Literature DB >> 23552224

Self-reported hypertension and use of antihypertensive medication among adults - United States, 2005-2009.

.   

Abstract

Hypertension affects one third of adults in the United States and is a major risk factor for heart disease and stroke. A previous report found differences in the prevalence of hypertension among racial/ethnic populations in the United States; blacks had a higher prevalence of hypertension, and Hispanics had the lowest use of antihypertensive medication. Recent variations in geographic differences in hypertension prevalence in the United States are less well known. To assess state-level trends in self-reported hypertension and treatment among U.S. adults, CDC analyzed 2005-2009 data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). The results indicated wide variation among states in the prevalence of self-reported diagnosed hypertension and use of antihypertensive medications. In 2009, the age-adjusted prevalence of self-reported hypertension ranged from 20.9% in Minnesota to 35.9% in Mississippi. The proportion reporting use of antihypertensive medications among those who reported hypertension ranged from 52.3% in California to 74.1% in Tennessee. From 2005 to 2009, nearly all states had an increased prevalence of self-reported hypertension, with percentage-point increases ranging from 0.2 for Virginia (from 26.9% to 27.1%) to 7.0 for Kentucky (from 27.5% to 34.5%). Overall, from 2005 to 2009, the prevalence of self-reported hypertension among U.S. adults increased from 25.8% to 28.3%. Among those reporting hypertension, the proportion using antihypertensive medications increased from 61.1% to 62.6%. Increased knowledge of the differences in self-reported prevalence of hypertension and use of antihypertensive medications by state can help in guiding programs to prevent heart disease, stroke, and other complications of uncontrolled hypertension, including those conducted by state and local public health agencies and health-care providers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23552224      PMCID: PMC4605009     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep        ISSN: 0149-2195            Impact factor:   17.586


Hypertension affects one third of adults in the United States (1) and is a major risk factor for heart disease and stroke (2). A previous report found differences in the prevalence of hypertension among racial/ethnic populations in the United States; blacks had a higher prevalence of hypertension, and Hispanics had the lowest use of antihypertensive medication (3). Recent variations in geographic differences in hypertension prevalence in the United States are less well known (4). To assess state-level trends in self-reported hypertension and treatment among U.S. adults, CDC analyzed 2005–2009 data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). The results indicated wide variation among states in the prevalence of self-reported diagnosed hypertension and use of antihypertensive medications. In 2009, the age-adjusted prevalence of self-reported hypertension ranged from 20.9% in Minnesota to 35.9% in Mississippi. The proportion reporting use of antihypertensive medications among those who reported hypertension ranged from 52.3% in California to 74.1% in Tennessee. From 2005 to 2009, nearly all states had an increased prevalence of self-reported hypertension, with percentage-point increases ranging from 0.2 for Virginia (from 26.9% to 27.1%) to 7.0 for Kentucky (from 27.5% to 34.5%). Overall, from 2005 to 2009, the prevalence of self-reported hypertension among U.S. adults increased from 25.8% to 28.3%. Among those reporting hypertension, the proportion using antihypertensive medications increased from 61.1% to 62.6%. Increased knowledge of the differences in self-reported prevalence of hypertension and use of antihypertensive medications by state can help in guiding programs to prevent heart disease, stroke, and other complications of uncontrolled hypertension, including those conducted by state and local public health agencies and health-care providers. BRFSS is a state-based telephone survey of health behaviors among adults aged ≥18 years.* The survey has been conducted by state health departments, with assistance from CDC, since 1984. Questions on hypertension are asked in odd-numbered years. Since 2005, two questions about hypertension have been included in BRFSS. The first question is, “Have you ever been told by a doctor, nurse, or other health professional that you have high blood pressure?” Respondents who answer “yes” to the first question are then asked, “Are you currently taking medicine for your high blood pressure?” These questions were used to assess prevalence of self-reported hypertension and proportion reporting antihypertensive medication use among those with reported hypertension in 2005, 2007, and 2009. Estimates were calculated for the United States overall and for the 50 states and the District of Columbia. In addition to analysis by state, estimates were analyzed by age group, sex, race/ethnicity,† and level of education. Age-adjusted estimates were calculated using the 2000 U.S. standard population. Linear trends were assessed using orthogonal polynomial coefficients, and results were considered significant at p<0.05. Median state response rates for BRFSS were 51.1% (range: 34.6%–67.4%) in 2005, 50.6% (range: 26.9%–65.4%) in 2007, and 52.5% (range: 37.9%–66.9%) in 2009. Total respondents were 356,112 in 2005, 430,912 in 2007, and 432,617 in 2009. State sample sizes ranged from 2,432 in 2009 (Alaska) to 39,549 in 2007 (Florida). From 2005 to 2009, overall age-adjusted prevalence of self-reported hypertension in the United States increased from 25.8% to 28.3% (Table 1). Self-reported hypertension ranged from 21.1% (Colorado) to 33.5% (Mississippi) in 2005, and from 20.9% (Minnesota) to 35.9% (Mississippi) in 2009. From 2005 to 2009, nearly all states had an increased prevalence of self-reported hypertension, with percentage-point increases ranging from 0.2 for Virginia (from 26.9% to 27.1%) to 7.0 for Kentucky (from 27.5% to 34.5%). In 2009, the prevalence of self-reported hypertension was, in general, higher in southern states and lower in western states (Figure).
TABLE 1

