| Literature DB >> 23554552 |
Alexey A Tinkov1, Olga P Ajsuvakova, Alexandr M Shehtman, Viktor M Boev, Alexandr A Nikonorov.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of iron and copper consumption on weight gain and development of oxidative stress in adipose tissue of rats. Control rats obtained pure drinking water. Iron-treated groups of animals obtained FeSO4•12H2O with drinking water in concentrations of 3 and 6 mg/l, while copper-treated rats obtained CuSO4 in concentrations of 4.88 and 9.76 mg/l. The animals of the 6th group received a mixture of FeSO4•12H2O and CuSO4 in the respective concentrations of 3 and 4.88 mg/l in drinking water. All animals received a standard chow. The final weight of rats from all the experimental groups, especially in those obtaining the combination of iron and cooper, exceeded the control values. Maximal weight of fat pads was observed in animals receiving drinking water with 3 mg/l FeSO4•12H2O, 4.88 and 9.76 mg/l CuSO4, and the mixture of FeSO4•12H2O and CuSO4. The maximal intensity of free radical processes, as estimated by the concentration of fluorescent modified amino acids and the intensity of chemiluminescence in adipose tissue homogenates, was observed in rats obtaining iron in the concentration of 3 mg/l in the drinking water.Entities:
Keywords: metals; oxidative stress; rat; weight gain
Year: 2012 PMID: 23554552 PMCID: PMC3600512 DOI: 10.2478/v10102-012-0021-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Interdiscip Toxicol ISSN: 1337-6853
Intensity of food consumption and weight gain in rats.
| No | Obtained chemical (mg/l) | Initial weight (g) | Food consumption during 1st month (g) | Weight after 1st month (g) | Food consumption during 2nd month (g) | Weight after 2nd month (g) | Food consumption during 3d month (g) | Weight after 3d month (g) | Total weight gain (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Control (–) | 173.0±1.8 | 18.63±0.81 | 237.8±1.8 | 18.33±0.43 | 284.4±1.9 | 19.15±0.55 | 291.6±1.7 | 118.6±2.3 |
| 2 | Fe2+ (3) | 172.5±4.5 | 19.85±1.40 | 236.7±4.9 | 18.89±0.40 | 285.9±6.5 | 19.33±0.78 | 292.0±8.1 | 119.5±4.6 |
| 3 | Fe2+ (6) | 176.8±1.9 | 18.50±1.21 | 239.1±4.0 | 18.91±0.62 | 294.0±7.0 | 19.54±1.46 | 302.6±6.0 | 125.8±6.7 |
| 4 | Cu+ (4.88) | 169.8±2.2 | 22.15±1.38 | 232.5±4.4 | 22.31±0.78 | 287.5±5.8 | 22.81±1.39 | 297.0±5.6 | 127.2±6.1 |
| 5 | Cu2+ (9.76) | 174.2±4.2 | 20.22±0.99 | 243.8±2.1 | 19.54±0.51 | 285.8±3.0 | 19.24±0.91 | 298.7±3.0 | 124.5±4.3 |
| 6 | Fe2+/Cu2+ (3/4.88) | 171.8±3.2 | 20.78±1.11 | 244.9±1.8 | 20.43±0.67 | 296.3±4.8 | 21.29±0.73 | 308.7±4.7 | 136.9±5.7 |
All data represented as Mean ± SEM
p < 0.05 vs control group of animals
Rat morphometric parameters.
| N2 | Obtained chemical (mg/l) | Fat pad weight (g) | Percentage of fat pad weight from body weight (%) | BMI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Control (–) | 4.97±0.13 | 1.70±0.04 | 0.65±0.01 |
| 2 | Fe2+ (3) | 7.50±0.51 | 2.62±0.12 | 0.69±0.02 |
| 3 | Fe2+ (6) | 6.17±0.37 | 2.03±0.15 | 0.70±0.02 |
| 4 | Cu+ (4.88) | 7.43±0.27 | 2.50±0.13 | 0.69±0.01 |
| 5 | Cu2+ (9.76) | 7.22±0.42 | 2.41±0.12 | 0.69±0.01 |
| 6 | Fe2+/Cu2+ (3/4.88) | 7.95±0.67 | 2.57±0.21 | 0.67±0.01 |
All data represented as Mean ± SEM
p<0.05 vs control group of animals
Iron and copper content in hair and adipose tissue of rats.
| No | Obtained chemical (mg/l) | Concentration of metals in hair (µg/g) | Concentration of metals in adipose tissue (µg/g) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Fe | Cu | Fe | Cu | ||
| 1 | Control (–) | 19.31±0.67 | 12.32±0.37 | 6.62±0.81 | 0.27±0.02 |
| 2 | Fe2+ (3) | 21.83±0.63 | 12.93±0.40 | 7.63±0.70 | 0.23±0.03 |
| 3 | Fe2+ (6) | 22.93±1.21 | 13.11±0.54 | 10.24±1.45 | 0.25±0.02 |
| 4 | Cu+ (4.88) | 19.79±0.31 | 13.54±1.01 | 8.28±2.29 | 0.27±0.06 |
| 5 | Cu2+ (9.76) | 18.67±2.11 | 13.77±0.27 | 8.75±0.97 | 0.24±0.02 |
| 6 | Fe2+/Cu2+ (3/4.88) | 21.14±2.40 | 14.25±1.14 | 7.06±0.36 | 0.27±0.02 |
All data represented as Mean ± SEM
p<0.05 vs control group of animals
Markers of oxidative stress in adipose tissue homogenates.
| N2 | Obtained chemical (mg/l) | Dityrosine, RFU | Lys-LPO, RFU | Fast flash amplitude (c. u.) | General luminosity (c. u.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Control (–) | 0.79±0.06 | 0.59±0.04 | 0.66±0.03 | 1.66±0.05 |
| 2 | Fe2+ (3) | 1.00±0.05 | 0.95±0.09 | 1.75±0.27 | 2.17±0.12 |
| 3 | Fe2+ (6) | 0.97±0.09 | 0.67±0.12 | 0.73±0.03 | 1.83±0.09 |
| 4 | Cu+ (4.88) | 0.79±0.07 | 0.87±0.09 | 0.71±0.05 | 1.80±0.14 |
| 5 | Cu2+ (9.76) | 0.79±0.10 | 0.88±0.05 | 0.73±0.07 | 2.07±0.11 |
| 6 | Fe2+/Cu2+ (3/4.88) | 0.94±0.05 | 0.71±0.05 | 0.87±0.15 | 2.07±0.13 |
All data represented as Mean ± SEM
p<0.05 vs control group of animals
Figure 1Histology of rat adipose tissue. Hematoxylin and eosin stains (×200). (a) adipose tissue of control rat. Only single lymphoid cells are present; (b) adipose tissue of rats obtaining FeSO4·12H2O and CuSO4 in respective concentrations of 3 and 4.88 mg/l. Lymphoid infiltration of adipose tissue is observed.