INTRODUCTION: In 1998, a multidisciplinary team of investigators initiated the Research on Adverse Drug events And Reports (RADAR) project, a post-marketing surveillance effort that systematically investigates and disseminates information describing serious and previously unrecognized serious adverse drug and device reactions (sADRs). OBJECTIVE: Herein, we describe the findings, dissemination efforts, and lessons learned from the first decade of the RADAR project. METHODS: After identifying serious and unexpected clinical events suitable for further investigation, RADAR collaborators derived case information from physician queries, published and unpublished clinical trials, case reports, US FDA databases and manufacturer sales figures. STUDY SELECTION: All major RADAR publications from 1998 to the present are included in this analysis. DATA EXTRACTION: For each RADAR publication, data were abstracted on data source, correlative basic science findings, dissemination and resultant safety information. RESULTS: RADAR investigators reported 43 serious ADRs. Data sources included case reports (17 sADRs), registries (5 sADRs), referral centers (8 sADRs) and clinical trial reports (13 sADRs). Correlative basic science findings were reported for ten sADRs. Thirty-seven sADRS were described as published case reports (5 sADRs) or published case-series (32 sADRs). Related safety information was disseminated as warnings or boxed warnings in the package insert (17 sADRs) and/or 'Dear Healthcare Professional' letters (14 sADRs). CONCLUSION: An independent National Institutes of Health-funded post-marketing surveillance programme can supplement existing regulatory and pharmaceutical manufacturer-supported drug safety initiatives.
INTRODUCTION: In 1998, a multidisciplinary team of investigators initiated the Research on Adverse Drug events And Reports (RADAR) project, a post-marketing surveillance effort that systematically investigates and disseminates information describing serious and previously unrecognized serious adverse drug and device reactions (sADRs). OBJECTIVE: Herein, we describe the findings, dissemination efforts, and lessons learned from the first decade of the RADAR project. METHODS: After identifying serious and unexpected clinical events suitable for further investigation, RADAR collaborators derived case information from physician queries, published and unpublished clinical trials, case reports, US FDA databases and manufacturer sales figures. STUDY SELECTION: All major RADAR publications from 1998 to the present are included in this analysis. DATA EXTRACTION: For each RADAR publication, data were abstracted on data source, correlative basic science findings, dissemination and resultant safety information. RESULTS: RADAR investigators reported 43 serious ADRs. Data sources included case reports (17 sADRs), registries (5 sADRs), referral centers (8 sADRs) and clinical trial reports (13 sADRs). Correlative basic science findings were reported for ten sADRs. Thirty-seven sADRS were described as published case reports (5 sADRs) or published case-series (32 sADRs). Related safety information was disseminated as warnings or boxed warnings in the package insert (17 sADRs) and/or 'Dear Healthcare Professional' letters (14 sADRs). CONCLUSION: An independent National Institutes of Health-funded post-marketing surveillance programme can supplement existing regulatory and pharmaceutical manufacturer-supported drug safety initiatives.
Authors: Charles L Bennett; Andrew M Evens; Leslie A Andritsos; Lakshmi Balasubramanian; Mark Mai; Matthew J Fisher; Timothy M Kuzel; Cara Angelotta; June M McKoy; Julie M Vose; Philip J Bierman; David J Kuter; Steven M Trifilio; Steven M Devine; Martin S Tallman Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2006-10-19 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: Jonathan R Nebeker; Renu Virmani; Charles L Bennett; Jennifer M Hoffman; Matthew H Samore; Jorge Alvarez; Charles J Davidson; June M McKoy; Dennis W Raisch; Brian K Whisenant; Paul R Yarnold; Steven M Belknap; Dennis P West; Jonathan E Gage; Richard E Morse; Gordana Gligoric; Laura Davidson; Marc D Feldman Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2005-12-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: A D Cohen; S M Luger; C Sickles; P A Mangan; D L Porter; S J Schuster; D E Tsai; S Nasta; A M Gewirtz; E A Stadtmauer Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Shilpa M Patel; Stuart Johnson; Steven M Belknap; Juliana Chan; Beverly E Sha; Charles Bennett Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2004-02-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Kenneth R Carson; Daniele Focosi; Eugene O Major; Mario Petrini; Elizabeth A Richey; Dennis P West; Charles L Bennett Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Anaadriana Zakarija; Nicholas Bandarenko; Dilip K Pandey; Amy Auerbach; Dennis W Raisch; Benjamin Kim; Hau C Kwaan; June M McKoy; Brian P Schmitt; Charles J Davidson; Paul R Yarnold; Philip B Gorelick; Charles L Bennett Journal: Stroke Date: 2004-01-05 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Javier Jimenez; Eran C Gwillim; Cory Kosche; Anna Figueiredo; Corrine Rauck; Stephanie M Rangel; Jennifer Choi; Dennis P West; Beatrice Nardone; Mario E Lacouture Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2020-01-31 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Beatrice Nardone; Elise Saddleton; Anne E Laumann; Beatrice J Edwards; Dennis W Raisch; June M McKoy; Steven M Belknap; Christian Bull; Anand Haryani; Shawn E Cowper; Ali K Abu-Alfa; Frank H Miller; Victoria Godinez-Puig; Vikas R Dharnidharka; Dennis P West Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2013-09-21
Authors: Beatrice Nardone; Sara Majewski; Ashley S Kim; Tina Kiguradze; Estela M Martinez-Escala; Rivka Friedland; Ahmad Amin; Anne E Laumann; Beatrice J Edwards; Alfred W Rademaker; Mary C Martini; Dennis P West Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: Alyx C Rosen; Yevgeniy Balagula; Dennis W Raisch; Vishvas Garg; Beatrice Nardone; Nicole Larsen; Jennifer Sorrell; Dennis P West; Milan J Anadkat; Mario E Lacouture Journal: Anticancer Drugs Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 2.248