Age-adjusted prevalence of self-reported hypertension among adults, by sociodemographic characteristics and location — Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2005–2009

Characteristic/Location200520072009Percentage- point change 2005 to 2009% change 2005 to 2009p-value for trend



%(95% CI)%(95% CI)%(95% CI)
Total 25.8 (25.6–26.1) 26.9 (26.7–27.2) 28.3 (28.0–28.5) 2.5 9.7 0.001
Age group (yrs)
 18–4410.8(10.5–11.2)11.8(11.5–12.2)13.3(12.9–13.7)2.523.1<0.001
 45–6435.0(34.5–35.5)36.2(35.8–36.7)37.1(36.7–37.5)2.16.0<0.001
 ≥6556.0(55.4–56.7)58.1(57.6–58.7)59.6(59.2–60.1)3.66.4<0.001
Sex
 Men26.8(26.4–27.2)28.5(28.1–28.9)30.3(29.9–30.7)3.513.1<0.001
 Women24.7(24.4–25.0)25.3(25.1–25.6)26.2(25.9–26.5)3.56.1<0.001
Race/Ethnicity *
 White24.6(24.3–24.8)25.8(25.6–26.0)27.1(26.8–27.3)2.510.2<0.001
 Black36.3(35.4–37.3)38.1(37.2–39.0)39.6(38.7–40.6)3.39.1<0.001
 Asian/Pacific Islander21.3(19.0–23.8)21.5(19.4–23.8)24.0(22.4–25.7)2.712.70.066
 American Indian/Alaska Native30.8(28.1–33.8)31.0(28.6–33.4)32.0(29.8–34.3)1.23.90.536
 Hispanic26.4(25.3–27.5)26.4(25.4–27.4)27.6(26.8–28.5)1.24.50.092
Education
 <High school31.2(30.2–32.2)30.6(29.6–31.5)33.6(32.7–34.6)2.47.7<0.001
 High school28.1(27.7–28.6)30.1(29.6–30.6)31.4(30.9–31.9)3.311.7<0.001
 Some college26.2(25.7–26.7)27.8(27.3–28.3)29.2(28.8–29.7)3.011.5<0.001
 ≥College21.5(21.1–21.9)22.5(22.1–22.9)23.8(23.4–24.2)2.310.7<0.001
State/Area
 Alabama30.2(28.6–31.9)31.9(30.5–33.3)34.0(32.4–35.6)3.812.40.001
 Alaska23.6(21.5–25.7)27.1(24.7–29.7)27.9(25.7–30.0)4.318.50.006
 Arizona22.1(20.4–24.0)24.2(22.3–26.3)25.7(23.8–27.6)3.616.00.007
 Arkansas27.9(26.7–29.2)29.8(28.5–31.2)32.2(30.4–34.1)4.315.3<0.001
 California26.5(25.2–27.9)25.8(24.5–27.1)26.1(25.3–26.9)−0.4−1.70.569
 Colorado21.1(20.1–22.1)22.0(21.3–22.8)22.7(21.8–23.6)1.67.60.019
 Connecticut22.4(21.2–23.7)24.5(23.3–25.8)25.4(24.0–26.8)3.013.30.002
 Delaware27.3(25.7–28.9)28.2(26.6–29.8)29.1(27.4–30.8)1.86.50.135
 District of Columbia28.5(26.9–30.2)29.1(27.5–30.8)27.0(25.5–28.5)−1.5−5.40.184
 Florida25.0(23.7–26.2)25.2(24.3–26.1)27.7(26.3–29.2)2.711.00.004
 Georgia28.1(26.8–29.4)31.0(29.7–32.2)31.6(29.8–33.4)3.512.40.003
 Hawaii23.2(21.8–24.5)27.2(25.9–28.6)28.4(27.1–29.8)5.222.9<0.001
 Idaho23.7(22.5–24.9)25.9(24.5–27.2)25.4(24.1–26.8)1.77.20.065
 Illinois25.4(24.2–26.7)27.6(26.2–28.9)28.4(27.0–29.8)3.011.70.002
 Indiana25.7(24.5–26.9)27.0(25.8–28.3)30.3(29.2–31.4)4.617.6<0.001
