Kaloyan A Bikov1, C Daniel Mullins, Brian Seal, Eberechukwu Onukwugha, Nader Hanna. 1. *Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD †Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Wayne, NJ ‡Department of Surgery, Division of General and Oncologic Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Metastatic colon cancer (mCC) patients often receive multiple lines of chemotherapy/biological treatment (TX), yet subsequent TX lines have not been sufficiently examined using SEER-Medicare data. We developed an algorithm that identifies the number and type of TX lines received by mCC patients. METHODS: The algorithm rules for detecting TX lines were developed a priori and applied to SEER-Medicare data for 7951 elderly mCC patients, diagnosed in 2003-2007 and followed through 2009. Statistical analysis estimated the relationship between the number of treatments received and patient characteristics. Sensitivity analyses examined how results changed when different algorithm rules were used. RESULTS: Only 41% (3266) of mCC patients received any chemotherapy/biologics treatment; 1440 (18% of all, 44% of treated) and 274 (3% of all, 8% of treated) received second-line and third-line treatment, respectively. Initial and subsequent treatment regimens varied widely. Results were robust to alterations in the algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: The number of drugs used to treat cancer patients has increased during the past decade. Patients may have several TX lines with complex regimens. More guidance is needed with regard to identifying and studying these interventions using SEER-Medicare data. By proposing 1 approach to categorizing TX lines for mCC patients, we hope to empower the scientific community and to advance the use of SEER-Medicare data for health outcomes research.
BACKGROUND:Metastatic colon cancer (mCC) patients often receive multiple lines of chemotherapy/biological treatment (TX), yet subsequent TX lines have not been sufficiently examined using SEER-Medicare data. We developed an algorithm that identifies the number and type of TX lines received by mCC patients. METHODS: The algorithm rules for detecting TX lines were developed a priori and applied to SEER-Medicare data for 7951 elderly mCC patients, diagnosed in 2003-2007 and followed through 2009. Statistical analysis estimated the relationship between the number of treatments received and patient characteristics. Sensitivity analyses examined how results changed when different algorithm rules were used. RESULTS: Only 41% (3266) of mCC patients received any chemotherapy/biologics treatment; 1440 (18% of all, 44% of treated) and 274 (3% of all, 8% of treated) received second-line and third-line treatment, respectively. Initial and subsequent treatment regimens varied widely. Results were robust to alterations in the algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: The number of drugs used to treat cancerpatients has increased during the past decade. Patients may have several TX lines with complex regimens. More guidance is needed with regard to identifying and studying these interventions using SEER-Medicare data. By proposing 1 approach to categorizing TX lines for mCC patients, we hope to empower the scientific community and to advance the use of SEER-Medicare data for health outcomes research.
Authors: Michael J Hassett; Hajime Uno; Angel M Cronin; Nikki M Carroll; Mark C Hornbrook; Paul Fishman; Debra P Ritzwoller Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Date: 2017-07-12 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: Nikki M Carroll; Kate M Burniece; Jeff Holzman; Deanna B McQuillan; Angela Plata; Debra P Ritzwoller Journal: JCO Clin Cancer Inform Date: 2017-11
Authors: Gregory S Calip; Judith A Malmgren; Wan-Ju Lee; Stephen M Schwartz; Henry G Kaplan Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2015-10-08 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Jukka M Rintala; Pirita R Tahvonen; Saija T Vuolio; Ilpo T Typpö; Kai A Suokanerva; Heikki I Huhta Journal: Gastrointest Tumors Date: 2020-11-18
Authors: Gregory S Calip; Kellyn M Moran; Karen I Sweiss; Pritesh R Patel; Zhaoju Wu; Sruthi Adimadhyam; Todd A Lee; Naomi Y Ko; John G Quigley; Brian C-H Chiu Journal: Cancer Date: 2018-12-12 Impact factor: 6.921
Authors: Kaloyan A Bikov; C Daniel Mullins; Anna Hung; Brian Seal; Eberechukwu Onukwugha; Nader Hanna Journal: Oncologist Date: 2016-04-28 Impact factor: 5.837
Authors: Abdalla Aly; Prianka Singh; Beata Korytowsky; You-Li Ling; Hrishikesh P Kale; Homa B Dastani; Marc F Botteman; Andrew D Norden Journal: Neurooncol Pract Date: 2019-09-30