Literature DB >> 23551864

'Step-port' laparoscopic cystgastrostomy for the management of organized solid predominant post-acute fluid collections after severe acute pancreatitis.

Simon C Gibson1, Bernard F Robertson, Euan J Dickson, Colin J McKay, C Ross Carter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Post-acute pancreatic collections (PAPCs) may require intervention when persistent, large or symptomatic. An open cystgastrostomy is an effective treatment option particularly for larger, solid predominant collections. A laparoscopic cystgastrostomy (LCG) as initially described, could be technically challenging. This report describes the evolution of the operative technique and the results from LCG in a tertiary referral centre.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the unit's prospectively populated database was conducted. All patients who underwent a surgical cystgastrostomy (SCG) were identified. Patient demographics, outcome and complications were collected and analysed.
RESULTS: Forty-four patients underwent SCG: 8 open and 36 laparoscopic. Of the 36 LCG, 6 required open conversion, although with evolution of the technique all of the last 17 cases were completed laparoscopically. The median interquartile range (IQR) length of stay in patients completed laparoscopically was 6 (2-10) compared with 15.5 days (8-19) in those patients who were converted (P = 0.0351). The only peri-operative complication after a LCG was a self-limiting upper gastrointestinal bleed. With a median (IQR) follow-up of 891 days (527-1495) one patient required re-intervention for a residual collection with no recurrent collections identified.
CONCLUSION: LCG is a safe and effective procedure in patients with large, solid predominant PAPCs. With increased experience and technical expertise conversion rates can be lowered and outcome optimized.
© 2013 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23551864      PMCID: PMC3921013          DOI: 10.1111/hpb.12099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  18 in total

Review 1.  EUS in drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts.

Authors:  Paul Fockens
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Percutaneous necrosectomy and sinus tract endoscopy in the management of infected pancreatic necrosis: an initial experience.

Authors:  C R Carter; C J McKay; C W Imrie
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Percutaneous cystogastrostomy in patients with pancreatic pseudocysts.

Authors:  Roland Andersson; Wojciech Cwikiel
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  2002

Review 4.  Laparoscopic pancreatic cystgastrostomy.

Authors:  T Mori; N Abe; M Sugiyama; Y Atomi; L W Way
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2000

Review 5.  A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, Ga, September 11 through 13, 1992.

Authors:  E L Bradley
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1993-05

6.  Débridement and closed packing for the treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis.

Authors:  C Fernández-del Castillo; D W Rattner; M A Makary; A Mostafavi; D McGrath; A L Warshaw
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Minimally invasive retroperitoneal pancreatic necrosectomy.

Authors:  S Connor; P Ghaneh; M Raraty; R Sutton; E Rosso; C J Garvey; M L Hughes; J C Evans; P Rowlands; J P Neoptolemos
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 2.588

8.  Endoscopic therapy for organized pancreatic necrosis.

Authors:  T H Baron; W G Thaggard; D E Morgan; R J Stanley
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Management of infected pancreatic necrosis by open drainage.

Authors:  E L Bradley
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus.

Authors:  Peter A Banks; Thomas L Bollen; Christos Dervenis; Hein G Gooszen; Colin D Johnson; Michael G Sarr; Gregory G Tsiotos; Santhi Swaroop Vege
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  9 in total

1.  Cyst Gastrostomy and Necrosectomy for the Management of Sterile Walled-Off Pancreatic Necrosis: a Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgical and Endoscopic Outcomes at a High-Volume Pancreatic Center.

Authors:  Mohammad Khreiss; Mazen Zenati; Amber Clifford; Kenneth K Lee; Melissa E Hogg; Adam Slivka; Jennifer Chennat; Andres Gelrud; Herbert J Zeh; Georgios I Papachristou; Amer H Zureikat
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Getting the dead out: modern treatment strategies for necrotizing pancreatitis.

Authors:  Monica M Dua; David J Worhunsky; Sabina Amin; John D Louie; Walter G Park; George Triadafilopoulos; Brendan C Visser
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Laparoscopic approach in gastrointestinal emergencies.

Authors:  Rosa M Jimenez Rodriguez; Juan José Segura-Sampedro; Mercedes Flores-Cortés; Francisco López-Bernal; Cristobalina Martín; Verónica Pino Diaz; Felipe Pareja Ciuro; Javier Padillo Ruiz
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Transgastric Pancreatic Necrosectomy: How I Do It.

Authors:  Nicholas J Zyromski; Attila Nakeeb; Michael G House; Andrea L Jester
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  Surgical and interventional management of complications caused by acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Feza Y Karakayali
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Indian College of Radiology and Imaging Consensus Guidelines on Interventions in Pancreatitis.

Authors:  Pankaj Gupta; Kumble S Madhusudhan; Aswin Padmanabhan; Pushpinder Singh Khera
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2022-07-31

7.  Outcomes in Endoscopic and Operative Transgastric Pancreatic Debridement.

Authors:  Thomas K Maatman; Sean P McGuire; Katelyn F Flick; Mackenzie K Madison; Mohammad A Al-Haddad; Benjamin L Bick; Eugene P Ceppa; John M DeWitt; Jeffrey J Easler; Evan L Fogel; Mark A Gromski; Michael G House; Glen A Lehman; Attila Nakeeb; C Max Schmidt; Stuart Sherman; James L Watkins; Nicholas J Zyromski
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 13.787

Review 8.  Minimally Invasive Necrosectomy Techniques in Severe Acute Pancreatitis: Role of Percutaneous Necrosectomy and Video-Assisted Retroperitoneal Debridement.

Authors:  Jennifer A Logue; C Ross Carter
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 2.260

9.  Mortality and morbidity in necrotizing pancreatitis managed on principles of step-up approach: 7 years experience from a single surgical unit.

Authors:  Deshpande Aparna; Sunil Kumar; Shukla Kamalkumar
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-10-27
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.