 Iowa22.9(21.7–24.0)25.0(23.8–26.2)26.1(24.8–27.5)3.214.3<0.001
 Kansas23.7(22.8–24.6)26.1(25.1–27.1)27.6(26.8–28.3)3.916.4<0.001
 Kentucky27.5(26.2–28.9)28.6(27.2–30.0)34.5(33.0–36.1)7.025.5<0.001
 Louisiana29.3(27.6–31.0)31.3(30.0–32.7)34.6(33.3–35.9)5.318.2<0.001
 Maine24.0(22.6–25.4)26.5(25.1–27.8)27.3(26.1–28.5)3.314.0<0.001
 Maryland25.7(24.6–26.7)28.4(27.2–29.6)28.6(27.3–29.8)2.911.3<0.001
 Massachusetts24.1(23.0–25.2)25.1(24.3–25.8)24.5(23.6–25.5)0.41.70.57
 Michigan27.1(26.3–28.0)27.8(26.6–29.0)28.7(27.6–29.8)1.65.70.03
 Minnesota21.8(20.4–23.3)21.0(19.9–22.2)20.9(19.7–22.2)−0.9−4.20.346
 Mississippi33.5(32.0–34.9)33.3(32.1–34.5)35.9(34.7–37.0)2.47.10.013
 Missouri26.4(24.9–28.0)28.2(26.6–29.9)28.9(27.3–30.5)2.59.30.032
 Montana22.5(21.1–23.9)23.4(22.2–24.6)25.7(24.5–27.0)3.214.6<0.001
 Nebraska23.8(22.8–24.9)25.4(24.0–26.8)25.5(24.4–26.6)1.77.10.027
 Nevada24.2(22.2–26.2)26.9(25.2–28.8)26.6(24.6–28.6)2.49.90.099
 New Hampshire22.5(21.4–23.6)24.6(23.5–25.8)26.9(25.4–28.4)4.419.7<0.001
 New Jersey24.3(23.5–25.2)26.7(25.3–28.2)26.7(25.6–27.8)2.49.9<0.001
 New Mexico22.3(21.2–23.5)24.8(23.5–26.1)25.8(24.6–27.0)3.515.6<0.001
 New York24.9(23.9–26.0)26.2(25.0–26.2)27.5(26.1–28.9)2.610.30.004
 North Carolina29.1(28.3–29.9)28.4(27.5–29.2)30.6(29.5–31.8)1.55.30.03
 North Dakota21.8(20.6–23.0)24.5(23.2–25.7)25.3(24.0–26.6)3.515.8<0.001
 Ohio25.9(24.5–27.3)26.9(25.9–27.9)29.8(28.6–31.1)3.915.2<0.001
 Oklahoma29.0(27.9–30.1)29.9(28.7–31.1)32.2(31.1–33.5)3.311.3<0.001
 Oregon22.9(22.2–23.7)25.4(24.1–26.8)25.6(24.1–27.2)2.711.70.002
 Pennsylvania25.1(24.1–26.1)25.7(24.6–26.9)29.2(28.0–30.5)4.116.4<0.001
 Rhode Island25.5(24.0–27.0)27.1(25.7–28.5)28.7(27.3–30.1)3.212.80.002
 South Carolina30.8(29.8–31.8)29.3(28.2–30.4)31.1(29.6–32.6)0.30.90.762
 South Dakota23.9(22.9–25.0)24.1(23.0–25.2)27.8(26.5–29.2)3.916.3<0.001
 Tennessee29.6(27.9–31.3)32.0(30.2–33.8)30.8(29.0–32.7)1.24.30.316
 Texas25.6(24.4–26.7)28.3(27.4–29.2)29.6(28.4–30.9)4.016.0<0.001
 Utah21.2(20.0–22.4)22.4(21.2–23.7)25.5(24.5–26.5)4.320.1<0.001
 Vermont22.7(21.8–23.7)23.3(22.2–24.5)25.1(23.9–26.3)2.410.40.003
 Virginia26.9(25.5–28.4)26.5(25.1–28.0)27.1(25.5–28.8)0.20.70.867
 Washington24.1(23.5–24.8)25.2(24.6–25.8)27.5(26.7–28.2)3.413.8<0.001
 West Virginia28.8(27.3–30.3)30.4(28.9–31.9)34.6(33.1–36.3)5.820.2<0.001
 Wisconsin24.3(23.1–25.6)25.2(23.9–26.5)26.4(24.7–28.1)2.18.50.054
 Wyoming22.6(21.5–23.8)24.1(22.9–25.2)25.0(23.9–26.2)2.410.70.004

