Literature DB >> 23552341

Biomechanical analysis of squat jump and countermovement jump from varying starting positions.

Krzysztof Mackala1, Jacek Stodółka, Adam Siemienski, Milan Coh.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of 2 strategies, defined by foot placement during the initiation of the take-off on performance in vertical jumps. The additional area of interest in this experiment was whether technique of the take-off phase might be an exploratory factor that has different electromyogram (EMG) muscle activity during squat jump (SJ) and countermovement jump (CMJ) performed starting from the standard position, with parallel foot placement, and from the experimental one, with straddle foot placement. Six well-experienced male 100-400 m sprinters, who were members of the Polish youth and senior national team (mean values: age 21.6 years, best performance: 100 m in 10.54 seconds and 400 m in 45.54 seconds), performed vertical SJ and vertical CMJ from 2 initial positions with different foot placement. To collect all selected kinematic and kinetic data, the video recording system BTS Vixta was used in conjunction with force platforms (Kistler model 9286B). The latest system for 3D motion analysis, BTS SMART, based on the passive IR reflective markers was also applied. Electromyograms of 6 lower limb muscles were collected using a Noraxon EMG device. The CMJ was on average 7 cm higher than the SJ (CMJ, 85 cm and SJ, 78 cm), which amounts to 8.97%. This was not because of the increase of center of gravity (COG) velocity at take-off because velocities of center of gravity (COG) projection were almost equal (SJ, 2.93 m·scompared with CMJ, 2.99 m·s). No significant differences of both magnitude and rate of development of the muscle torques and powers between jumps were found, but when we analyzed the problem with division into single legs (right and left) and with division into different jumps (SJ and CMJ), the differences were evident. The profiles of EMG activity of selected muscles showed some differences between SJ and CMJ. The vertical SJ and CMJ performance measurement may be of value to coaches and conditioning specialists who wish to develop or assess the power ability of lower extremities either unilaterally (single leg) or bilaterally (sum of both legs).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23552341     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31828909ec

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  8 in total

1.  Sex influence on muscle synergies in a ballistic force-velocity test during the delayed recovery phase after a graded endurance run.

Authors:  Robin Macchi; Alessandro Santuz; Arnaud Hays; Fabrice Vercruyssen; Adamantios Arampatzis; Avner Bar-Hen; Caroline Nicol
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-06-09

2.  Unsupervised Clustering Techniques Identify Movement Strategies in the Countermovement Jump Associated With Musculoskeletal Injury Risk During US Marine Corps Officer Candidates School.

Authors:  Matthew B Bird; Qi Mi; Kristen J Koltun; Mita Lovalekar; Brian J Martin; AuraLea Fain; Angelique Bannister; Angelito Vera Cruz; Tim L A Doyle; Bradley C Nindl
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  Neuromuscular Activity of Upper and Lower Limbs during two Backstroke Swimming Start Variants.

Authors:  Karla De Jesus; Kelly De Jesus; Alexandre I A Medeiros; Pedro Gonçalves; Pedro Figueiredo; Ricardo J Fernandes; João Paulo Vilas-Boas
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Knee strength ratios in competitive female athletes.

Authors:  Jaroslaw Kabacinski; Michal Murawa; Krzysztof Mackala; Lechoslaw Bogdan Dworak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Alfredson versus Silbernagel exercise therapy in chronic midportion Achilles tendinopathy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Bas Habets; Robert E H van Cingel; Frank J G Backx; Bionka M A Huisstede
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  The Effect of Height on Drop Jumps in Relation to Somatic Parameters and Landing Kinetics.

Authors:  Krzysztof Mackala; Samo Rauter; Jozef Simenko; Robi Kreft; Jacek Stodolka; Jozef Krizaj; Milan Coh; Janez Vodicar
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Human Lower Limb Joint Biomechanics in Daily Life Activities: A Literature Based Requirement Analysis for Anthropomorphic Robot Design.

Authors:  Martin Grimmer; Ahmed A Elshamanhory; Philipp Beckerle
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2020-02-11

8.  Relationship of Performance Measures and Muscle Activity between a 180° Change of Direction Task and Different Countermovement Jumps.

Authors:  Hallvard Nygaard Falch; Håvard Guldteig Rædergård; Roland Van den Tillaar
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.