For the estimation of path during curvilinear self-motion no significant biases were found in the presence of IMOs. What makes humans robust in their estimation of heading or path using optic flow? We derive analytical models of optic flow for linear and curvilinear self-motion using geometric scene models. Heading biases of a linear least squares method, which builds upon these analytical models, are large, larger than those reported for humans. This motivated us to study segmentation cues that are available from optic flow. We derive models of accretion/deletion, expansion/contraction, acceleration/deceleration, local spatial curvature, and local temporal curvature, to be used as cues to segment an IMO from the background. Integrating these segmentation cues into our method of estimating heading or path now explains human psychophysical data and extends, as well as unifies, previous investigations. Our analysis suggests that various cues available from optic flow help to segment IMOs and, thus, make humans' heading and path perception robust in the presence of such IMOs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D motion models; independently moving object; kinetic contours; optic flow; self-motion

Year:  2013        PMID: 23554589      PMCID: PMC3612589          DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1662-5153            Impact factor:   3.558


  38 in total

1.  Parallax and perspective during aircraft landings.

Authors:  J J GIBSON; P OLUM; F ROSENBLATT
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1955-09

2.  A cortical architecture on parallel hardware for motion processing in real time.

Authors:  Karl Pauwels; Norbert Krüger; Markus Lappe; Florentin Wörgötter; Marc M Van Hulle
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Computing heading in the presence of moving objects: a model that uses motion-opponent operators.

Authors:  Constance S Royden
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Processing differential image motion.

Authors:  J H Rieger; D T Lawton
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  Estimating heading during eye movements.

Authors:  C S Royden; J A Crowell; M S Banks
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Visibility of movement gradients.

Authors:  A J van Doorn; J J Koenderink
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.086

7.  Representation of motion onset and offset in an augmented Barlow-Levick model of motion detection.

Authors:  Timothy Barnes; Ennio Mingolla
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 1.621

8.  Visual guidance of intercepting a moving target on foot.

Authors:  Brett R Fajen; William H Warren
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  A neural model of how the brain computes heading from optic flow in realistic scenes.

Authors:  N Andrew Browning; Stephen Grossberg; Ennio Mingolla
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Active gaze control improves optic flow-based segmentation and steering.

Authors:  Florian Raudies; Ennio Mingolla; Heiko Neumann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  The temporal dynamics of heading perception in the presence of moving objects.

Authors:  Oliver W Layton; Brett R Fajen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Causal inference accounts for heading perception in the presence of object motion.

Authors:  Kalpana Dokka; Hyeshin Park; Michael Jansen; Gregory C DeAngelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Multisensory Integration of Visual and Vestibular Signals Improves Heading Discrimination in the Presence of a Moving Object.

Authors:  Kalpana Dokka; Gregory C DeAngelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Modeling Physiological Sources of Heading Bias from Optic Flow.

Authors:  Sinan Yumurtaci; Oliver W Layton
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2021-11-17

5.  Competitive Dynamics in MSTd: A Mechanism for Robust Heading Perception Based on Optic Flow.

Authors:  Oliver W Layton; Brett R Fajen
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Optic flow parsing in the macaque monkey.

Authors:  Nicole E Peltier; Dora E Angelaki; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.