Abbreviation: CI = confidence interval.

In this report, persons identified as Hispanic might be of any race. Persons identified as black, white, Asian/Pacific Islander, or American Indian/Alaska Native are non-Hispanic. The five racial/ethnic categories are mutually exclusive.

FIGURE

Age-adjusted prevalence of self-reported hypertension among adults and the proportion of those participants reporting use of antihypertensive medication, by state — Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2009

Among those with self-reported hypertension, the estimated number of participants reporting use of antihypertensive medications was 45,023,301 in 2005, 50,191,337 in 2007, and 53,602,447 in 2009; the proportion increased from 61.1% (2005) to 62.6% (2009). In 2009, among those with self-reported hypertension, the proportion reporting current use of antihypertensive medication was highest in Tennessee (74.1%) and lowest in California (52.3%); however, Tennessee showed no significant change in reported antihypertensive medication use from 2005 to 2009, whereas California had a significant increase, from 48.0% to 52.3%. As with self-reported hypertension, the proportion of participants reporting use of antihypertensive medication generally was higher in southern states and lower in western states (Figure). States that showed significant increases in use of antihypertensive medications included California, Iowa, and Michigan, whereas Kentucky, Nebraska, and Rhode Island had significant decreases. By selected characteristics, self-reported hypertension prevalence in 2009 was significantly higher among persons aged ≥65 years (59.6%) compared with persons aged 18–44 years (13.3%) and 45–64 years (37.1%); among men (30.3%) compared with women (26.2%); among blacks (39.6%) compared with American Indian/Alaska Natives (32.0%), Hispanics (27.6%), whites (27.1%), and Asian/Pacific Islanders (24.0%); and among those with less than a high school education (33.6%) compared with those with a high school education (31.4%), those with some college (29.2%), and those with a college degree or higher (23.8%). From 2005 to 2009, the prevalence of self-reported hypertension increased for all sociodemographic subgroups, although the linear trends were not significant for Hispanics, Asian/Pacific Islanders, and American Indian/Alaska Natives (Table 1). Among persons reporting hypertension in 2009, the proportion reporting antihypertensive medication use was significantly higher among persons aged ≥65 years (94.1%) compared with those aged 18–44 years (45.1%) and 45–64 years (82.3%); among women (66.9%) compared with men (59.9%); and among blacks (71.6%) compared with Hispanics (55.2%) (Table 2). From 2005 to 2009, significant increases in self-reported use of antihypertensive medication among those reporting hypertension were observed among blacks (from 67.0% to 71.6%) and Hispanics (from 51.2% to 55.2%).
TABLE 2

Among participants with self-reported hypertension, age-adjusted proportion of those reporting use of antihypertensive medication among adults, by sociodemographic characteristics and location — Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2005–2009

Characteristic/Location200520072009Percentage-point change 2005 to 2009% change 2005 to 2009p-value for trend



