Literature DB >> 2355445

The case for reassessment of health care technology. Once is not enough.

H D Banta1, S B Thacker.   

Abstract

Assessment of health care technologies should be an iterative process, not a single event. In the United States there are an increasing number of organized attempts at reassessment of technologies by the health industry, professional societies, and national government agencies, such as the Medical Necessity Project of Blue Cross/Blue Shield, the Clinical Efficacy Assessment Project of the American College of Physicians, and the work of the US Preventive Services Task Force. We examine four clinical practices--electronic fetal monitoring, episiotomy, electroencephalography, and hysterectomy--to illustrate the need to continuously reassess existing technologies and to challenge our current inertia in this critical arena of health practice.

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2355445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  12 in total

1.  Midline versus mediolateral episiotomy.

Authors:  S B Thacker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-06-17

2.  STA distinguished lecture. Can technology education during medical school make better doctors?

Authors:  R J Kitz
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1992-07

Review 3.  Delayed assessment and eager adoption of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: implications for developing surgical technologies.

Authors:  Alexander C Allori; I Michael Leitman; Elizabeth Heitman
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  A practical guide to value of information analysis.

Authors:  Edward C F Wilson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Use of blood tests in general practice: a collaborative study in eight European countries. Eurosentinel Study Group.

Authors:  P Leurquin; V Van Casteren; J De Maeseneer
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 6.  Basic concepts and fundamental issues in technology assessment.

Authors:  C Franklin
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Assessing prevention effectiveness using data to drive program decisions.

Authors:  S B Thacker; J P Koplan; W R Taylor; A R Hinman; M F Katz; W L Roper
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 8.  Identifying low-value clinical practices in critical care medicine: protocol for a scoping review.

Authors:  Daniel J Niven; T Jared McCormick; Sharon E Straus; Brenda R Hemmelgarn; Lianne P Jeffs; Henry T Stelfox
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 9.  Towards understanding the de-adoption of low-value clinical practices: a scoping review.

Authors:  Daniel J Niven; Kelly J Mrklas; Jessalyn K Holodinsky; Sharon E Straus; Brenda R Hemmelgarn; Lianne P Jeffs; Henry Thomas Stelfox
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 10.  Addressing overuse of health services in health systems: a critical interpretive synthesis.

Authors:  Moriah E Ellen; Michael G Wilson; Marcela Vélez; Ruth Shach; John N Lavis; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Kaelan A Moat
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2018-06-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.