Literature DB >> 23552657

Computational dosimetry of induced electric fields during realistic movements in the vicinity of a 3 T MRI scanner.

Ilkka Laakso1, Sami Kännälä, Kari Jokela.   

Abstract

Medical staff working near magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners are exposed both to the static magnetic field itself and also to electric currents that are induced in the body when the body moves in the magnetic field. However, there are currently limited data available on the induced electric field for realistic movements. This study computationally investigates the movement induced electric fields for realistic movements in the magnetic field of a 3 T MRI scanner. The path of movement near the MRI scanner is based on magnetic field measurements using a coil sensor attached to a human volunteer. Utilizing realistic models for both the motion of the head and the magnetic field of the MRI scanner, the induced fields are computationally determined using the finite-element method for five high-resolution numerical anatomical models. The results show that the time-derivative of the magnetic flux density (dB/dt) is approximately linearly proportional to the induced electric field in the head, independent of the position of the head with respect to the magnet. This supports the use of dB/dt measurements for occupational exposure assessment. For the path of movement considered herein, the spatial maximum of the induced electric field is close to the basic restriction for the peripheral nervous system and exceeds the basic restriction for the central nervous system in the international guidelines. The 99th percentile electric field is a considerably less restrictive metric for the exposure than the spatial maximum electric field; the former is typically 60-70% lower than the latter. However, the 99th percentile electric field may exceed the basic restriction for dB/dt values that can be encountered during tasks commonly performed by MRI workers. It is also shown that the movement-induced eddy currents may reach magnitudes that could electrically stimulate the vestibular system, which could play a significant role in the generation of vertigo-like sensations reported by people moving in a strong static magnetic field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23552657     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/8/2625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of exposure to (ultra) high static magnetic fields during activities around human MRI scanners.

Authors:  Mahsa Fatahi; Jolanta Karpowicz; Krzysztof Gryz; Amirmohammad Fattahi; Georg Rose; Oliver Speck
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 2.  Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields in magnetic resonance environment: basic aspects and review of exposure assessment approaches.

Authors:  Valentina Hartwig; Stefania Romeo; Olga Zeni
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 3.  Vestibular stimulation by magnetic fields.

Authors:  Bryan K Ward; Dale C Roberts; Charles C Della Santina; John P Carey; David S Zee
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Occupational Exposure Assessment of the Static Magnetic Field Generated by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy: A Case Study.

Authors:  Valentina Hartwig; Carlo Sansotta; Maria Sole Morelli; Barbara Testagrossa; Giuseppe Acri
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 5.  Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields in magnetic resonance environment: an update on regulation, exposure assessment techniques, health risk evaluation, and surveillance.

Authors:  Valentina Hartwig; Giorgio Virgili; F Ederica Mattei; Cristiano Biagini; Stefania Romeo; Olga Zeni; Maria Rosaria Scarfì; Rita Massa; Francesco Campanella; Luigi Landini; Fabriziomaria Gobba; Alberto Modenese; Giulio Giovannetti
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Electric field calculation and peripheral nerve stimulation prediction for head and body gradient coils.

Authors:  Peter B Roemer; Trevor Wade; Andrew Alejski; Charles A McKenzie; Brian K Rutt
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 3.737

7.  Acute vertigo in an anesthesia provider during exposure to a 3T MRI scanner.

Authors:  Andrew Gorlin; Joseph M Hoxworth; William Pavlicek; Christopher A Thunberg; David Seamans
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2015-03-10

8.  Exploring magnetohydrodynamic voltage distributions in the human body: Preliminary results.

Authors:  T Stan Gregory; Jonathan R Murrow; John N Oshinski; Zion Tsz Ho Tse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Vestibular Extremely Low-Frequency Magnetic and Electric Stimulation Effects on Human Subjective Visual Vertical Perception.

Authors:  Nicolas Bouisset; Sébastien Villard; Alexandre Legros
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 1.848

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.