%(95% CI)%(95% CI)%(95% CI)
Total 61.1 (60.3–61.9) 63.2 (62.4–64.0) 62.6 (61.8–63.5) 1.5 2.5 0.016
Age group (yrs)
 18–4443.6(42.1–45.1)47.5(45.9–49.1)45.1(43.6–46.6)1.53.40.172
 45–6480.0(79.2–80.8)82.2(81.5–82.8)82.3(81.7–82.8)2.32.9<0.001
 ≥6593.0(92.4–93.4)93.9(93.6–94.3)94.1(93.8–94.3)1.11.2<0.001
Sex
 Men58.0(56.8–59.1)61.1(59.9–62.2)59.9(58.8–61.1)1.93.30.014
 Women65.2(64.0–66.4)66.0(64.9–67.1)66.9(65.7–68.0)1.72.60.054
Race/Ethnicity *
 White62.4(61.4–63.4)64.3(63.3–65.2)62.4(61.5–63.3)0.00.00.964
 Black67.0(65.1–68.0)69.5(67.4–71.4)71.6(69.0–74.3)4.66.90.004
 Asian/Pacific Islander61.4(55.5–67.0)60.1(54.1–65.8)60.2(55.1–65.0)−1.2−2.00.752
 American Indian/Alaska Native59.8(52.4–66.8)61.9(56.5–67.0)61.8(56.3–67.1)2.03.30.668
 Hispanic51.2(48.6–53.7)54.9(52.5–57.3)55.2(53.0–57.3)4.07.80.019
Education
 <High school56.7(54.3–59.2)57.6(55.2–60.1)59.6(57.1–62.2)2.95.10.106
 High school62.4(60.9–63.8)63.5(62.0–64.9)62.9(61.3–64.4)0.50.80.645
 Some college61.3(59.9–62.7)64.0(62.6–65.4)62.8(61.4–64.1)1.52.40.138
≥College61.6(59.8–63.3)64.7(62.7–66.6)62.6(61.1–64.1)1.01.60.373
State/Area
 Alabama68.9(63.6–73.8)78.7(73.7–83.0)72.5(67.2–77.3)3.65.20.325
 Alaska54.3(49.3–59.2)59.4(52.8–65.7)53.8(47.7–59.8)−0.5−0.90.907
 Arizona60.8(52.7–68.3)59.1(51.4–66.4)58.9(52.7–64.9)−2.0−3.10.712
 Arkansas65.6(61.7–69.3)70.2(65.1–74.9)67.6(61.1–73.5)2.03.10.59
 California48.0(45.0–51.1)52.3(48.4–56.2)52.3(49.9–54.6)4.38.80.032
 Colorado55.5(51.6–59.4)57.0(53.7–60.2)57.0(53.6–60.3)1.52.60.588
 Connecticut64.8(58.2–70.9)64.9(59.8–69.7)59.9(55.5–64.1)−4.9−7.70.205
 Delaware66.2(61.8–70.4)62.5(58.1–66.8)62.7(58.2–67.0)−3.5−5.40.261
 District of Columbia61.7(56.9–66.4)59.9(55.7–63.9)59.6(55.2–63.8)−2.1−3.50.507
 Florida62.2(56.5–67.5)63.3(60.3–66.2)59.2(55.1–63.1)−3.0−4.80.385
 Georgia65.9(61.9–69.6)66.3(63.2–69.2)70.2(62.4–77.0)4.36.50.309
 Hawaii60.4(55.5–65.1)60.7(56.1–65.0)64.0(59.8–68.0)3.65.90.266
 Idaho53.5(49.4–57.5)58.3(52.8–63.6)56.2(51.4–60.8)2.75.00.398
 Illinois62.0(57.5–66.3)64.0(59.3–68.4)65.0(59.5–70.1)3.04.80.401
 Indiana64.3(60.7–67.8)66.7(61.9–71.2)63.9(60.3–67.3)−0.4−0.70.857
 Iowa57.6(53.3–61.9)62.1(58.0–65.9)66.1(61.0–70.9)8.514.70.012
 Kansas64.1(60.7–67.3)61.8(57.6–65.9)64.7(62.1–67.3)0.61.00.766
 Kentucky73.4(68.9–77.5)73.2(67.7–78.2)65.7(61.4–69.7)−7.7−10.60.011
