Literature DB >> 23553340

Development and regulation of biosimilars: current status and future challenges.

Asterios S Tsiftsoglou1, Sol Ruiz, Christian K Schneider.   

Abstract

Biologic medicinal products developed via rDNA technology as recombinant protein-based medicines that have been in clinical use since the early 1980s as original biopharmaceuticals have greatly contributed to the therapy of severe metabolic and degenerative diseases. The recent expiration of the data protection or patents for most of them created opportunities for the development of copy versions of original biopharmaceuticals with similar biologic activity (termed biosimilars). Production of these new products is expected to meet worldwide demand, promote market competition, maintain the incentives for innovation, and sustain the healthcare systems. The licencing of these products, however, relies on the experience gained with the original biopharmaceuticals. Critical issues related to this class of medicinal products include their terminology (to avoid confusion with generics and non-innovator copy versions that have not been tested according to the biosimilar guidelines), manufacturing, and regulation. The European Union (EU) has been the first to establish a regulatory framework for marketing authorization application (MAA) and has named these products biosimilars, a term also recently adopted by the US FDA. Unlike the conventional, more common small molecular weight human medicines and chemical generics, protein-based medicines exhibit higher molecular weight, complexity in structure and function that can be affected by changes in the manufacturing process. Therefore, biosimilars represent a relatively heterogeneous class of medicinal products that make their regulation quite challenging. According to the current understanding in the EU, a biosimilar is a copy version of an already authorized biopharmaceutical (or reference product) with similar biologic activity, physicochemical characteristics, efficacy, and safety, based on a full comparability exercise at quality, preclinical and clinical level to ensure similar efficacy and safety. Guidance has been provided through several Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) guidelines as well as individual scientific advice requested from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) by various companies for the development and regulation of biosimilars. This review is mainly focused on the current status of regulation of biosimilars in the EU as well as on future challenges lying ahead for the improvement of the requirements needed for the marketing authorization of biosimilars. Emphasis is given on the quality requirements concerning these medicinal products (biologics).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23553340     DOI: 10.1007/s40259-013-0020-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BioDrugs        ISSN: 1173-8804            Impact factor:   5.807


  18 in total

Review 1.  Regulatory and clinical considerations for biosimilar oncology drugs.

Authors:  Charles L Bennett; Brian Chen; Terhi Hermanson; Michael D Wyatt; Richard M Schulz; Peter Georgantopoulos; Samuel Kessler; Dennis W Raisch; Zaina P Qureshi; Z Kevin Lu; Bryan L Love; Virginia Noxon; Laura Bobolts; Melissa Armitage; John Bian; Paul Ray; Richard J Ablin; William J Hrushesky; Iain C Macdougall; Oliver Sartor; James O Armitage
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  Biosimilars: Imitation Games.

Authors:  Hussain Dahodwala; Susan T Sharfstein
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 3.  Biosimilars in IBD: from theory to practice.

Authors:  Silvio Danese; Stefanos Bonovas; Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 46.802

4.  Assessment of structural and functional similarity of biosimilar products: Rituximab as a case study.

Authors:  Neh Nupur; Nidhi Chhabra; Rozaleen Dash; Anurag S Rathore
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 5.857

Review 5.  Generic Substitution of Orphan Drugs for the Treatment of Rare Diseases: Exploring the Potential Challenges.

Authors:  Antonello Di Paolo; Elena Arrigoni
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Availability and quality of illegitimate somatropin products obtained from the Internet.

Authors:  Róbert György Vida; András Fittler; Ivett Mikulka; Eszter Ábrahám; Viktor Sándor; Ferenc Kilár; Lajos Botz
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2016-11-25

7.  Epoetin Alpha and Epoetin Zeta: A Comparative Study on Stimulation of Angiogenesis and Wound Repair in an Experimental Model of Burn Injury.

Authors:  Natasha Irrera; Alessandra Bitto; Gabriele Pizzino; Mario Vaccaro; Francesco Squadrito; Mariarosaria Galeano; Francesco Stagno d'Alcontres; Ferdinando Stagno d'Alcontres; Michele Buemi; Letteria Minutoli; Michele Rosario Colonna; Domenica Altavilla
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 8.  Regulatory considerations in oncologic biosimilar drug development.

Authors:  Judith C Macdonald; Helen Hartman; Ira A Jacobs
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.857

Review 9.  Epoetin zeta in the management of anemia associated with chronic kidney disease, differential pharmacology and clinical utility.

Authors:  Mary Lynn Davis-Ajami; Jun Wu; Katherine Downton; Emilie Ludeman; Virginia Noxon
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2014-04-16

10.  Biosimilars: the process is the product. The example of recombinant streptokinase.

Authors:  C Thelwell; C Longstaff
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 5.824

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.