Literature DB >> 23553842

Ligand-induced μ opioid receptor internalization in enteric neurons following chronic treatment with the opiate fentanyl.

Laura Anselmi1, Ingrid Jaramillo, Michelle Palacios, Jennifer Huynh, Catia Sternini.   

Abstract

Morphine differs from most opiates its poor ability to internalize μ opioid receptors (μORs). However, chronic treatment with morphine produces adaptational changes at the dynamin level, which enhance the efficiency of acute morphine stimulation to promote μOR internalization in enteric neurons. This study tested the effect of chronic treatment with fentanyl, a μOR-internalizing agonist, on ligand-induced endocytosis and the expression of the intracellular trafficking proteins, dynamin and β-arrestin, in enteric neurons using organotypic cultures of the guinea pig ileum. In enteric neurons from guinea pigs chronically treated with fentanyl, μOR immunoreactivity was predominantly at the cell surface after acute exposure to morphine with a low level of μOR translocation, slightly higher than in neurons from naïve animals. This internalization was not due to morphine's direct effect, because it was also observed in neurons exposed to medium alone. By contrast, D-Ala2-N-Me-Phe4-Gly-ol5-enkephalin (DAMGO), a potent μOR-internalizing agonist, induced pronounced and rapid μOR endocytosis in enteric neurons from animals chronically treated with fentanyl or from naïve animals. Chronic fentanyl treatment did not alter dynamin or β-arrestin expression. These findings indicate that prolonged activation of μORs with an internalizing agonist such as fentanyl does not enhance the ability of acute morphine to trigger μOR endocytosis or induce changes in intracellular trafficking proteins, as observed with prolonged activation of μORs with a poorly internalizing agonist such as morphine. Cellular adaptations induced by chronic opiate treatment might be ligand dependent and vary with the agonist efficiency to induce receptor internalization.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23553842      PMCID: PMC3631303          DOI: 10.1002/jnr.23214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Res        ISSN: 0360-4012            Impact factor:   4.164


  51 in total

1.  Relative opioid efficacy is determined by the complements of the G protein-coupled receptor desensitization machinery.

Authors:  L M Bohn; L A Dykstra; R J Lefkowitz; M G Caron; L S Barak
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.436

2.  Immunohistochemical localization of mu-opioid receptors in the central nervous system of the rat.

Authors:  Y Q Ding; T Kaneko; S Nomura; N Mizuno
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1996-04-08       Impact factor: 3.215

3.  Loss of morphine-induced analgesia, reward effect and withdrawal symptoms in mice lacking the mu-opioid-receptor gene.

Authors:  H W Matthes; R Maldonado; F Simonin; O Valverde; S Slowe; I Kitchen; K Befort; A Dierich; M Le Meur; P Dollé; E Tzavara; J Hanoune; B P Roques; B L Kieffer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-10-31       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Regulatory mechanisms that modulate signalling by G-protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  S K Böhm; E F Grady; N W Bunnett
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1997-02-15       Impact factor: 3.857

5.  Cellular localization and distribution of the cloned mu and kappa opioid receptors in rat gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  D Bagnol; A Mansour; H Akil; S J Watson
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  The effect of intrinsic efficacy on opioid tolerance.

Authors:  A Duttaroy; B C Yoburn
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Morphine activates opioid receptors without causing their rapid internalization.

Authors:  D E Keith; S R Murray; P A Zaki; P C Chu; D V Lissin; L Kang; C J Evans; M von Zastrow
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1996-08-09       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Dynamin and beta-arrestin reveal distinct mechanisms for G protein-coupled receptor internalization.

Authors:  J Zhang; S S Ferguson; L S Barak; L Ménard; M G Caron
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1996-08-02       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Development of tolerance to the analgesic activity of mu agonists after continuous infusion of morphine, meperidine or fentanyl in rats.

Authors:  C A Paronis; S G Holtzman
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.030

10.  Agonist-selective endocytosis of mu opioid receptor by neurons in vivo.

Authors:  C Sternini; M Spann; B Anton; D E Keith; N W Bunnett; M von Zastrow; C Evans; N C Brecha
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-08-20       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Opioid receptor trafficking and interaction in nociceptors.

Authors:  X Zhang; L Bao; S Li
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  Spinal Opioid Tolerance Depends upon Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Receptor-β Signaling, Not μ-Opioid Receptor Internalization.

Authors:  S Puig; K E Barker; S R Szott; P T Kann; J S Morris; H B Gutstein
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 4.436

Review 3.  Opioid receptor desensitization: mechanisms and its link to tolerance.

Authors:  Stéphane Allouche; Florence Noble; Nicolas Marie
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 4.  The Mechanisms Involved in Morphine Addiction: An Overview.

Authors:  Joanna Listos; Małgorzata Łupina; Sylwia Talarek; Antonina Mazur; Jolanta Orzelska-Górka; Jolanta Kotlińska
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.