 Louisiana73.4(68.3–78.0)76.3(72.2–79.9)71.4(67.4–75.0)−2.0−2.80.514
 Maine61.4(56.0–66.5)58.9(55.6–62.0)59.8(56.2–63.3)−1.6−2.60.623
 Maryland66.7(60.3–70.3)64.3(61.0–67.4)67.4(64.1–70.4)0.71.00.796
 Massachusetts58.1(54.2–62.0)61.7(59.1–64.2)59.3(55.9–62.6)1.22.00.655
 Michigan60.8(58.1–63.4)62.8(59.4–66.0)65.6(62.0–69.0)4.87.90.032
 Minnesota65.6(56.0–74.0)66.2(59.5–72.3)72.7(66.0–78.5)7.110.90.207
 Mississippi70.3(64.5–75.4)73.1(69.5–76.4)72.4(68.2–76.2)2.13.00.545
 Missouri65.7(60.8–70.2)61.3(57.5–64.9)63.3(58.5–67.8)−2.4−3.60.482
 Montana52.0(48.0–55.9)56.5(52.6–60.4)58.4(52.3–64.3)6.412.40.08
 Nebraska65.6(60.9–70.1)62.4(57.8–66.8)58.9(55.3–62.4)−6.7−10.30.023
 Nevada49.9(44.7–55.1)52.4(47.5–57.3)55.3(49.4–61.1)5.410.80.178
 New Hampshire59.6(55.9–63.1)57.2(53.5–60.9)57.6(53.3–61.8)−2.0−3.30.495
 New Jersey60.9(58.1–63.6)62.0(58.4–65.5)64.7(60.2–69.0)3.86.30.147
 New Mexico60.0(53.6–66.0)61.9(56.8–66.6)55.8(52.0–59.5)−4.2−7.00.261
 New York59.7(56.2–63.0)61.0(57.0–64.8)61.2(57.3–65.0)1.52.60.546
 North Carolina63.5(61.5–65.5)67.5(64.2–70.5)66.7(62.8–70.4)3.25.00.152
 North Dakota63.5(58.8–68.0)57.6(53.8–61.4)64.6(59.8–69.1)1.11.70.75
 Ohio63.3(59.2–67.3)63.4(60.4–66.2)65.7(60.5–70.6)2.43.70.474
 Oklahoma67.2(63.3–70.8)64.3(60.4–68.0)63.8(59.8–67.6)−3.4−5.10.218
 Oregon56.8(53.4–60.1)56.1(51.2–61.0)58.1(53.0–63.1)1.32.40.667
 Pennsylvania62.2(59.1–65.3)64.2(60.5–67.8)64.3(60.4–68.1)2.13.30.412
 Rhode Island63.9(60.0–67.6)63.5(58.6–68.1)58.1(53.8–62.2)−5.8−9.10.045
 South Carolina69.3(65.7–72.7)69.3(65.5–72.8)65.7(61.9–69.3)−3.6−5.20.163
 South Dakota60.2(56.4–63.9)60.0(56.3–63.6)57.8(53.1–62.3)−2.4−4.00.429
 Tennessee75.5(68.5–81.4)72.3(66.8–77.1)74.1(66.8–80.3)−1.4−1.90.769
 Texas60.3(56.2–64.3)64.7(61.9–67.3)61.5(58.2–64.7)1.22.00.641
 Utah56.2(51.4–60.8)54.0(48.9–59.0)54.5(51.2–57.7)−1.7−3.00.563
 Vermont57.6(54.2–60.9)62.3(56.0–68.2)55.6(51.7–59.4)−2.0−3.50.445
 Virginia64.2(59.2–69.0)64.5(59.5–69.2)64.9(59.6–69.9)0.71.10.844
 Washington55.7(53.5–57.8)56.3(54.3–58.3)55.4(52.8–57.9)−0.3−0.50.875
 West Virginia65.6(62.0–69.1)72.2(67.4–76.5)70.5(66.0–74.5)4.97.40.089
 Wisconsin62.1(57.3–66.7)59.1(54.9–63.2)59.4(54.8–63.8)−2.7−4.40.416
 Wyoming60.2(55.2–64.9)59.9(55.0–64.7)55.0(51.6–58.4)−5.2−8.60.087

