Literature DB >> 23551867

Screening pigs for xenotransplantation: prevalence and expression of porcine endogenous retroviruses in Göttingen minipigs.

Marwan Semaan1, Avi Rotem, Uriel Barkai, Stefan Bornstein, Joachim Denner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To establish the safety of xenotransplantation when cells, tissues, or organs of pigs are used, an effective screening for potential zoonotic microorganisms has to be performed. In doing so, special attendance has to be paid to porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) that are widely distributed as proviruses in the genome of pigs. PERV-A and PERV-B are present in all pigs, they infect human cells in vitro and therefore represent a direct risk. PERV-C infects only pig cells; however, recombinant PERV-A/C infecting human cells and replicating at a higher rate were found in pigs indicating an indirect risk. To prevent the transmission of PERV, it was suggested to use animals characterized by a low expression of PERV-A and PERV-B that are free of PERV-C and cannot generate recombinants. Göttingen minipigs are used for numerous biomedical investigations and they are well characterized; however, the prevalence and the expression of PERV in these animals were not yet investigated.
METHODS: The presence and expression of all PERVs including a new variant (nv) of PERV-C and PERV-A/C were analyzed using PCR and real-time PCR methods. Altogether, 15 animals belonging to different families were analyzed. To make a low expression better measurable, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of the animals were stimulated with phytohaemagglutinin generally increasing the expression of PERV and allowing a better classification into animals with high and low expression. As a major end point, the release of virus particles able to infect susceptible human 293 cells was investigated.
RESULTS: PERV-A, PERV-B, PERV-C, and PERV-Cnv were found in the genome of all investigated Göttingen minipigs, but recombinant PERV-A/Cs were not found. When the expression of PERV was compared with that in previously analyzed pig strains, it was higher than in German landrace and some other pigs, but lower than in Yucatan miniature pigs. Virus particles able to infected human 293 cells were not detected even after mitogen treatment of the PBMCs.
CONCLUSION: The Göttingen minipigs are well defined concerning their physiologic parameters, their health status, and their genetics, and therefore, they may be considered as donor animals for at least cell xenotransplantation. When the prevalence and the expression of PERVs were analyzed in these animals, it was demonstrated that although PERV-A, -B, and -C proviruses were found in all animals, their expression was low. Additional investigations are required to assess the suitability of Göttingen minipigs and other animals for xenotransplantation in terms of microbiological safety.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Keywords:  infection assay; porcine endogenous retroviruses; real-time PCR; xenotransplantation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23551867     DOI: 10.1111/xen.12032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Xenotransplantation        ISSN: 0908-665X            Impact factor:   3.907


  14 in total

Review 1.  Islet cell xenotransplantation: a serious look toward the clinic.

Authors:  Kannan P Samy; Benjamin M Martin; Nicole A Turgeon; Allan D Kirk
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 3.907

2.  Infection in xenotransplantation: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Jay A Fishman
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.640

Review 3.  Review on porcine endogenous retrovirus detection assays--impact on quality and safety of xenotransplants.

Authors:  Antonia W Godehardt; Michael Rodrigues Costa; Ralf R Tönjes
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 3.907

4.  Characterization of PERV in a new conserved pig herd as potential donor animals for xenotransplantation in China.

Authors:  Fei Guo; Xiaowei Xing; Wayne J Hawthorne; Qiong Dong; Bin Ye; Juan Zhang; Qi Liang; Wei Nie; Wei Wang
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 4.099

5.  Extended Microbiological Characterization of Göttingen Minipigs in the Context of Xenotransplantation: Detection and Vertical Transmission of Hepatitis E Virus.

Authors:  Vladimir A Morozov; Alexey V Morozov; Avi Rotem; Uriel Barkai; Stefan Bornstein; Joachim Denner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Copy Number and Prevalence of Porcine Endogenous Retroviruses (PERVs) in German Wild Boars.

Authors:  Luise Krüger; Milena Stillfried; Carolin Prinz; Vanessa Schröder; Lena Katharina Neubert; Joachim Denner
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 7.  PERVading strategies and infectious risk for clinical xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Christopher G A McGregor; Yasu Takeuchi; Linda Scobie; Guerard Byrne
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.907

Review 8.  Preventing transfer of infectious agents.

Authors:  Joachim Denner; Nicolas J Mueller
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 6.071

Review 9.  How Active Are Porcine Endogenous Retroviruses (PERVs)?

Authors:  Joachim Denner
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 5.048

10.  A Comprehensive Strategy for Screening for Xenotransplantation-Relevant Viruses in a Second Isolated Population of Göttingen Minipigs.

Authors:  Luise Krüger; Yannick Kristiansen; Emelie Reuber; Lars Möller; Michael Laue; Christian Reimer; Joachim Denner
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2019-12-29       Impact factor: 5.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.