Literature DB >> 23551808

Validity and reliability of a smartphone application for the assessment of penile deformity in Peyronie's disease.

Ryan S Hsi1, James M Hotaling, Andrea L Hartzler, Sarah K Holt, Thomas J Walsh.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Available methods to evaluate men with Peyronie's disease (PD) are limited by the inability to accurately and reproducibly measure penile deformity. AIM.: The study aims to evaluate the performance of a smartphone application for the measurement of penile curvature and narrowing.
METHODS: A smartphone application, the University of Washington Peyronie's Examination Network (UWPEN), was developed for this purpose. To assess penile curvature, 15 single cylinders of malleable penile prostheses were molded to varying curvature angles. Three blinded observers nonsequentially measured the angle of curvature for each prosthetic cylinder using a protractor, goniometer, and UWPEN. To assess girth narrowing, six clay models of the penile shaft were constructed to represent conditions of normal, partial hourglass, circumferential hourglass, and pencil narrowing. Girth was measured using a ruler and UWPEN by the same blinded observers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Statistical analyses compared intertest, interobserver, and intraobserver reliability using the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). An ICC above 0.75 indicates excellent reproducibility among measurements.
RESULTS: Intertest reliability for angle measurements yielded an ICC for the three methods of 1.000. Separately, the ICC for UWPEN vs. the goniometer and protractor was 0.999 and 0.999, respectively. The interobserver ICC for UWPEN, goniometer, and protractor was 0.998, 0.999, and 1.000, respectively. Intertest reliability for girth narrowing measurements yielded an ICC of 0.991. The interobserver ICC for girth narrowing for UWPEN and the ruler was 0.978 and 0.986, respectively. Intraobserver ICC for angle measurements and girth narrowing showed high reliability for all observers and methods.
CONCLUSIONS: The performance of UWPEN is comparable with and highly correlated with angle measurements obtained from the goniometer and protractor as well as with girth narrowing measurements obtained from a ruler. Measurements are reproducible among different observers. UWPEN may provide a noninvasive, accurate, reliable, and widely accessible method to characterize and track PD over time.
© 2013 International Society for Sexual Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cellular Phone; Penile Deformity; Penile Induration; Photography; Physiological; Sexual Dysfunction

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23551808     DOI: 10.1111/jsm.12136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Med        ISSN: 1743-6095            Impact factor:   3.802


  10 in total

1.  Smartphone versus knee ligament arthrometer when size does not matter.

Authors:  Andrea Ferretti; Ferretti Andrea; Luigi Valeo; Valeo Luigi; Daniele Mazza; Mazza Daniele; Luca Muliere; Muliere Luca; Paolo Iorio; Iorio Paolo; Giovanni Giovannetti; Giovannetti Giovanni; Fabio Conteduca; Conteduca Fabio; Raffaele Iorio; Iorio Raffaele
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Smartphone technology and its applications in urology: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Shlomi Tapiero; Renai Yoon; Francis Jefferson; John Sung; Luke Limfueco; Courtney Cottone; Sherry Lu; Roshan M Patel; Jaime Landman; Ralph V Clayman
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  A model for digital innovations in sexual medicine.

Authors:  Mikkel Fode; Giorgio I Russo; Maarten Albersen
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 2.896

4.  A Rare Consequence of Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease - Peyronie's Disease.

Authors:  Natasha A Jain; Krishnan Venkatesan; Prathima Anandi; Sawa Ito; Dhruv Kumar; Kit Lu; Minoo Battiwalla; A John Barrett
Journal:  Arch Cancer Res       Date:  2015

Review 5.  Comparing and Contrasting Peyronie's Disease Guidelines: Points of Consensus and Deviation.

Authors:  Madeleine G Manka; Lindsay A White; Faysal A Yafi; John P Mulhall; Laurence A Levine; Matthew J Ziegelmann
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.802

6.  mHealth in Urology: A Review of Experts' Involvement in App Development.

Authors:  Nuno Pereira-Azevedo; Eduardo Carrasquinho; Eduardo Cardoso de Oliveira; Vitor Cavadas; Luís Osório; Avelino Fraga; Miguel Castelo-Branco; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Objective measurements of the penile angulation are significantly different than self-estimated magnitude among patients with penile curvature.

Authors:  Giovanni Liguori; Andrea Salonia; Giulio Garaffa; Giovanni Chiriacò; Nicola Pavan; Giorgio Cavallini; Carlo Trombetta
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

8.  Automated quantification of penile curvature using artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Tariq O Abbas; Mohamed AbdelMoniem; Muhammad E H Chowdhury
Journal:  Front Artif Intell       Date:  2022-08-30

9.  Validation and reliability of a smartphone application for the International Prostate Symptom Score questionnaire: a randomized repeated measures crossover study.

Authors:  Jae Heon Kim; Soon-Sun Kwon; Sung Ryul Shim; Hwa Yeon Sun; Young Myoung Ko; Dong-Il Chun; Won Jae Yang; Yun Seob Song
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Mapping of Crowdsourcing in Health: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Perrine Créquit; Ghizlène Mansouri; Mehdi Benchoufi; Alexandre Vivot; Philippe Ravaud
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 5.428

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.