Abbreviation: CI = confidence interval.

In this report, persons identified as Hispanic might be of any race. Persons identified as black, white, Asian/Pacific Islander, or American Indian/Alaska Native are non-Hispanic. The five racial/ethnic categories are mutually exclusive.

Editorial Note

The findings in this report, using BRFSS data, indicate that from 2005 to 2009, a small but significant increase in the prevalence of self-reported hypertension was observed among U.S. adults. Among those with self-reported hypertension, the proportion who reported use of antihypertensive medication also increased significantly. In 2011, a report based on results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) showed that among adults aged ≥18 years, the prevalence of measured hypertension did not increase significantly from 1999–2002 to 2005–2008; however, the use of antihypertensive medication and control of hypertension showed significant increases (1). The prevalence of measured hypertension in NHANES did not increase during 1999–2008 (1); therefore, the increase in self-reported hypertension described in the current report likely is related to an increase in the awareness of hypertension. Measured blood pressure is not available with BRFSS surveys; therefore, hypertension control could not be assessed in the current report. The findings in this report show that among persons with hypertension, the proportion reporting antihypertensive medication use increased overall from 2005 to 2009; however, only a few states showed significant increases or decreases in the proportion reporting antihypertensive medication use. What is already known on this topic? Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease. In the United States, hypertension affects approximately one third of the adult population. Differences in prevalence of hypertension and use of antihypertensive medications exist among states and sociodemographic subgroups. As with this report, U.S. states and territories frequently use Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data to aid in tracking priority health conditions and behaviors and to support the targeting of limited programmatic resources to high-prevalence areas. What is added by this report? From 2005 to 2009, the prevalence of self-reported hypertension among U.S. adults increased from 25.8% to 28.3%. Among those with self-reported hypertension, use of antihypertensive medications increased from 61.1% to 62.6%. Among states, rates of self-reported hypertension in 2009 ranged from 20.9% to 35.9%. What are the implications for public health practice? Improving hypertension awareness and initiating appropriate treatment are important to increase blood pressure control and reduce risk for heart disease and stroke. The findings in this study provide public health practitioners information to help target blood pressure control efforts. Public health officials, particularly in those states with a high prevalence of hypertension, should consider a coordinated and multifactorial approach to blood pressure control with focused attention in areas including sodium reduction, health systems strategies such as promotion of the collection and use of quality measures, promotion of team-based care, and community-clinical linkages. Substantial differences among states were observed for self-reported hypertension prevalence, in general, the prevalence was higher in southern states than in other regions. Use of antihypertensive medication varied by state, but overall BRFSS estimates generally were consistent with other national estimates (5–7). The recent REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study found that, compared with whites, black participants were more aware of hypertension and more likely to be treated. However, among those treated, blacks were less likely than whites to have their blood pressure controlled (5). The high prevalence of hypertension in the southern states found in this study is in the “stroke belt,” a geographically identified region of high stroke morbidity and mortality, and likely is contributing to the disparate burden of disease in the region (8). The findings by sex were similar to results from NHANES 2005–2008, which found that anti-hypertensive treatment was lower among men than women (7). The findings in this report are subject to at least three limitations. First, data were self-reported, and hypertension and use of antihypertensive medications were not verified independently. Second, BRFSS surveys only noninstitutionalized persons with landline telephones; in 2009, 24.5% of U.S. households only had cellular telephone service (9). Finally, median state response rates for BRFSS were low; however, BRFSS provides the only available state-specific estimates of hypertension prevalence and antihypertensive medication use. Hypertension is a major modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease, and improving awareness of hypertension is an important first step to treating and controlling hypertension and preventing heart disease and stroke. Clinical guidelines for hypertension management emphasize the control of hypertension through participation in healthy lifestyle behaviors, and using appropriate and specific antihypertensives medications with integrated clinical systems to support sustained adherence (2). A CDC goal is to increase public health interventions in clinical and community settings to reduce the deleterious effects of hypertension by increasing awareness and control of high blood pressure.§ One effective intervention is the Community Preventive Services Task Force recommendation for use of team-based care to improve blood pressure control.¶ Currently, 41 states receive CDC funding to develop and implement heart disease and stroke prevention programs.** CDC’s National Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention Program works to increase prevention and control of high blood pressure through sodium reduction, health system strategies such as collection and use of quality measures, promotion of team-based care, and community-clinical linkages. In addition, the Million Hearts initiative, a public and private partnership co-led by CDC and the Centers for Medicare and Medicare Services, targets blood pressure control and seeks to align and coordinate resources across community and clinical settings (10). Increasing awareness of hypertension, improving hypertension control, and encouraging adherence to evidence-based practices addressing hypertension are needed, especially in those states with higher prevalence of hypertension and lower proportion of use of antihypertensive medications.
  8 in total

1.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Véronique L Roger; Alan S Go; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Emelia J Benjamin; Jarett D Berry; William B Borden; Dawn M Bravata; Shifan Dai; Earl S Ford; Caroline S Fox; Heather J Fullerton; Cathleen Gillespie; Susan M Hailpern; John A Heit; Virginia J Howard; Brett M Kissela; Steven J Kittner; Daniel T Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Diane M Makuc; Gregory M Marcus; Ariane Marelli; David B Matchar; Claudia S Moy; Dariush Mozaffarian; Michael E Mussolino; Graham Nichol; Nina P Paynter; Elsayed Z Soliman; Paul D Sorlie; Nona Sotoodehnia; Tanya N Turan; Salim S Virani; Nathan D Wong; Daniel Woo; Melanie B Turner
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Prevalence of hypertension by duration and age at exposure to the stroke belt.

