Literature DB >> 2355371

Postanal repair: which patients derive most benefit?

J B Rainey1, D R Donaldson, J P Thomson.   

Abstract

Forty-two patients (37 women, 5 men; mean age 61 years) with varying degrees of anal sphincter dysfunction were treated by postanal repair. Results were analysed in relation to age, sex, presenting complaint and the results of preoperative anorectal physiological tests. Complete continence was restored in 13 (31%), while acceptable but slightly impaired control was achieved in a further 17 (40%). Twelve patients (29%) remained or became totally incontinent. The likelihood of a successful outcome was greater in those presenting with complete incontinence (77% improved) than in those retaining control of solid stool (29% improved, 29% unchanged, 43% worse). Age and sex had no effect on results but pudendal neuropathy, identified in 74% overall, slightly reduced the chance of success. In nine postoperative patients studied, neither the anorectal angle nor anal canal length bore any relation to the results of surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2355371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb        ISSN: 0035-8835


  4 in total

Review 1.  Fecal incontinence.

Authors:  M Lamah; D Kumar
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  [Long-term follow-up of Parks posterior repair. An electromyographic, manometric and radiologic study of 31 patients].

Authors:  S Athanasiadis; M Sanchez; A Kuprian
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1995

Review 3.  Surgery for faecal incontinence in adults.

Authors:  Steven R Brown; Himanshu Wadhawan; Richard L Nelson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-07-02

4.  Secondary surgery after failed postanal or anterior sphincter repair.

Authors:  A F Engel; W H Brummelkamp
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.571

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.