Authors:  Virginia J Howard; Robert F Woolson; Brent M Egan; Joyce S Nicholas; Robert J Adams; George Howard; Daniel T Lackland
Journal:  J Am Soc Hypertens       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb

3.  US trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension, 1988-2008.

Authors:  Brent M Egan; Yumin Zhao; R Neal Axon
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Racial and geographic differences in awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension: the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke study.

Authors:  George Howard; Ron Prineas; Claudia Moy; Mary Cushman; Martha Kellum; Ella Temple; Andra Graham; Virginia Howard
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Million hearts: strategies to reduce the prevalence of leading cardiovascular disease risk factors--United States, 2011.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 17.586

6.  Vital signs: prevalence, treatment, and control of hypertension--United States, 1999-2002 and 2005-2008.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 17.586

7.  The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report.

Authors:  Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Cardiovascular disease risk factors and preventive practices among adults--United States, 1994: a behavioral risk factor atlas. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System State Coordinators.

Authors:  R A Hahn; G W Heath; M H Chang
Journal:  MMWR CDC Surveill Summ       Date:  1998-12-11
  8 in total
  15 in total

1.  Physical Activity and Perceived Health: Can Time Diary Measures of Momentary Well-Being Inform the Association?

Authors:  Sandra L Hofferth; Sarah M Flood; Deborah Carr; Yoonjoo Lee
Journal:  J Time Use Res       Date:  2018-12-09

2.  Cardiovascular Disease Screening By Community Health Workers Can Be Cost-Effective In Low-Resource Countries.

Authors:  Thomas Gaziano; Shafika Abrahams-Gessel; Sam Surka; Stephen Sy; Ankur Pandya; Catalina A Denman; Carlos Mendoza; Thandi Puoane; Naomi S Levitt
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Compensatory renal hypertrophy and the handling of an acute nephrotoxicant in a model of aging.

Authors:  Cláudia S Oliveira; Lucy Joshee; Rudolfs K Zalups; Christy C Bridges
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 4.032

4.  Maximizing Cardiovascular Event Reduction by Expanding and Intensifying the Targets.

Authors:  Boback Ziaeian; Gregg C Fonarow
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  State socioeconomic indicators and self-reported hypertension among US adults, 2011 behavioral risk factor surveillance system.

Authors:  Amy Z Fan; Sheryl M Strasser; Xingyou Zhang; Jing Fang; Carol G Crawford
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 2.830

6.  Sodium Intake Among U.S. Adults - 26 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2013.

Authors:  Jing Fang; Mary E Cogswell; Soyoun Park; Sandra L Jackson; Erika C Odom
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 17.586

7.  Prevalence and associated factors of self-reported hypertension among Tehran adults in 2011: a population-based study (Urban HEART-2).

Authors:  Bahman Cheraghian; Mohsen Asadi-Lari; Mohammad Ali Mansournia; Reza Majdzadeh; Kazem Mohammad; Saharnaz Nedjat; Mohammad Reza Vaez-Mahdavi; Soghrat Faghihzadeh
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2014-09-29

8.  Progress of health plans toward meeting the million hearts clinical target for high blood pressure control - United States, 2010-2012.

Authors:  Milesh M Patel; Bennett Datu; Dan Roman; Mary B Barton; Matthew D Ritchey; Hilary K Wall; Fleetwood Loustalot
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 17.586

9.  Initial report of the osteogenesis imperfecta adult natural history initiative.

Authors:  Laura L Tosi; Matthew E Oetgen; Marianne K Floor; Mary Beth Huber; Ann M Kennelly; Robert J McCarter; Melanie F Rak; Barbara J Simmonds; Melissa D Simpson; Carole A Tucker; Fergus E McKiernan
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 4.123

10.  Factors associated with antihypertensive treatment intensification and deintensification in older outpatients.

Authors:  Carole E Aubert; Jin-Kyung Ha; Eve A Kerr; Timothy P Hofer; Lillian Min
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Hypertens       Date:  2021-06-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.